Acknowledgement
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1I1A3049738).
References
- Gillmore JD, Gane E, Taubel J, Kao J, Fontana M, Maitland ML, et al. 2021. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. NEJM 385: 493-502. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107454
- Jiang F, Doudna JA. 2017. CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. 46: 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-010822
- Charpentier E, Marraffini LA. 2014. Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 immunity for genetic engineering. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 19: 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2014.07.001
- Naito Y, Hino K, Bono H, Ui-Tei K. 2015. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31: 1120-1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu743
- Razzaq A, Masood A. 2018. CRISPR/Cas9 System: a breakthrough in genome editing. Mol. Biol. 7: 2.
- Song X, Zhang X yu, Xiong Z qiang, Liu X xin, Xia Y jun, Wang S jie, et al. 2020. CRISPR-Cas-mediated gene editing in lactic acid bacteria. Mol. Biol. Rep. 47: 8133-8144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05820-w
- Behr M, Zhou J, Xu B, Zhang H. 2021. In vivo delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics: progress and challenges. Acta. Pharm. Sin. B 11: 2150-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.020
- Chen G, Abdeen AA, Wang Y, Shahi PK, Robertson S, Xie R, et al. 2019. A biodegradable nanocapsule delivers a Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for in vivo genome editing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14: 974-980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0539-2
- Park J, Choi S, Park S, Yoon J, Park AY, Choe S. 2019. Dna-free genome editing via ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery of CRISPR/Cas in Lettuce. Methods Mol. Biol. 1917: 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8991-1_25
- Farboud B, Jarvis E, Roth TL, Shin J, Corn JE, Marson A, et al. 2018. Enhanced genome editing with Cas9 ribonucleoprotein in diverse cells and organisms. J. Vis. Exp. 135: 57350.
- Hinz JM, Laughery MF, Wyrick JJ. 2015. Nucleosomes inhibit Cas9 endonuclease activity in vitro. Biochemistry 54: 7063-7066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01108
- Peng R, Lin G, Li J. 2016. Potential pitfalls of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. FEBS J. 283: 1218-1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13586
- Liu W, Yu H, Zhou X, Xing D. 2016. In vitro evaluation of CRISPR/Cas9 function by an electrochemiluminescent assay. Anal. Chem. 88: 8369-8374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02338
- Seamon KJ, Light YK, Saada EA, Schoeniger JS, Harmon B. 2018. Versatile high-throughput fluorescence assay for monitoring Cas9 activity. Anal. Chem. 90: 6913-6921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01155
- Gong S, Yu HH, Johnson KA, Taylor DW. 2018. DNA unwinding is the primary determinant of CRISPR-Cas9 activity. Cell Rep. 22: 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.041
- Raper AT, Stephenson AA, Suo Z. 2018. Functional insights revealed by the kinetic mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140: 2971-2984. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b13047
- Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. 2003. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 13761-13766. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235592100
- Postollec F, Falentin H, Pavan S, Combrisson J, Sohier D. 2011. Recent advances in quantitative PCR (qPCR) applications in food microbiology. Food Microbiol. 28: 848-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.02.008
- Kim SA, Bae JH, Seong H, Han NS. 2020. Development of Leuconostoc lactis-specific quantitative PCR and its application for identification and enumeration in fermented foods. Food Anal. Methods 13: 992-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-020-01720-8
- Svec D, Tichopad A, Novosadova V, Pfaffl MW, Kubista M. 2015. How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments. Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 3: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2015.01.005
- Wang P, Xiong A, Gao Z, Yu X, Li M, Hou Y, et al. 2016. Selection of suitable reference genes for RTqPCR normalization under abiotic stresses and hormone stimulation in persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb). PLoS One 11: e0160885.
- Jin Q, Li L, Kim YJ, Han NS. 2014. Construction of a dextran-free Leuconostoc citreum mutant by targeted disruption of the dextransucrase gene. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117: 1104-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12587
- Yu J, Baek K, Jin E, Bae S. 2017. DNA-free genome editing of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using CRISPR and subsequent mutant analysis. Bio. Protoc. 7: e2352.
- Bisswanger H. 2014. Enzyme assays. Perspect. Sci. 1: 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pisc.2014.02.005
- Wright A V., Sternberg SH, Taylor DW, Staahl BT, Bardales JA, Kornfeld JE, et al. 2015. Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 2984-2989. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501698112
- Concordet JP, Haeussler M. 2018. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 46: W242-W245. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky354
- Huggett JF, Novak T, Garson JA, Green C, Morris-Jones SD, Miller RF, et al. 2008. Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognized phenomenon. BMC Res. Notes 1: 70.
- Thornton B, Basu C. 2015. Rapid and simple method of qPCR primer design. Methods Mol. Biol. 1275: 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2365-6_13
- Lino CA, Harper JC, Carney JP, Timlin JA. 2018. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. Drug Deliv. 25: 1234-1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964
- Zhang S, Shen J, Li D, Cheng Y. 2020. Strategies in the delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Theranostics 11: 614-648. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.47007
- Dagdas YS, Chen JS, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA, Yildiz A. 2017. A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Sci. Adv. 3: eaao0027.
- Jensen KT, Floe L, Petersen TS, Huang J, Xu F, Bolund L, et al. 2017. Chromatin accessibility and guide sequence secondary structure affect CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing efficiency. FEBS Lett. 591: 1892-1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12707
- Zhang L, Rube HT, Bussemaker HJ, Pufall MA. 2017. The effect of sequence mismatches on binding affinity and endonuclease activity are decoupled throughout the Cas9 binding site. BioRxiv 2017: 176255.
- Zuo Z, Liu J. 2017. Structure and dynamics of Cas9 HNH domain catalytic state. Sci. Rep. 7: 17271.
- Bustin SA, Nolan T. 2020. RT-QPCR testing of SARS-COV-2: a primer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21: 3004.
- Van Der Meide W, Guerra J, Schoone G, Farenhorst M, Coelho L, Faber W, et al. 2008. Comparison between quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, and real-time PCR for quantification of Leishmania parasites. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01416-07
- Peleg-Chen D, Shuvali G, Brio L, Ifrach A, Iancu O, Barbiro-Michaely E, et al. 2022. Microfluidic tool for rapid functional characterization of CRISPR complexes. N. Biotechnol. 68: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2022.01.003
- Baeyens WRG, Schulman SG, Calokerinos AC, Zhao Y, Campana G, Nakashima K, et al. 1998. Chemiluminescence-based detection: principles and analytical applications in flowing streams and in immunoassays. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 17: 6-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00062-4
- Yourik P, Fuchs RT, Mabuchi M, Curcuru JL, Robb GB. 2019. Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 is a multiple-turnover enzyme. RNA 25: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.067355.118
- Richardson CD, Ray GJ, DeWitt MA, Curie GL, Corn JE. 2016. Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 34: 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3481
- Raper AT, Stephenson AA, Suo Z. 2018. Functional insights revealed by the kinetic mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 8: 2971-2984. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b13047