DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Limitations and Hopes of the Laboratory Method as the Epistemology of School Science in the 19th Century

19세기 학교 과학의 인식론으로서 실험실 방법의 한계와 희망

  • Received : 2023.08.07
  • Accepted : 2023.09.27
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

Through a review of the literature relevant to the history of science education, this study explored the limitations and hopes of the laboratory method as the epistemology of school science in the 19th century. The laboratory method was introduced into the school curriculum based on the inductive method of science as an ideal of the Scientific Revolution. The method emphasized direct contact with natural phenomena and aimed at mental discipline and moral uplift of students learning science in school. However, the laboratory method had the same epistemological limitations as the traditional philosophy of science, which were also found to be problematic in the context of school science education. Nevertheless, the laboratory method has significant implications for contemporary school science education in the sense that it emphasized direct encounters with natural phenomena as the primary means of understanding through scientific inquiry and that it sought the moral uplift of students through engagement in scientific practices for understanding phenomena. In particular, it is necessary to reflect on the hopes associated with the laboratory method as we prepare to implement the new science curriculum in schools in Korea.

본 연구에서는 과학교육사에 관한 문헌들을 고찰하여 19세기 학교 과학의 인식론으로서 실험실 방법이 지니는 한계와 희망에 대해 살펴보았다. 실험실 방법은 과학 혁명의 이상이었던 귀납적인 과학 방법론을 토대로 하여 학교 교육과정에 도입되었으며, 자연 현상에 대한 직접적인 접촉을 강조하고, 학교에서 과학의 공부하는 학생들의 정신 도야는 물론 도덕적 고양을 함께 도모하였다. 하지만 실험실 방법은 과학에 대한 전통적인 철학적 입장과 같은 인식론적인 한계를 지니고 있었으며, 학교 과학 교육의 맥락에서도 이와 관련된 제한점들이 문제로 지적되었다. 그럼에도 불구하고 실험실 방법은 과학적 탐구를 통한 이해의 가장 기본적인 방법으로서 자연 현상과의 직접적인 대면을 중요시하고, 현상을 이해하기 위한 과학적 실행을 통해 도덕적 고양에 이르는 것까지 추구하였다는 점에서 오늘날의 과학 교육에 유의미한 시사점을 제공하고 있다. 특히 새로운 과학 교육과정의 적용을 준비하고 있는 현 시기에 실험실 방법이 함의한 희망에 대해 다시금 궁구할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Achieve (2016). Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units. Washington, DC: Achieve.
  2. American Association of the Advancement of Science (1881). Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Twenty-Ninth Meeting, held at Boston, Mass., August 1880. Salem, MA: The Salem Press.
  3. American Association of the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  4. Barnes, C. R. (1898). Sciences in the high school. School Review, 6(9), 643-658. https://doi.org/10.1086/433963
  5. Beavington, L. (2021). Hard-rooted to nature: Rediscovering the forgotten forest in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10078-0
  6. Butler, L. P. (2020). The empirical child? A framework for investigating the development of scientific habits of mind. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12354
  7. Carhart, H. S., & Chute, H. N. (1892). The elements of physics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  8. Chalmers, A. (2013). What is this thing called science? Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
  9. Clarke, F. W. (1881). A report on the teaching of chemistry and physics in the united states. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  10. Cho, Y., & Clary, R. M. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for virtual learning in college geology. In Mintzes, J. & Walter, E. (Eds.), Active learning in college science: The case for evidence based practice (pp. 713-728). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
  11. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  12. DeBoer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspectives on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 17-35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  13. Dewing, A. S. (1908). Science teaching in schools: III. Science teaching and the laboratory method. School Science and Mathematics, 8(9), 740-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1908.tb01323.x
  14. Entress, C. (in press). The disappearance of natural history, fieldwork, and live organism study from american biology teacher education. Science & Education.
  15. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  16. Gower, B. (1997). Scientific method: An historical and philosophical introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
  17. Griffin, L. F. (1892). The laboratory in the school. School and College, 1(8), 469-477.
  18. Gunshenan, C., Inouye, M., Houseal, A., & Jacobs, T. (2021). Phenomenon-based professional development: Shifting perspectives between teacher and learner to build understanding of complex science instruction. Science & Children, 58(4), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368148.2021.12291659
  19. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Hall, E. H. (1892). Teaching elementary physics. Educational Review, 4, 157-163.
  21. Hall, E. H. (1905). Experimental work in high-school physics. Educational Review, 30, 94-96.
  22. Harvard University (1889). Descriptive list of elementary physical experiments: Intended for use in preparing students for Harvard College. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University.
  23. Hong, S. (2020). The evolution of laboratories. Paju: Gimm-Young Publishers.
  24. Howe, J. L. (1892). The teaching of science. Science, 19(481), 233-235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-19.481.233
  25. Huxely, T. H. (1893). Science & Education. London, UK: Macmillan and Co.
  26. Inouye, M., Houseal, A., & Gunshenan, C. (2020). Beyond the hook: What is a phenomenon and how is it used? The Science Teacher, 87(9), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2020.12293545
  27. Mackenzie, A. H. (2021). Technology and scientific habits of mind. The Science Teacher, 88(4), 6-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2021.12293590
  28. Maeng, S. (2018). Practical epistemology analysis on epistemic process in science learning. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2018.37.2.173
  29. Martin, M. (1986). Science education and moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 15(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724860150201
