DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing the Structure of Port Stakeholders in Port Risk Management

  • Tsenskhuu Nyamjav (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Min-Ho Ha (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2023.09.27
  • Accepted : 2023.10.12
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the strength of stakeholder engagement in risk mitigation within seaport activities. Specifically, we focused on operational risk caused by strong winds, a significant risk factor in port operations. Our results indicated that stakeholders play a crucial role, contributing up to 81% in risk monitoring effects to alleviate risk caused by strong winds. The study's findings also showed the significance of the influence of each stakeholder involved in operational risk mitigation due to strong winds. Additionally, we introduced a model that can be applied to various risk conditions and port situations. This model was determined by Bayesian network analysis with Genie software.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the 4th Educational Training Program for the Shipping, Port and Logistics from the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.

References

  1. Barbrook-Johnson, P. and Penn, A. S.(2022), Systems Mapping: How to build and use causal models of systems. Springer Nature, p. 186. 
  2. Berle, O., Asbjornslett, B. E. and Rice, J. B.(2011), Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(6), pp. 696-705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.011
  3. Budiyanto, M. A. and Fernanda, H.(2020), Risk assessment of work accident in container terminals using the fault tree analysis method. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(6), p. 466. 
  4. Chen, J., Zhang, R., Dong, X., Lin, L., Zhu, Y., He, J., Christiani, D. C., Wei, Y. and Chen, F.(2019), shiny BN: an online application for interactive Bayesian network inference and visualization. BMC bioinformatics, 20, pp. 1-5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2565-8
  5. Denktas-Sakar, G. and Karatas-Cetin, C.(2012), Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), pp. 301-319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.01.002
  6. Dhahri, M., Elmsalmi, M., Aljuaid, A. M. and Hachicha, W.(2022), Seaport terminals risks prioritization using a structural modeling-based approach: A real case study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), p. 217. 
  7. Gregory, R., Harstone, M., Rix, G. J. and Bostrom, A.(2012), Seismic risk mitigation decisions at ports: Multiple challenges, multiple perspectives. Natural hazards review, 13(1), pp. 88-95.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000043
  8. Ha, M. H., Yang, Z., Notteboom, T., Ng, A. K. and Heo, M. W.(2017), Revisiting port performance measurement: A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 103, pp. 1-16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.008
  9. Henesey, L., Notteboom, T. and Davidsson, P.(2003), Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: An approach to sustainable port and terminal management. Multi-Agent Systems for Container Terminal Management, 99. 
  10. ISO 31000, 2018. Available online. https://shahrdevelopment.ir/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ISO-31000.pdf 
  11. John, A., Paraskevadakis, D., Bury, A., Yang, Z., Riahi, R. and Wang, J.(2014), An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations. Safety science, 68, pp. 180-194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.001
  12. John, A., Yang, Z., Riahi, R. and Wang, J.(2016), Arisk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks. Ocean Engineering, 111, pp. 136-147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.048
  13. Lam, J. S. L. and Yap, W. Y.(2019), A stakeholder perspective of port city sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(2), p. 447. 
  14. Lee, H. J. and Ha, M. H.(2022), "Novel Framework for Evaluating Container Port Risks - The Case of Incheon Port", Korea Logistics Review, 32(4), pp. 79-91.  https://doi.org/10.17825/klr.2022.32.4.79
  15. Mabrouki, C., Bentaleb, F. and Mousrij, A., 2014. A decision support methodology for risk management within a port terminal. Safety Science, 63, pp. 124-132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.015
  16. Mokhtari, K., Ren, J., Roberts, C. and Wang, J., 2011. Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. Journal of hazardous materials, 192(2), pp. 465-475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.035
  17. Nagi, A., Schroeder, M. and Kersten, W., 2021. Risk management in seaports: a community analysis at the port of Hamburg. Sustainability, 13(14), p. 8035. 
  18. Nagi, A. and Kersten, W.(2022), A process model for cooperative risk management in seaports. Sustainability, 14(3), p. 1662. 
  19. Nyamjav, T. and Ha, M. H.(2023), Understanding Relationships Among Risk Factors in Container Port Operation Using Bayesian Network. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Reserch, 47(2), pp. 93-99. 
  20. Pileggi, S. F., Indorf, M., Nagi, A. and Kersten, W.(2020), CoRiMaS-An ontological approach to cooperative risk management in seaports. Sustainability, 12(11), p. 4767. 
  21. Rahman, N. A.(2013), An assessment of global factors towards the financial performance of a containership using a Bayesian network method. Eur. J. Bus. Manag, 5(7), pp. 2222-2839. 
  22. Sim, M. S, Lee, J. M., Kim, D. Y. and Kim, Y. S.(2023), A Study on Improvement of Safety Management by Port Stevedoring Industry. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 47(1), pp. 37-48.  https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2023.47.1.37
  23. Starr, R., Newfrock, J. and Delurey, M.(2003), Enterprise resilience: managing risk in the networked economy. Strategy and business, 30, pp. 70-79. 
  24. Wagner, N.(2017), Identification of the most important sustainability topics in seaports. Logistics and Transport, 34(2), pp. 79-88. 
  25. Wan, C., Yan, X., Zhang, D. and Yang, Z.(2019), Analysis of risk factors influencing the safety of maritime container supply chains. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 11(6), pp. 476-507.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2019.103872
  26. Yang, R. J. and Zou, P. X.(2014), Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: A social network model. Building and environment, 73, pp. 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014