DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Citizen-led Facebook Public Diplomacy: A Case Study of Libyans' Views of the US

  • Lisa Gibson (Conflict and Resolution Studies, Washington and Jefferson College)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.30
  • 심사 : 2023.10.12
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31

초록

Citizen engagement in public diplomacy efforts has been considered important since its earliest conceptualizations in the 1960s. Since 9/11, the US government has put a strong focus on citizen engagement in promoting positive images of the US, its values and culture, suggesting that these activities would improve foreign publics views of US foreign policy. However, much of the public diplomacy scholarship has primarily focused on the state centric messaging form of public diplomacy to the neglect of interactions and relationships. In recent years, scholars have begun calling for an increased focus on nonstate actors, networks, and relational approaches to public diplomacy. Yet, there is still a strong need for empirical studies into how participants in these kinds of activities perceive them and how they affect their views. This article provides a case study of citizen-led public diplomacy between Libyan and American citizens through Facebook friendship groups and uses Facebook focus group interviews with Libyans to understand how these groups shape their views. The study finds that these kinds of activities are useful in promoting understanding and improved images of Americans and its culture. However, these activities do not improve Libyans views of US foreign policy.

키워드

과제정보

All participants in this study gave informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee at the University of Nottingham.

참고문헌

  1. Ayhan, K.J., & Sevin, E. (2022). Moving public diplomacy research forward: methodological approaches. Place Brand Public Diplomacy. 18, pp. 201-203.
  2. Brown, J. (2010). Public Diplomacy: "Out" for the U.S., "In" Overseas?" Huffington Post. [Online]. 11 November. [Accessed 12 December 2019]. Available from: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/public-diplomacy-out-for_b_788931
  3. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 13, pp. 210-230.
  4. Bush, G. (2001). Bush Press Conference. 11 October. Washington Post. [Online]. [Accessed 5 July 2019]. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/attacked/transcripts/bush_text101101.html??noredirect=on
  5. Clinton, H. (2010). Leading through Civilian Power. Foreign Affairs 89. [Online]. [Accessed 16 October 2017]. Available from: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/66799/hillary-rodham-clinton/leading-through-civilian-power
  6. Cowan, G. & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 616(1), pp. 10-30.
  7. Cull, N. (2013). The Long Road to Public Diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in the Use of Public Diplomacy. International Studies Review. 15, pp. 123-139.
  8. D'Hooghe, I. (2015). China's Public Diplomacy. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
  9. Diplomatic and Consular Program (D&CP). (no date). Public Diplomacy, Resource Summary, p.57. [Online]. [Accessed 16 October 2016]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/181074.pdf
  10. Fitzpatrick, K. (2013). Public Diplomacy and Ethics: From Soft Power to Social Conscience. In: R. Zaharna et al. (eds.) Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, pp. 29-43.
  11. Glassman, J. (2008). Public Diplomacy 2.0: A New Approach to Global Engagement. U.S. Department of State. [Online]. 1 December. [Accessed 13 January 2020]. Available from: https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/us/2008/112605.htm
  12. Gregory, B. (2012). American Public Diplomacy. In: P. Sharp & G. Wiseman (eds.) American Diplomacy. Martinus Nijhoff.
  13. Hall, P. & Bach-Lombardo, J. (2017). The New Network Effect: A Model for Influence. In: McClory, J. ed. The Soft Power 30 Report. USC Center for Public Diplomacy, pp. 91-93.
  14. Hayden, C. (2013). Facilitating the Conversation: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election and Public Diplomacy Through Social Media. American Behavioral Scientist. 57(11), pp. 1623-1644.
  15. Helland, E. (2017). Virtual exchange and the evolution of citizen diplomacy. In: J. McClory (ed.) The Soft Power 30 Report. USC Center for Public Diplomacy, pp. 96-100.
  16. Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the New Public Diplomacy. In: J. Melissen (ed.) The New Public Diplomacy. Palgrave, pp. 23-43.
  17. Hughes, K. (2005). The Mission of Public Diplomacy. US Department of State. [Online]. 22 July. [Accessed 9 November 2019]. Available from: https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/us/2005/49967.htm
  18. Iosifidis, P. & Wheeler, M. (2016). Public Diplomacy 2.0 and the Social Media. In: Public Spheres and Mediated Social Networks in the Western Context and Beyond. Palgrave, MacMillan.
  19. Kitzinger, J. & Barbour, R. (1999). The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups. In: J. Barbour & J. Kitzinger, (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research. London: Sage.
  20. Libya Observer. (2017). East Libya government bans Americans from entering Libya. [Online]. 27 September. [Accessed 1 October 2018]. Available from: https://www.libyaobserver.ly/news/east-libya-government-bans-americans-%E2%80%9Centering-libya%E2%80%9D
  21. Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy. London: Palgrave.
  22. Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power. New York: Public Affairs.
  23. Nye, J. (2019). American soft power after Trump. In: J. McClory. (ed.) The Soft Power 30 Report. USC Center on Public Diplomacy.
  24. Pamment, J., Fjallhed, A., & Smedberg, M. (2023). The 'Logics' of Public Diplomacy: In Search of What Unites a Multidisciplinary Research Field. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. (published online ahead of print 2023). [Accessed 19 December 2023]. Available from: B https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10161
  25. Peterson, P. (2002). Public Diplomacy and the War on Terrorism. Foreign Affairs. [Online]. September/October. [Accessed 5 July 2019]. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2002-09-01/public-diplomacy-and-war-terrorism
  26. Pigman, G. (2010). Contemporary Diplomacy. Polity Press.
  27. Seo, H. (2013). The Virtual Last Three Feet. In: R. Zaharna. (ed.) Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
  28. Shay, A. (2013). Israel's New Peer-to-Peer Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 7(4), pp. 473-482.
  29. Stanley, L. (2016). Using Focus Groups in political science and international relations. Politics. 36(3), pp. 236-249.
  30. Tam, L. (2019). Interpersonal approaches to relationship building: diplomat as a human agent of public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 15(2), pp. 134-142.
  31. The White House. (2017). Fact Sheet: Proclamation on Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry into the United States by Terrorist or Other Public-Safety Threats. 24 September.
  32. USC Center for Public Diplomacy. (no date). What is Public Diplomacy? [Online]. [Accessed 31 December 2019]. Available from: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/page/what-is-pd
  33. United States Department of State. (no date). You Are A Citizen Diplomat. [Online]. [Accessed August 19, 2019]. Available from: https://diplomacy.state.gov/you-are-a-diplomat
  34. Van Ham, P. (2013). Social Power in Public Diplomacy. In: R. Zaharna et al. (eds.) Relational, Collaborative and Networked Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
  35. Van Noort, C. (2011). Social Media Strategy: Bringing Public Diplomacy 2.0 to the next level. Washington, D.C.: Netherlands Embassy.
  36. Zaharna, R. (2009). Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks. In: N. Snow & P. Taylor. (eds.) Public diplomacy. Routledge, pp .86-100.
  37. Zaharna, R. (2012). The Cultural Awakening in Public Diplomacy. Figueroa Press.
  38. Zaharna, R., Fisher, A. & Arsenault, A. (2013). Introduction. In: R. Zaharna. et al. (eds.) Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
  39. Zatepilina-Monacell, O. (2012). High stakes: U.S. nonprofit organizations and the U.S. standing abroad. Public Relations Review. [Online] 38(3), pp. 471-476. [Accessed: 31 October 2016]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811112000318