대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제39권10호
  • /
  • Pages.151-162
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

임시건축의 개념과 유형별 특성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Concept and Characteristics of Temporary Architecture by Typology

  • 투고 : 2023.07.02
  • 심사 : 2023.09.18
  • 발행 : 2023.10.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In today's changing society, temporary architecture is gaining importance as an alternative construction approach due to shifting demands. This study explores the concept and characteristics of temporary architecture by focusing on its temporal properties and its relationship with events and functions. Examples of temporary architecture from the post-2000 era were analyzed and categorized, offering a fresh understanding of its relevance in contemporary contexts. In particular, an analytical framework based on 'temporality' and 'formality' was used to define the scope of temporary architecture and facilitate case analysis. Temporary architecture was classified into two categories: 'Fundamental Typology' and 'Expanded Typology', with subcategories based on factors like duration, relocation and reinstallation, spatial context, and urban function. Furthermore, temporary architecture, when viewed through an avant-garde perspective, serves as a critique of mainstream architecture, challenging the industrialization and standardization of modernity. From this viewpoint, temporary architecture becomes a vehicle for participatory and practical architecture, reshaping architectural boundaries. This study aims to broaden the discussion surrounding temporary architecture, encompassing historical, artistic, and societal aspects to establish its concept and contemporary significance. A 'typological classification system' was proposed to support future analyses of temporary architecture.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2023년 중앙대학교 CAU GRS 지원을 받아 작성됨.

참고문헌

  1. Aiello, C. (2015). Temporal Architecture, New York, eVolo Press, 5.
  2. Baker, L. (2014). Temporary Architecture, Salenstein, Braun Publishing, 6.
  3. Bonnemaison, S., & Macy, C. (2007). Festival Architecture, London: Routledge, 1-3.
  4. Calinescu, M. (1993). Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism (Lee, Y. W., Trans.) Seoul, Visual and Language. (Original work published 1987), 48.
  5. Cheon, E. Y. (2001). A study on the 'new relationship' of modern architecture in Bernard Tschumi's 'Architecture and Separation', Kyonggi University Graduate School of Architecture Research, 5, 30.
  6. Feireiss, L. (2007). Spacecraft: Fleeting Architecture and Hideouts, Berlin, Gestalten, 4.
  7. Frearson, A. (2016, May 17). MVRDV completes giant scaffolding staircase in Rotterdam city centre, Dezeen, https://www.dezeen.com/2016/05/17/mvrdv-the-stairs-giant-scaffolding-installation-groot-handelsgebouw-rotterdam/
  8. Hwang, G. S. (2013). The traditional knowledge and cultural aspects about the Mongolian Ger, Asian Comparative Folklore Society, 52(12), 276-280.
  9. IKEA Foundation. (2015, March 24). IKEA Foundation and UNHCR ready to improve life for thousands of refugee families. https://ikeafoundation.org/press/better-shelter-ikea-foundation-and-unhcr-ready-to-improve-life-for-thousands-of-refugee-families/.
  10. IKEA Museum. (n.d.). The story of IKEA flatpacks, https://ikeamuseum.com/en/explore/the-story-of-ikea/flatpacks/
  11. Jodidio, P. (2011). Temporary Architecture Now!, Cologne, Taschen, 6.
  12. Kang, H. & Jung, Y. S. (2003). A Study on the crisis of monumentality, Korea Association for Architectural History, 12(1), 20-22.
  13. Kim, K. H. (2018). Technology of Time, Architecture Lectures-9, Seoul, An Graphics, 69, 77.
  14. Kim, K. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2012). Temporary buildings trend and its build methods type characteristic in the recent years, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(10), 123-130.
  15. Kipnis, J. (1993). Towards a. New Architecture. In Lynn, G. (Ed.), Profile 102/ AD 63: Folding in Architecture, New Jersey, Wiley-Academy, 57-65.
  16. Kuma, K. (1999). Shaking the Foundation Japanese Architect in Dialogue, Munich, New York, Prestel, 38.
  17. Noever, P. et al. (1996). New Modernism and Deconstructivism 1 (Kim, K. .J., Trans.) Seoul, Cheongram Publishing House. (Original work published 1991), 77.
  18. Paregron Forum, (2015). Pavilion, filling the city with emotions, Seoul, Hongshi Communication, 55-58, 146.
  19. Society of Architecture. (2017). Yoonseul: Manridong Reflecting Seoul, http://societyofarchitecture.com/project/yoonsulmanridong-reflects-seoul/.
  20. Steven Holl Architects. (1993). Description of Storefront for Art and Architecture, https://www.stevenholl.com/project/storefront-for-art-and-architecture/.
  21. Stott, R. (2014, June 27). The Organic Mushroom-Brick Tower Opens at MoMA's PS1 Courtyard, https://www.archdaily.com/521266/hy-fi-the-organic-mushroom-brick-tower-opens-at-moma-s-ps1-courtyard.
  22. Sweeney, C. (2016, October 31). MVRDV's Giant Staircase in Rotterdam. Azure. https://www.azuremagazine.com/article/out-now-our-may-june-2023-issue-on-workplace-futures
  23. The Living. (2014). Hy-Fi, http://www.thelivingnewyork.com/index.html/.
  24. Till, J. (2012), Architecture Depends (Lee, H. Trans.) Seoul, Spacetime. (Original work published 2009), 130-183.
  25. Tschumi, B. (1994). Architecture and Disjunction, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 14-16.
  26. Tschumi, B. (2003). Bernard Tschumi, London, New York, Thames & Hudson, 13.
  27. Yi, D. A. (1995). Architecture as a Temporal Art, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 39(9), 51.