Animal Bioscience

  • 제36권11호
  • /
  • Pages.1619-1631
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of dietary fiber in gestating sow diets - A review

  • Hyunwoong Jo (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Beob Gyun Kim (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2023.06.02
  • 심사 : 2023.08.12
  • 발행 : 2023.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The objective of this review was to provide an overview of the effects of dietary fiber (DF) on reproductive performance in gestating sows. Dietary fibers have been suggested to modulate microbiota in the intestine and the immune system of gestating sows and to improve gut health. Thus, DF may help alleviate the adverse effects of the stressful production cycle of gestating sows. These benefits may subsequently result in improved reproductive performance of sows. Previous studies have reported changes in microbiota by providing gestating sows with DF, and the responses of microbiota varied depending on the source of DF. The responses by providing DF to gestating sows were inconsistent for antioxidative capacity, hormonal response, and inflammatory response among the studies. The effects of DF on reproductive performance were also inconsistent among the previous studies. Potential reasons contributing to these inconsistent results would include variability in reproductive performance data, insufficient replication, influence of other nutrients contained in the DF diets, characteristics of DF, and experimental periods. The present meta-analysis suggests that increasing the total DF concentration by 10 percentage units (e.g., 12% to 22% as-fed basis) in gestating sow diets compared to the control group improves the litter born alive by 0.49 pigs per litter. However, based on the present review, questions remain regarding the benefits of fibers in gestating sow diets. Further research is warranted to clarify the mode of action of fibers and the association with subsequent reproductive performance in gestating sows.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Oliviero C, Heinonen M, Valros A, Peltoniemi O. Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;119:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.009
  2. Oliviero C, Junnikkala S, Peltoniemi O. The challenge of large litters on the immune system of the sow and the piglets. Reprod Domest Anim 2019;54:12-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13463
  3. Andersson E, Frossling J, Engblom L, Algers B, Gunnarsson S. Impact of litter size on sow stayability in Swedish commercial piglet producing herds. Acta Vet Scand 2015;58:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-016-0213-8
  4. Schild S-LA, Foldager L, Rangstrup-Christensen L, Pedersen LJ. Characteristics of piglets born by two highly prolific sow hybrids. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00355
  5. Ju M, Wang X, Li X, et al. Effects of litter size and parity on farrowing duration of Landrace×Yorkshire sows. Animals 2022;12:94. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010094
  6. Cao M, Li Y, Wu QJ, et al. Effects of dietary Clostridium butyricum addition to sows in late gestation and lactation on reproductive performance and intestinal microbiota. J Anim Sci 2019;97:3426-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz186
  7. Liu H, Wang S, Zhang D, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with Pediococcus acidilactici ZPA017 on reproductive performance, fecal microbial flora and serum indices in sows during late gestation and lactation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2020;33:120-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0764
  8. Hu J, Kim YH, Kim IH. Effects of two bacillus strains probiotic supplement on reproduction performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, fecal score, excreta odor contents and fecal microflora in lactation sows, and growth performance in sucking piglets. Livest Sci 2021;244:104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104293
  9. Shang Q, Liu H, Liu S, He T, Piao X. Effects of dietary fiber sources during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, milk quality, and intestinal health in piglets. J Anim Sci 2019;97:4922-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz278
  10. Li Y, He J, Zhang L, et al. Effects of dietary fiber supplementation in gestation diets on sow performance, physiology and milk composition for successive three parities. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2021;276:114945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114945
  11. Reese D. Dietary fiber in sow gestation diets-a review. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska; 1997. Nebraska Swine Reports 229.
  12. Reese D, Prosch A, Travnicek DA, Eskridge KM. Dietary fiber in sow gestation diets-an updated review. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska; 2008. Nebraska Swine Reports 45.
