Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회지)

The Economic Geographical Society of Korea (한국경제지리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

From Industrial Clusters to Innovation Districts: Metropolitan Industrial Innovations and Governance

산업클러스터에서 혁신지구로: 도시의 산업혁신과 거버넌스

  • Keebom Nahm (Department of Urban Sociology, University of Seoul)
  • 남기범 (서울시립대 도시사회학과 )
  • Received : 2023.09.21
  • Published : 2023.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aims to synthesize the discussion of the innovation district and suggest an alternative to the governance system of the innovation district. Cluster policies that focus on industrial specialization, networking, value chains, and industrial ecosystems have shown some problems and limits in advanced industrial economies. The innovation district, suitable for the era of urban innovation, convergence of industry, housing, leisure, and related variety, emphasizes cooperation through the convergence of various innovations, workshops and industries, and communities. It is important to build a quintuple helix based on cooperative governance through public-private partnerships, integrate the physical and cultural atmosphere, and service industries that strengthen the place prestige. Beyond the industrial aspect, innovation districts can facilitate changes in urban amenities and lifestyles and creative atmosphere, such as diversity, lifestyle, charms, and openness, and promote social vitality and economic interactions. The governance of innovative districts can promote inter-organizational exchanges, and combinations. When knowledge is created through exchanges between companies, it also affects changes in the governance system, evolving from a rigid and centralized system to an open, dynamic, and organic system. Through the innovation policy, the existing Central Business Districts (CBD) can be able to be transformed into a Central Lifestyle Districts (CLD).

본 연구는 혁신지구의 논의를 종합하고 혁신지구의 거버넌스 대안을 제시한다. 산업특화와 네트워킹, 가치사슬과 산업생태계에 중점을 두었던 클러스터정책은 이제는 한계를 노정하고 있다. 도시혁신의 시대, 산업, 주거, 여가의 융복합시대, 연관다양성의 시대에 적합한 혁신지구는, 다양한 중소규모의 혁신, 공방과 산업의 융복합으로 인한 협력과 대도시지역의 다양한 기반자원을 활용하고, 지역사회와의 통합성과 포용성을 강조한다. 민관 파트너십에 의한 협력적 거버넌스에 기반한 퀸터플 헬릭스의 구축, 장소성과 장소의 위신을 강화하는 물리적, 문화적 환경, 서비스업과의 융합이 중요하다. 산업적 측면을 넘어서 혁신지구는 도시 에메니티와 생활양식의 변화를 추동하고, 창조적 분위기 즉, 다양성, 생활양식, 매력, 개방성 등을 만들어내고, 이벤트, 거리예술, 야간활동 등 다양한 사회, 문화적 측면들과 밀접하게 연결되어 사회적 활력과 경제적 상호작용을 증진한다. 혁신지구 거버넌스는 기업 간 교환, 조합, 지식과 자원의 창출을 촉진한다. 나아가 기업 간 교환에 의해 지식이 창출되면 거버넌스 체제의 변화에도 영향을 주어, 경직적이고 중앙집중적인 체제에서 개방적, 역동적, 유기적 체제로 진화하게 된다. 혁신지구 정책을 통해 기존의 중심업무지구(CBD)는 중심활력지구(CLD)로 변모할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년도 서울시립대학교 교내학술연구비에 의하여 지원되었음.

