DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of food-related lifestyle, and SNS use and recommended information utilization on dining out

혼밥 및 외식소비 관련 식생활라이프스타일과 SNS 이용 및 추천정보활용의 영향

  • Jin A Jang (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University)
  • 장진아 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2023.04.11
  • Accepted : 2023.06.09
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine social networking service (SNS) use and recommended information utilization (SURU) according to the food-related lifestyles (FRLs) of consumers and analyze how the interaction between the FRL and SURU affects the practice of eating alone and visiting restaurants. Methods: Data on 4,624 adults in their 20s to 50s were collected from the 2021 Consumer Behavior Survey for Food. Statistical methods included factor analysis, K-means cluster analysis, the complex samples general linear model, the complex samples Rao-Scott χ2 test, and the general linear model. Results: The following three factors were extracted from the FRL data: Convenience pursuit, rational consumption pursuit, and gastronomy pursuit, and the subjects were classified into three groups, namely the rational consumption, convenient gastronomy, and smart gourmet groups. An examination of the difference in SURU according to the FRL showed that the smart gourmet group had the highest score. The result of analyzing the effects of the FRL and SURU on eating alone revealed that both the main effect and the interaction effect were significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). The higher the SURU, the higher the frequency of eating alone in the convenience pursuit, and gastronomy pursuit groups. The main and interaction effects of the FRL and SURU on the frequency of eating out were also significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). In all the FRL groups, the higher the SURU level, the higher the frequency of visiting restaurants. Specifically, the two groups with convenience and gastronomic tendencies showed a steeper increase. Conclusion: This study provides important basic data for research on consumer behavior related to food SNS, market segmentation of restaurant consumers, and development of marketing strategies using SNS in the future.

본 연구는 2021년 식품소비행태조사 자료를 활용하여 20-50대 소비자들의 식생활라이프스타일(FRL)에 따른 SNS 이용 및 추천정보 활용 (SURU) 정도를 살펴보고, 이러한 FRL과 SURU간의 상호작용이 혼밥 및 방문 외식소비에 있어 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 각각의 척도는 요인분석과 K-means 군집분석을 이용해 요인들을 추출하고 군집으로 분류하였으며, FRL에 따른 SURU 특성을 알아보기 위해 복합표본 교차분석과 일변량분석을 실시했으며, 혼밥 정도와 외식정도에 있어 FRL과 SURU의 영향을 알아보기위해 일변량분석을 이용하였다. 그 결과, FRL은 편의성추구, 합리적소비추구, 미식추구의 3가지 요인으로 추출되었으며, 이를 기반으로 합리적소비군, 편의적미식군, 스마트미식군으로 분류되었다. SURU는 한 가지 요인으로 추출되었으며, 점수에 따라 고·중·저 그룹으로 분류되었다. FRL에 따른 SURU 정도 및 SURU 그룹 비율의 차이를 살펴본 결과, 스마트미식군에 있어 점수가 가장 높았으며, SURU 그룹 비율에 있어 저 그룹에서는 합리적소비군, 중 그룹에서는 스마트미식군, 고 그룹에서는 편의적미식군과 스마트미식군이 유사한 수준으로 높게 나타났다. 혼밥에 있어서의 FRL과 SURU의 영향을 분석한 결과, 주효과와 상호작용 효과가 모두 유의하게 나타났다 (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). FRL 그룹 중 합리적소비군을 제외한 나머지 두 군집에서 SURU가 높아질수록 혼밥 정도가 높아졌는데 그 중 편의적미식군에 있어 증가 폭이 더 크게 나타났다. 외식정도에 대한 FRL과 SURU의 주효과와 상호작용 효과 역시 모두 유의하게 나타났다 (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). 모든 FRL 그룹에 있어 SURU 수준이 높아질수록 외식정도가 높게 나타났는데, 특히 합리적소비군에 비해 편의성과 미식성향이 나타나는 두 군집에 있어 더 가파르게 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 그 중에서도 스마트미식군에 있어 SURU 수준에 따라 방문 외식 정도가 더 급격히 증가하였다. 최근의 다변화, 다양화 되고있는 식생활에서 중요한 정보수집 도구이자 강력한 구전 수단인 SNS의 이용자에 대해 심층적으로 분석한 본 연구는 향후 식품 외식 SNS 관련 소비자 행동 연구 및 외식 소비자들의 시장세분화와 SNS를 이용한 마케팅 전략 수립에 있어 중요한 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YH. Social network service (SNS) usage behavior by generation [Internet]. Jincheon: KISDI STAT; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: https://mediasvr.egentouch.com/egentouch.media/apiFile.do?action=view&SCHOOL_ID=1007002&URL_KEY=a3559b65-b36d-4a2c-8abb-67841e61203e.