  13. Berchieri-Ronchi C, Kim S, Zhao Y, Correa CR, Yeum KJ, Ferreira ALA. Oxidative stress status of highly prolific sows during gestation and lactation. Animal 2011;5:1774-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000772
  14. Tummaruk P, Sang-Gassanee K. Effect of farrowing duration, parity number and the type of anti-inflammatory drug on postparturient disorders in sows: a clinical study. Trop Anim Health Prod 2013;45:1071-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0315-x
  15. Oliviero C, Kothe S, Heinonen M, Valros A, Peltoniemi O. Prolonged duration of farrowing is associated with subsequent decreased fertility in sows. Theriogenology 2013;79:1095-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.02.005
  16. Pearodwong P, Muns R, Tummaruk P. Prevalence of constipation and its influence on post-parturient disorders in tropical sows. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48:525-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0984-3
  17. Pedersen TF, Van Vliet S, Bruun TS, Theil PK. Feeding sows during the transition period-is a gestation diet, a simple transition diet, or a lactation diet the best choice? Transl Anim Sci 2020;4:34-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz155
  18. Lu D, Pi Y, Ye H, et al. Consumption of dietary fiber with different physicochemical properties during late pregnancy alters the gut microbiota and relieves constipation in sow model. Nutrients 2022;14:2511. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122511
  19. Tan CQ, Wei HK, Sun HQ, et al. Effects of supplementing sow diets during two gestations with konjac flour and Saccharomyces boulardii on constipation in peripartal period, lactation feed intake and piglet performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015;210:254-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.10.013
  20. Sonnenburg ED, Sonnenburg JL. Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates. Cell Metab 2014;20:779-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.003
  21. Jha R, Fouhse JM, Tiwari UP, Li L, Willing BP. Dietary fiber and intestinal health of monogastric animals. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00048
  22. Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:478-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1373
  23. Nowland TL, Plush KJ, Barton M, Kirkwood RN. Development and function of the intestinal microbiome and potential implications for pig production. Animals 2019;9:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030076
  24. Lee YK, Mazmanian SK. Has the microbiota played a critical role in the evolution of the adaptive immune system? Science 2010;330:1768-73. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195568
  25. Brestoff JR, Artis D. Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Nat Immunol 2013;14:676-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2640
  26. Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature 2008; 453:620-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07008
  27. Handelsman J. Microbial symbiosis: in sickness and in health. DNA Cell Biol 2009;28:359-60. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2009.1507
  28. Chow J, Lee SM, Shen Y, Khosravi A, Mazmanian SK. Host-bacterial symbiosis in health and disease. Adv Immunol 2010;107:243-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381300-8.00008-3
  29. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, et al. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms 2019;7:14. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7010014
  30. Stojanov S, Berlec A, Strukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms 2020;8:1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111715
  31. Abenavoli L, Scarpellini E, Colica C, et al. Gut microbiota and obesity: a role for probiotics. Nutrients 2019;11:2690. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112690
  32. Shen ZH, Zhu CX, Quan YS, et al. Relationship between intestinal microbiota and ulcerative colitis: Mechanisms and clinical application of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:5-14. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.5
  33. Jha R, Berrocoso JFD. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;212:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.12.002
  34. Kimura I, Ozawa K, Inoue D, et al. The gut microbiota suppresses insulin-mediated fat accumulation via the shortchain fatty acid receptor GPR43. Nat Commun 2013;4:1829. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2852
  35. Xu C, Cheng C, Zhang X, Peng J. Inclusion of soluble fiber in the gestation diet changes the gut microbiota, affects plasma propionate and odd-chain fatty acids levels, and Improves insulin sensitivity in sows. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020635
  36. Li H, Ma L, Zhang L, et al. Dietary inulin regulated gut microbiota and improved neonatal health in a pregnant sow model. Front Nutr 2021;8:716723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.716723
