Journal of Public Diplomacy

한국공공외교학회 (The Korean Association for Public Diplomacy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nation branding in times of refugee crisis: Digital media practices of Belgian and Swedish governmental institutions

  • Weronika Rucka (Institute for Media Studies, KU Leuven) ;
  • Rozane De Cock (Institute for Media Studies, KU Leuven) ;
  • Tim Smits (Institute for Media Studies, KU Leuven)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.11
  • 심사 : 2023.10.30
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although immigration and related policies are among crucial factors building a country's reputation, in-depth studies comparing nation branding strategies of countries facing high influx of refugees are lacking. This holds especially true when it concerns nations with different geopolitical, cultural, state structural and linguistic characteristics. There is also a growing need to widen our knowledge on digital nation branding and how it can be applied to respond to crisis situations as the refugee dilemma. This empirical study aims to fill these gaps focusing on Belgium and Sweden as an insightful comparative case study. The study's objectives are: (i) comparing similarities and differences between the countries' approach to managing their (digital) nation brand; ii) studying the countries' digital nation branding and communication management regarding migration and asylum topics since the mid-2010s refugee crisis. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with sixteen representatives of Belgian and Swedish governmental institutions. Our findings reveal differences between branding strategies of Belgium and Sweden resulting from their different contextual characteristics. What characterizes both nations' strategies is the increased importance of using digital media and the need of adapting to their market logics. Although the mid-2010s refugee crisis has not changed the countries' general digital nation branding strategy, but rather brought sensitive topics into sharp focus, it did lead to communication challenges that the institutions had to face. The Swedish institutions seem to be more active and structured in countering them. We conclude that well-established nation branding strategies are useful tools for governments to base on before, during and after crisis events. The example of Sweden shows that crises can act as an opportunity to reinforce a nation brand.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaker, D. (2004). Brand Portfolio Strategy: Creating Relevance, Differentiation, Energy, Leverage, and Clarity. New York: Free Press.
  2. ab Iago, D. (2006, July 11). Branding Belgium. Retrieved from Nation-Branding.info: https://nation-branding.info/2006/07/11/branding-belgium/
  3. Anholt, S. (1998). Nation-brands of the twenty-first century. Journal of Brand Management, 5(6), 395-406.
  4. Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  5. Anholt, S. (2010). Places: Identity, Image and Reputation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Aronczyk, M. (2008). "Living the Brand": Nationality, Globality and the Identity Strategies of Nation Branding Consultants. International Journal of Communication, 2, 41-65.
  7. Avraham, E. (2009). Marketing and managing nation branding during prolonged crisis: The case of Israel. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(3), 202-212.
  8. Avraham, E., & Ketter, E. (2008). Media strategies for marketing places in crises: Improving the image of cities, countries, and tourist destinations. Oxford: Elsevier.
  9. Bengtsson, S. (2011, July). Virtual nation branding: the Swedish embassy in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(2), 1-26.
  10. Bolin, G., & Miazhevich, G. (2018). The soft power of commercialised nationalist symbols: Using media analysis to understand nation branding campaigns. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 527-542.
  11. Bolin, G., & Stahlberg, P. (2010). Between Community and Commodity. Nationalism and Nation Branding. Communicating the Nation: National Topographies of Global Media Landscapes, 79-101.
  12. Bolin, G., & Stahlberg, P. (2015). Mediating the Nation-State: Agency and the Media in Nation-Branding Campaigns. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3065-3083.
  13. Britannica. (n.d.). Neoliberalism. Retrieved May 25, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/neoliberalism
  14. Cassinger, C., Merkelsen, H., Eksell, J., & Kjaergaard Rasmussen, R. (2016). Translating public diplomacy and nation branding in Scandinavia: An institutional approach to the cartoon crises. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 12, 172-186.
  15. Chung, C. J., Rhee, Y., & Cha, H. (2020). Big Data Analyses of Korea's Nation Branding on Google and Facebook. Korea Observer, 51(1), 151-174.
  16. Cinca, L., & Hirtie, D. D. (2010). The Influence of Cultural Division on Country Image The Belgium Case: Flanders vs. Wallonia. In I. C. Veljanova, Perception, Meaning and Identity (pp. 71-80). Leiden: Brill.
  17. Criekemans, D. (2010). Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of the Belgian Regions: Flanders and Wallonia. The Hague: Netherlands institute of international relations Clingendael.
  18. Cull, N. J. (2011). WikiLeaks, public diplomacy 2.0 and the state of digital public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7(1), 1-8.
  19. De Cock, R., Mertens, S., Sundin, E., Lams, L., Mistiaen, V., Joris, W., & d'Haenens, L. (2018). Refugees in the news: Comparing Belgian and Swedish newspaper coverage of the European refugee situation during summer 2015. Communications, 43(3), 301-323.
  20. d'Haenens, L., & Joris, W. (2019). Images of Immigrants and Refugees in Western Europe: Media Representations, Public Opinion, and Refugees' Experiences. In L. d'Haenens, W. Joris, & F. Heinderyckx, Images of Immigrants and Refugees in Western Europe: Media Representations, Public Opinion, and Refugees' Experiences (pp. 7-18). Leuven University Press.