  2. Korea Internet & Security Agency. 2012 internet usage summary report [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism; 2013 [cited 2023 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=33027.
  3. Chen Z, Kim CJ. The effect of SNS market activity characteristics and influencer characteristics on trust and brand attitude towards influencers: focusing on the moderating effect of involvement. e-Bus Stud 2022; 23(1): 165-184. https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2022.2.23.1.165
  4. Lee SM. The effect of SNS characteristics of restaurant companies on commitment, trust and purchase intention. J Tour Leisure Res 2021; 33(10): 181-200. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2021.10.33.10.181
  5. Lee YJ. A study on the effect of SNS information characteristics on value, satisfaction and reuse intention of restaurant customers. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2022; 28(4): 119-132.
  6. Sung EJ, Yoon J. A study on the restaurant customers' utilization of SNS sources according to stages of purchase. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2020; 36(6): 564-577. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2020.36.6.564
  7. Park JS. The effect of SNS on customer satisfaction and the intention: Focused on the users of the foodservice industry. J Hosp Tourism Stud 2013; 15(1): 265-278.
  8. Lim SY. Effects of Instagram eating-out information characteristics on satisfaction and intention to use. J Hotel Resort 2019; 18(3): 241-260.
  9. Park SJ, Lee SB. A study on the effects of the characteristics of SNS providing restaurant information on relation commitment and relationship retention intention. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2015; 29(6): 213-231.
  10. Kim KY, Kim MK, Sim JE. A study on the effects of the characteristics of SNS providing foodservice information on perceived value and behavioral intention. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2016; 30(12): 179-193. https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2016.12.30.12.179
  11. Kim HL, Kim HY, Moon H, Ham S. Experiential marketing for food contents in social network service (SNS): relations among brand satisfaction, brand trust and intention to brand information sharing. J Foodserv Manag 2019; 22(6): 115-136.
  12. Oh HJ, Yoon JY, Jeong HS. Influence of SNS usage characteristics on consumers' dine-out motivation, restaurant satisfaction, and quality of life. Korean Food Nutr 2014; 27(6): 1182-1192. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.6.1182
  13. Kang JW, Namkung Y. The effects of individual motivation factors and network externalities on satisfaction in restaurant information sharing on SNS. J Tourism Sci 2014; 38(8): 203-225.
  14. Park CI, Namkung Y. The effects of food Instagram users' motivation on flow, satisfaction and revisit intention. Korean J Hosp Tourism 2020; 29(8): 143-162. https://doi.org/10.24992/KJHT.2020.12.29.08.143.
  15. Grunert KG. Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: food-related life style. Adv Consum Res 1995; 22(1): 475-480.
  16. Brunso K, Grunert KG. Development and testing of a cross-culturally valid instrument: food-related lifestyle. Adv Consum Res 1995; 22: 475-480.
  17. Paik EJ, Lee HJ, Hong WS. Home meal replacement consumption status and product development needs according to dietary lifestyle of Hong Kong consumers. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2017; 46(7): 876-885.
  18. Kim S, Huh K. A study on food consumption life style of main food buyer, food safety consciousness, environment consciousness and eco-friendly food consumption. J Consum Cult 2019; 22(1): 23-44. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2019.22.1.002
  19. Jeon HJ, Kim M. The effects of dietary life style on the nutritional attitudes and purchase intention by HMR consumers. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2021; 27(5): 73-83.
  20. Lee SH. A study on the market segmentation of food consumption behavior by food related lifestyle. J Converg Spat Des 2021; 16(1): 61-80. https://doi.org/10.26433/TFCK.2021.16.1.61
  21. Choi YS, Hong C. Effects of HMR attributes on purchase intention according to food life style. Int J Tourism Manag Sci 2017; 32(8): 353-367.
  22. Yang DH. A study on consumer eating out purchases in with the food lifestyle: focusing on the moderating effects of consumer culture. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2016; 22(5): 13-24.