  37. Liu B, Zhu X, Cui Y, et al. Consumption of dietary fiber from different sources during pregnancy alters sow gut microbiota and improves performance and reduces inflammation in sows and piglets. mSystems 2021;6:e00591-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00591-20
  38. Vallet JL, Miles JR, Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA. Proportion of the litter farrowed, litter size, and progesterone and estradiol effects on piglet birth intervals and stillbirths. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;119:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.11.004
  39. Levasseur MC. Utero-ovarian relationships in placental mammals: role of uterus and embryo in the regulation of progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum. a review. Reprod Nutr Dev 1983;23:793-816. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19830601
  40. Ferguson EM, Slevin J, Hunter MG, Edwards SA, Ashworth CJ. Beneficial effects of a high fibre diet on oocyte maturity and embryo survival in gilts. Reproduction 2007;133:433-9. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0018
  41. Catalano PM. Obesity, insulin resistance and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 2010;140:365-71. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0088
  42. Pere MC, Etienne M. Insulin sensitivity during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning in primiparous gilts. J Anim Sci 2007;85:101-10. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-130
  43. Quesnel H, Meunier-Salaun MC, Hamard A, et al. Dietary fiber for pregnant sows: influence on sow physiology and performance during lactation. J Anim Sci 2009;87:532-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1231
  44. Loisel F, Farmer C, Ramaekers P, Quesnel H. Effects of high fiber intake during late pregnancy on sow physiology, colostrum production, and piglet performance. J Anim Sci 2013;91:5269-79. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6526
  45. Oelke CA, Ribeiro AML, Noro M, et al. Effect of different levels of total dietary fiber on the performance of sows in gestation and lactation. Rev Bras Zootecn 2018;47:e20170299. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4720170299
  46. Li H, Liu Z, Lyu H, et al. Effects of dietary inulin during late gestation on sow physiology, farrowing duration and piglet performance. Anim Reprod Sci 2020;219:106531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106531
  47. Blundell JE, Goodson S, Halford JCG. Regulation of appetite: role of leptin in signalling systems for drive and satiety. Int J Obes 2001;25(Suppl 1):S29-S34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801693
  48. Wang Z, Chen Y, Wang W, et al. Dietary supplementation with fine-grinding wheat bran improves lipid metabolism and inflammatory response via modulating the gut microbiota structure in pregnant sow. Front Microbiol 2022;13:835950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.835950
  49. Hassanzadeh-Rostami Z, Faghih S. Effect of dietary fiber on serum leptin level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2021;129:322-33. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0998-3883
  50. Farmer C, Robert S, Matte JJ. Lactation performance of sows fed a bulky diet during gestation and receiving growth hormone-releasing factor during lactation. J Anim Sci 1996;74:1298-306. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7461298x
  51. Farmer C, Robert S, Rushen J. Bromocriptine given orally to periparturient of lactating sows inhibits milk production. J Anim Sci 1998;76:750-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.763750x
  52. Agyekum AK, Columbus DA, Farmer C, Beaulieu AD. Effects of supplementing processed straw during late gestation on sow physiology, lactation feed intake, and offspring body weight and carcass quality. J Anim Sci 2019;97:3958-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz242
  53. Lepe M, Gascon MB, Castaneda-Gonzalez L, Morales MEP, Cruz AJ. Effect of maternal obesity on lactation: systematic review. Nutr Hosp 2011;26:1266-9. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2011.26.6.5388
  54. Kim SH, Bennett PR, Terzidou V. Advances in the role of oxytocin receptors in human parturition. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2017;449:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.01.034
  55. Aulinas A, Pulumo RL, Asanza E, et al. Endogenous oxytocin levels in relation to food intake, menstrual phase, and age in females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104:1348-56. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-02036
  56. Webel DM, Finck BN, Baker DH, Johnson RW. Time course of increased plasma cytokines, cortisol, and urea nitrogen in pigs following intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci 1997;75:1514-20. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7561514x