  21. Dinnie, K. (2009). Nation branding. Concepts, issues, practice. Oxford: Elsevier.
  22. European Commission. (2018). Eurobarometer Interactive. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from Eurobarometer Interactive: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/index
  23. Eurostat. (2015). Eurostat newsrelease. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from First population estimates EU population up to 508.2 million at 1 January 2015. Over 1 million more people living in the EU than in 2014: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/6903510/3-10072015-AP-EN.pdf/d2bfb01f-6ac5-4775-8a7e-7b104c1146d0
  24. Falkheimer, J., & Raknes, K. (2022). Nordic neighbors in pandemic crisis: the communication battle between Sweden and Norway. Place Branding and Publid Diplomacy, 18, 26-29.
  25. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2017). Refugee policy as 'negative nation branding': the case of Denmark and the Nordics. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 99-125.
  26. Ipsos. (2022, November 2). Nation Brands Index 2022: Germany finishes first again with Japan and Canada rounding out the top three nations. Retrieved June 7, 2023, from Ipsos.com: https://www.ipsos.com/en/nation-brands-index-2022
  27. Jansen, S. C. (2008). Designer nations: Neo-liberal nation branding - Brand Estonia. Social Identities, 14(1).
  28. Kaneva, N. (2011). Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117-141.
  29. Kaneva, N. (2017). The branded national imagination and its limits: Insights from the postsocialist experience. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 39(1), 116-138.
  30. Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1(1), 58-73.
  31. Kjaergaard Rasmussen, R., & Merkelsen, H. (2014). The risks of nation branding as crisis response: A case study of how the Danish government turned the Cartoon Crisis into a struggle with Globalization. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 10(3), 230-248.
  32. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249-261.
  33. Marland, A., Lewis, J. P., & Flanagan, T. (2017). Governance in the Age of Digital Media and Branding. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 30(1), 125-141.
  34. MIPEX. (2020). Retrieved April 17, 2020, from Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020: http://www.mipex.eu/
  35. Nadeau, J., & Olafsen, A. H. (2015). Country image evaluations and migration intentions. Place branding and public diplomacy, 11(4), 293-308.
  36. Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
  37. Olins, W. (2002). Branding the nation - the historical context. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 241-248.
  38. Olsson, E.-K. (2013). Public diplomacy as a crisis communication tool. The Journal of International Communication, 19(2), 219-234.
  39. Pamment, J., Olofsson, A., & Hjorth-Jenssen, R. (2017). The response of Swedish and Norwegian public diplomacy and nation branding actors to the refugee crisis. Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 326-341.
  40. Parsons, W. (1996). Crisis management. Career Development International, 1(5), 26-28.
  41. Popa, R.-E. (2016). Branding the Nation in the Digital Era: Why don't you come over? Cultures of Communication - Cultures de la communication, (1), 95-113.
  42. Puschmann, P., Sundin, E., De Coninck, D., & d'Haenens, L. (2019). Migration and integration policy in Europe: Comparing Belgium and Sweden. In L. d'Haenens, W. Joris, & F. Heinderyckx, Images of Immigrants and Refugees in Western Europe: Media Representations, Public Opinion and Refugees' Experiences (pp. 21-36). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  43. Sharing Sweden. (2017a, June 8). sharingsweden.se. Retrieved August 19, 2019, from Portraits of migration - Sweden beyond the headlines: https://sharingsweden.se/toolkits/portraits-of-migration/
  44. Sharing Sweden. (n.d.). Strategy for the Promotion of Sweden Abroad. Retrieved from Sharingsweden.se: https://sharingsweden.se/app/uploads/2015/06/Sverigefoldern-engelskai-A5-format.pdf
  45. Silvanto, S., Ryan, J., & McNulty, Y. (2015). An empirical study of nation branding for attracting internationally mobile skilled professionals. Career development international, 20(3), 238-258.
  46. Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. The Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 1-42.
  47. Taecharungroj, V., & Avraham, E. (2022). From tsunami through terror attacks to Covid-19: crisis communication strategies and recovery campaigns to combat Thailand's tourism crises. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 41-64.
  48. Varga, S. (2013). The politics of Nation Branding: Collective identity and public sphere in the neoliberal state. Philosophy & social criticism, 39(8), 825-845.
  49. Vaxevanidou, M. (2017). Nation Rebranding in a Period of Crisis and the Role of Public Diplomacy: The Case Study of Greece. Journal of Media Critiques, 3(11), 57-71.
  50. Volcic, Z., & Andrejevic, M. (2011). Nation Branding in the Era of Commercial Nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 598-618.
  51. Yang, A., & Saffer, A. (2018). NGOs' Advocacy in the 2015 Refugee Crisis: A Study of Agenda Building in the Digital Age. The American behavioral scientist, 62(4), 421-439.
  52. Yousaf, S., Tauni, M. Z., & Xiucheng, F. (2021). Migration intentions: a sign of a weak nation brand? A multi-group analysis between China and Pakistan. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(2), 262-280.