  23. Lee SI, Lee KM, Jung HG. The health directionality and cooking convenience of HMR products and the effect of product quality on customer satisfaction and purchasing behavior. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2018; 32(11): 169-181. https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2018.11.32.11.169
  24. Lee YJ, Lee KW, Keum SY, Ryu SH. Purchasing behavior and selection attributes for meal-kit products according to food-related lifestyle types. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2021; 31(4): 268-279. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.8.31.4.268
  25. Lee SJ, Park JY. The effects of selective attributes of meal kit according to dietary lifestyle on purchase intention and satisfaction. J Hotel Resort 2022; 21(4): 279-298.
  26. Lee JW. The effects of food-related lifestyle on delivery food selection attributes and satisfaction. J Converg Tourism Contents 2022; 8(3): 5-20. https://doi.org/10.22556/jctc.2022.8.3.5
  27. Heo SJ, Bae HJ. Analysis of the consumption pattern of delivery food according to food-related lifestyle. J Nutr Health 2020; 53(5): 547-561. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.5.547
  28. Choi YM, Kim HK. A study on the difference between dietary lifestyle and HMR choice attributes. J Foodserv Manag 2022; 22(5): 199-220.
  29. KREI. 2021 Consumer behavior survey for foods fundamental analysis reports [Internet]. Naju: KREI; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 22]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/foodSurvey/selectBbsNttView.do?key=805&bbsNo=448&nttNo=158541&searchCtgry=&searchCnd=all&searchKrwd=&pageIndex=1&integrDeptCode=.
  30. KREI. 2021 consumer behavior survey for foods [Internet]. Naju: KREI; 2022. [cited 2023 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/foodSurvey/selectBbsNttList.do?bbsNo=451&key=1774.
  31. Lim JH, Kim KM, Song JE, Choi JW. Latent profile analysis of SNS user behavior in different age groups [Internet]. Jincheon: KISDI STAT; 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: https://mediasvr.egentouch.com/egentouch.media/apiFile.do?action=view&SCHOOL_ID=1007002&URL_KEY=ff4c28b1-5ff3-48bc-a981-c69e2f531cb3.
  32. Ministry of Science and ICT. 2021 internet usage survey [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Science and ICT; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.msit.go.kr/bbs/view.do?sCode=user&bbsSeqNo=79&nttSeqNo=3173463.
  33. Embrain. Research on solo dining and solo restaurants. Seoul: Embrain; 2017.
  34. Lee SY, Heo ML. A study on prevent depression in Koreans aged 20-29 years through analysis of 'eating alone'. Health Welf 2021; 23(1): 183-200. https://doi.org/10.23948/kshw.2021.03.23.1.183
  35. Lee D. Growth of food industry from change of consumer's living environment: HMR market growth factor. Food Sci Ind 2017; 50(3): 33-38.
  36. Kim M, Lee S. A study of measurement development of solo diners' motives. J Tour Sci 2018; 42(4): 149-168. https://doi.org/10.17086/JTS.2018.42.4.149.168
  37. An S, Lee H. Generational differences between nurses focus on work value and job engagement. J Digital Converg 2020; 18(9): 199-210.
  38. Lee J, Oh J. A study on the influence of modern people's hon-bob behavior. J Korea Entertain Ind Assoc 2019; 13(5): 15-24. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2019.7.13.5.15
  39. Jeong YS. There is a separate healthy meal for the body'... Eating alone, smartphones, and the sociology of stress [Internet]. Seoul: SBS News; 2017 [cited 2013 Mar 29]. Available from: https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1004319796&plink=ORI&cooper=NAVER&plink=COPYPASTE&cooper=SBSNEWSEND.
  40. Blachnio A, Przepiorka A, Boruch W, Balakier E. Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people. Pers Individ Dif 2016; 94: 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.051
  41. Lim S. Effect of solo dining selection attributes on satisfaction according to the dietary life style [dissertation]. Seoul: Sejong University; 2018.
  42. Lee HS, Namkung Y. Social networking services(SNS): motivation, SNS participation, and behavioral intention to visit restaurants. J Tourism Sci 2015; 39(8): 151-168.
  43. Kim SK, Lee YM, Song K, Lee Y. Association of healthy dietary and eating-out behavior with food involvement among young adults in Seoul and Gyeonggi area. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2021; 31(2): 123-132. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.4.31.2.123