  57. Meunier-Salaun MC, Edwards SA, Robert S. Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted fed sow. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;90:53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00196-1
  58. Sapkota A, Marchant-Forde JN, Richert BT, Lay Jr DC. Including dietary fiber and resistant starch to increase satiety and reduce aggression in gestating sows. J Anim Sci 2016;94:2117-27. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-0013
  59. Huang S, Wei J, Yu H, et al. Effects of dietary fiber sources during gestation on stress status, abnormal behaviors and reproductive performance of sows. Animals 2020;10:141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010141
  60. Holt JP, Johnston LJ, Baidoo SK, Shurson GC. Effects of a high-fiber diet and frequent feeding on behavior, reproductive performance, and nutrient digestibility in gestating sows. J Anim Sci 2006;84:946-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844946x
  61. Chen L, Deng H, Cui H, et al. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2018;9:7204-18. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23208
  62. Shang Q, Liu S, Liu H, Mahfuz S, Piao X. Impact of sugar beet pulp and wheat bran on serum biochemical profile, inflammatory responses and gut microbiota in sows during late gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00573-3
  63. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MTD, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:44-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001
  64. Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol 2014;24:PR453-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034
  65. Rezaie A, Parker RD, Abdollahi M. Oxidative stress and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: an epiphenomenon or the cause? Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:2015-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9622-2
  66. Therond P, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Davit-Spraul A, Conti M, Legrand A. Biomarkers of oxidative stress: an analytical approach. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2000;3:373-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075197-200009000-00009
  67. Mueller A, Koebnick C, Binder H, et al. Placental defence is considered sufficient to control lipid peroxidation in pregnancy. Med Hypotheses 2005;64:553-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2004.08.008
  68. Li Y, Liu H, Zhang L, et al. Maternal dietary fiber composition during gestation induces changes in offspring antioxidative capacity, inflammatory response, and gut microbiota in a sow model. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010031
  69. Huang S, Wei J, Yu H, et al. Effects of dietary fiber sources during gestation on stress status, abnormal behaviors and reproductive performance of sows. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010141
  70. Liu Y, Chen N, Li D, et al. Effects of dietary soluble or insoluble fiber intake in late gestation on litter performance, milk composition, immune function, and redox status of sows around parturition. J Anim Sci 2020;98:skaa303. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa303
  71. Li Y, Zhang L, Liu H, et al. Effects of the ratio of insoluble fiber to soluble fiber in gestation diets on sow performance and offspring intestinal development. Animals 2019;9:422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070422
  72. Camp Montoro J, Sola-Oriol D, Muns R, Gasa J, Llanes N, Manzanilla EG. Blood and faecal biomarkers to assess dietary energy, protein and amino acid efficiency of utilization by growing and finishing pigs. Porc Health Manag 2022;8:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00273-y
  73. George PB, England DC, Siers DG, Stanton HC. Diabetogenic effects of pregnancy in sows on plasma glucose and insulin release. J Anim Sci 1978;46:1694-700. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.4661694x
  74. Schaefer AL, Tong AKW, Sather AP, Beltranena E, Pharazyn A, Aherne FX. Preparturient diabetogenesis in primiparous gilts. Can J Anim Sci 1991;71:69-77. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-008
  75. Lin LH, Lin J, Yan JY. Interactive affection of pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity, excessive gestational weight gain and glucose tolerance test characteristics on adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol 2022;13:942271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.942271
  76. Jha R, Berrocoso JD. Review: Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. Animal 2015;9:1441-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731115000919
  77. Agyekum AK, Nyachoti CM. Nutritional and metabolic consequences of feeding high-fiber diets to swine: a review. Engineering 2017;3:716-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Eng.2017.03.010
  78. Younes H, Garleb K, Behr S, Remesy C, Demigne C. Fermentable fibers or oligosaccharides reduce urinary nitrogen excretion by increasing urea disposal in the rat cecum. J Nutr 1995;125:1010-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/125.4.1010