  30. McNeill, K. C., Affolter, R., & Clinchot, M. (2021). Shifting from learning about to figuring out: PD resources to support classroom change. Science Scope, 45(2), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08872376.2021.12291445
  31. Moon, M.-J. (2018). Reexamination of the meaning of character education based on Polanyi's theory of knowledge. The Journal of Education, 38(3), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.25020/je.2018.38.3.289
  32. Myers, G. W. (1903). The laboratory method in the secondary school. The School Review, 11(9), 727-741. https://doi.org/10.1086/434528
  33. National Education Association (1893). Report of the committee on secondary school studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  34. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  35. Newell, L. C. (1902). Professor Remsen on the teaching of science. School Science and Mathematics, 2(3), 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1902.tb00417.x
  36. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  37. Norton, W. H. (1902). The teaching of science. School Science and Mathematics, 2(4), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1902.tb00434.x
  38. Oh, P. S. (2020). A critical review of the skill-based approach to scientific inquiry in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.141
  39. Oh, P. S. (2022). Possibility of science concept learning in scientific practice-based science education: A review focused on situated learning theories and conceptual agency. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(4), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2022.42.4.477
  40. Oh, P. S., & Ahn, Y. (2013). An analysis of classroom discourse as an epistemic practice: Based on elementary science classrooms. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2013.32.3.269
  41. Oh, P. S., & Ahn, Y. (2015). Exploration of discursive-epistemic mechanisms in high school earth science lessons. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 36(4). 390-403. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2015.36.4.390
  42. Ostman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2014). A pragmatic approach on epistemology, teaching, and learning. Science Education, 98(3), 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21105
  43. Pruitt, S. L. (2015). The Next Generation Science Standards: Where are we now and what have we learned? The Science Teacher, 82(5), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst15_082_05_17
  44. Rice, W. N. (1888). Science-teaching in the schools. American Naturalist, 22(261), 765-774. https://doi.org/10.1086/274776
  45. Rowland, H. A. (1886). The physical laboratory in modern education. Science, 7(177), 573-575. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-7.177S.573
  46. Rudolph, J. L. (2003). Portraying epistemology: School science in historical context. Science Education, 87(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1055
  47. Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Epistemology for the masses: The origins of "the scientific method" in american schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45(3), 341-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5959.2005.tb00039.x
  48. Rudolph, J. L. (2019). How we teach science: What's changed, and why it matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  49. Rudolph, J. L. (2020). The lost moral purpose of science education. Science Education, 104(5), 865-906. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21590
  50. Rudolph, J. L., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science education in american high schools. In H. R. Slotten (Ed.), Oxford encyclopedia of the history of american science, medicine, and technology (pp. 503-523). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  51. Russ, R. S. (2014). Epistemology of science vs. epistemology for science. Science Education, 98(3), 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21106
  52. Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser. B. J. (2017). Moving beyond "knowing about" science to making sense of the world. In C. V. Schwarz, C. Passmore & B. J. Reiser (Eds.), Helping students make sense of the world using next generation science and engineering practices (pp. 3-21). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  53. Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2018). Can science literacy help individual identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education, 104(5), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581
  54. Sharp, R. P. (1988). Earth science field work: Role and status. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 16, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.16.050188.000245
  55. Smith, A., & Hall, E. H. (1902). The teaching of chemistry and physics in the secondary school. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.
  56. Song, J. (2012). When science met people through education: The mechanics' institute movement in the 19th century Britain. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(3), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.3.541
  57. Speidel, M. G. (2018). The emergence of the laboratory method and the displacement of natural philosophy by physics in american high school textbooks (1860-1900). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
  58. Spencer, H. (1860). Education: Intellectual, moral, and physical. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
  59. The Ministry of Education (2022). Science Curriculum. Sejong: The Ministry of Education.
  60. Thompson, D., Praia, J., & Marques, L. (2000). The importance of history and epistemology in the designing of earth science curriculum materials for general science education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/713694956
  61. Wead, C. K. (1884). Aims and methods of the teaching of physics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  62. Williams, R. P. (1901). Teaching of chemistry in schools: 1987, 1910. Science, 14(342), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.14.342.100
  63. Youmans, E. L. (1867). On mental discipline in education. In E. L. Youmans (Ed.), The culture demanded by modern life (pp. 1-56). Arkon, OH: The Werner Company.