DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi-Dimensional Selection Method of Port Logistics Location Based on Entropy Weight Method

  • Ruiwei Guo (School of Economics and Trade Management, Taizhou Vocational College of Science & Technology)
  • Received : 2022.04.22
  • Accepted : 2022.09.14
  • Published : 2023.08.31

Abstract

In order to effectively relieve the traffic pressure of the city, ensure the smooth flow of freight and promote the development of the logistics industry, the selection of appropriate port logistics location is the basis of giving full play to the port logistics function. In order to better realize the selection of port logistics, this paper adopts the entropy weight method to set up a multi-dimensional evaluation index, and constructs the evaluation model of port logistics location. Then through the actual case, from the environmental dimension and economic competition dimension to make choices and analysis. The results show that port d has the largest logistics competitiveness and the highest relative proximity among the three indicators of hinterland city economic activity, hinterland economic structure, and port operation capacity of different port logistics locations, which has absolute advantages. It is hoped that the research results can provide a reference for the multi-dimensional selection of port logistics site selections.

Keywords

References

  1. C. Teye, M. G. Bell, and M. C. Bliemer, "Entropy maximising facility location model for port city intermodal terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 100, pp. 1-16, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.01.006
  2. K. Komchornrit, "The selection of dry port location by a hybrid CFA-MACBETH-PROMETHEE method: a case study of Southern Thailand," The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 141-153, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.09.004
  3. Y. Tian, "Impact of Ningbo port logistics on regional economic development of Zhejiang Province," Asian Agricultural Research, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 16-18, 2019.
  4. H. Wei and M. Dong, "Import-export freight organization and optimization in the dry-port-based cross-border logistics network under the Belt and Road Initiative," Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 130, pp. 472-484, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.007
  5. H. Wei and Z. Sheng, "Dry ports-seaports sustainable logistics network optimization: considering the environment constraints and the concession cooperation relationships," Polish Maritime Research, vol. 24, no. s3, pp. 143-151, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/pomr-2017-0117
  6. E. Irannezhad, C. G. Prato, and M. Hickman, "An intelligent decision support system prototype for hinterland port logistics," Decision Support Systems, vol. 130, article no. 113227, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113227
  7. G. Lyu, L. Chen, and B. Huo, "The impact of logistics platforms and location on logistics resource integration and operational performance," The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 549-568, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2018-0048
  8. T. Hamid, D. Al-Jumeily, and J. Mustafina, "Evaluation of the dynamic cybersecurity risk using the entropy weight method," in Technology for Smart Futures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60137-3_13
  9. F. Liu, S. Zhao, M. Weng, and Y. Liu, "Fire risk assessment for large-scale commercial buildings based on structure entropy weight method," Safety Science, vol. 94, pp. 26-40, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.009
  10. M. H. Ha, Z. Yang, and J. S. L. Lam, "Port performance in container transport logistics: a multi-stakeholder perspective," Transport Policy, vol. 73, pp. 25-40, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.021
  11. T. Li and W. Yang, "Solution to chance constrained programming problem in swap trailer transport organisation based on improved simulated annealing algorithm," Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47-54, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2020.1.00005
  12. H. G. Citil, "Important notes for a fuzzy boundary value problem," Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 305-314, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/AMNS.2019.2.00027
  13. B. Cao, J. Zhao, Y. Gu, Y. Ling, and X. Ma, "Applying graph-based differential grouping for multiobjective large-scale optimization," Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 53, article no. 100626, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100626
  14. B. Zeng, J. Feng, N. Liu, and Y. Liu, "Co-optimized public parking lot allocation and incentive design for efficient PEV integration considering decision-dependent uncertainties," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1863-1872, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2993815
  15. J. Lee, J. G. Andrews, and D. Hong, "Spectrum-sharing transmission capacity," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 3053-3063, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2011.070511.101941