  79. Laws J, Juniper DT, Lean IJ, et al. Supplementing sow diets with palm oil during late gestation and lactation: effects on milk production, sow hormonal profiles and growth and development of her offspring. Animal 2018;12:2578-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000885
  80. Tarini J, Wolever TMS. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010;35:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1139/H09-119
  81. LeBlanc JG, Chain F, Martin R, et al. Beneficial effects on host energy metabolism of short-chain fatty acids and vitamins produced by commensal and probiotic bacteria. Microb Cell Fact 2017;16:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0691-z
  82. Fernandes J, Vogt J, Wolever TMS. Inulin increases short-term markers for colonic fermentation similarly in healthy and hyperinsulinaemic humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:1279-86. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.116
  83. Pryde SE, Duncan SH, Hold GL, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002;217:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.x
  84. Genda T, Kondo T, Sugiura S, et al. Bacterial fermentation of water-soluble cellulose acetate raises large-bowel acetate and propionate and decreases plasma cholesterol concentrations in rats. J Agric Food Chem 2018;66:11909-16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04093
  85. Grieshop CM, Reese DE, Fahey GF. Nonstarch polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. In: swine nutrition. 2 ed. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press; 2001. pp. 107-30.
  86. Aaron DK, Hays VW. How many pigs? Statistical power considerations in swine nutrition experiments. J Anim Sci 2004;82:E245-E54. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8213_supplE245x
  87. Renteria-Flores JA, Johnston LJ, Shurson GC, Moser RL, Webel SK. Effect of soluble and insoluble dietary fiber on embryo survival and sow performance. J Anim Sci 2008;86:2576-84. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0376
  88. Mou D, Li S, Yan C, et al. Dietary fiber sources for gestation sows: Evaluations based on combined in vitro and in vivo methodology. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;269:114636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114636
  89. Tan CQ, Sun HQ, Wei HK, et al. Effects of soluble fiber inclusion in gestation diets with varying fermentation characteristics on lactational feed intake of sows over two successive parities. Animal 2018;12:1388-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003019
  90. Li Y, Yang M, Zhang L, et al. Dietary fiber supplementation in gestating sow diet improved fetal growth and placental development and function through serotonin signaling pathway. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:831703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.831703
  91. Matte JJ, Robert S, Girard CL, Farmer C, Martineau GP. Effect of bulky diets based on wheat bran or oat hulls on reproductive performance of sows during their first two parities. J Anim Sci 1994;72:1754-60. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7271754x
  92. Yu M, Gao T, Liu Z, Diao X. Effects of dietary supplementation with high fiber (stevia residue) on the fecal flora of pregnant sows. Animals 2020;10:2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122247
  93. Zhuo Y, Feng B, Xuan Y, et al. Inclusion of purified dietary fiber during gestation improved the reproductive performance of sows. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020;11:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00450-5
  94. Weng RC. Dietary supplementation with different types of fiber in gestation and lactation: effects on sow serum biochemical values and performance. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2020;33:1323-31. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0545
  95. Shi B, He W, Su G, Xu X, Shan A. The effect of increasing neutral detergent fiber level through different fiber feed ingredients throughout the gestation of sows. Animals 2021; 11:415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020415
  96. Jaworski NW, Laerke HN, Bach Knudsen KE, Stein HH. Carbohydrate composition and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and nonstarch polysaccharides in corn, sorghum, and wheat and coproducts from these grains. J Anim Sci 2015;93:1103-13. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8147
  97. Darroch CS, Dove CR, Maxwell CV, et al. A regional evaluation of the effect of fiber type in gestation diets on sow reproductive performance. J Anim Sci 2008;86:1573-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0662
  98. Veum TL, Crenshaw JD, Crenshaw TD, et al. The addition of ground wheat straw as a fiber source in the gestation diet of sows and the effect on sow and litter performance for three successive parities. J Anim Sci 2009;87:1003-12. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1119