References

  1. 구양미, 2022, "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems(기업가적 생태계) 개념과 시사점," 한국경제지리학회지 25(1), pp.1-22. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2022.25.1.1
  2. 남기범, 2016, " '선택과 집중'의 종언: 포스트클러스터 지역산업정책의 논거와 방향," 한국경제지리학회지 19(4), pp.764-781. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2016.19.4.764
  3. 유강은 역, 2010, 미국 대도시의 죽음과 삶, 서울: 그린비(=Jacobs, J., 1992, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, NY: Random House).
  4. 이종호.이철우, 2016, "스마트전문화 전략 및 트리플헬릭스 혁신체계와 클러스터 정책의 연계를 통한 대안적 지역산업정책의 모색," 한국경제지리학회지 19(4), pp.799-811. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2016.19.4.799
  5. 이종호.장후은, 2019, "유럽의 산업위기지역 지원정책 추진 동향 및 시사점," 한국경제지리학회지 22(3), pp.246-257. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2019.22.3.246
  6. 이종호.장후은, 2020, "국가주도형에서 지역주도형으로: 일본의 지역과학기술정책 패러다임 전환과 그 특성 고찰," 한국지역지리학회지 26(4), pp.409-423. https://doi.org/10.26863/JKARG.2020.11.26.4.409
  7. 이철우, 2020, 산업집적의 경제지리학, 서울: 푸른길.
  8. 정미애.김형주, 2017, "도시형 혁신공간의 부상과 동향," 동향과 이슈 40, pp.1-19.
  9. 하정석, 2022, "산업공간으로서 메이커스페이스의 도시성(urbanism)과 장소성(placeness)," 한국경제지리학회지 25(4), pp.547-567. https://doi.org/10.23841/EGSK.2022.25.4.547
  10. 한은정.홍순구, 2017, "산업생태계의 기술혁신과 가치창출 구조변화," 기술혁신학회지 20(1), pp.175-204.
  11. 한정화, 2017, "중소기업 정책패러다임의 전환에 관한 연구," 중소기업연구 39(4), pp.159-179.
  12. 홍운선, 2017, 지역혁신체계 강화를 통한 지방 중소기업 혁신생태계 조성, 중소기업연구원.
  13. Alfken, C., Broekel, T. and Sternberg, R., 2015, "Factors explaining the spatial agglomeration fo the creative class: Empirical evidence for German artists," European Planning Studies 23, pp.2438-2463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.979767
  14. Anne, T. and Robert, M., 2018, Assessing Your Innovation District: A How-to Guide, Washington, DC: The Brookings.
  15. Bahlmann, M. and Huysman, M. H., 2008, "The emergence of a knowledge-based view of clusters and its implications for cluster governance," The Information Society 24(5), pp.304-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802356075
  16. Bartelings, J., et al., 2017. "The nature of orchestrational work," Public Management Review 19(3), pp.342-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1209233
  17. Blakely, E. and Hu, R., 2019, Crafting Innovative Places for Australia's Knowledge Economy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A. and Herremans, I., 2010, "When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy," Journal of Business Ethics 95, pp.297-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1
  19. Brenner, N., 2018, "Debating planetary urbanization: For an engaged pluralism," Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36(3), pp.570-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818757510
  20. Brenner, N. and Schmid, C., 2014, "The 'Urban Age' in question," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(3), pp.731-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115
  21. Brenner, T. and Schlump, C., 2011. "Policy measures and their effects in the different phases of the cluster life cycle," Regional Studies 45(10), pp.1363-1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.529116
  22. Bugge, M., 2011, "Jacobian cluster mutation across advertising and internet-based market communication," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 102(5), pp.515-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00652.x
  23. Cabanelas, P., et al., 2017, "The governance of regional research networks: Lessons from Spain," Regional Studies 51(7), pp.1008-1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1150589
  24. Carayannis, E. and Campbell, D., 2019, Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems: How Social Ecology and Environmental Protection are Driving Innovation, Sustainable Development and Economic Growth, Cham: Springer.
  25. Carlino, G. and Kerr, W., 2014, Agglomeration and Innovation, NBER Working Paper 20367, Cambridge, Mass.: NBER.
  26. Carvalho, L. and van Winden, W., 2017, "Planned knowledge locations in cities: studying emergence and change," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development 8(1), pp.47-67. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2017.10003161
  27. Castells, M., 2014, Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes, New York, NY: Routledge.
  28. Charnock, G. and Ribera-Fumaz, R., 2011, "'A new space for knowledge and people'? Henri Lefebvre, representations of space, and the production of '22@Barcelona'," Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(3), pp.613-632. https://doi.org/10.1068/d17009
  29. Chatman, D. G., Noland, R. B. and Klein, N. J., 2016, "Firm births, access to transit, and agglomeration in Portland, Oregon, and Dallas, Texas," Transportation Research Record 2598(1), pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2598-01
  30. Clark, G., Moonen, T. and Couturier, J., 2016, Building the Innovation Economy: City-Level Strategies for Planning, Placemaking, and Promotion, Case Study: San Diego. London, UK: Urban Land Institute.
  31. Cohen, B. and Munoz, P., 2016, The Emergence of the Urban Entrepreneur: How the Growth of Cities and the Sharing Economy Are Driving a New Breed of Innovators, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  32. Coletti, M., 2010, "Technology and industrial clusters: How different are they to manage?," Science and Public Policy 37(9), pp.679-688. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X12778118264413
  33. Credit, K., 2018, "Transit-oriented economic development: The impact of light rail on new business starts in the Phoenix, AZ Region, USA," Urban Studies 55(13), pp.2838-2862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017724119
  34. Dagnino, G., et al., 2016, "Structural dynamics and intentional governance in strategic interorganizational network evolution: A multilevel approach," Organization Studies 37(3), pp.349-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615625706
  35. Diaz-Garcia, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A. and Saez-Martinez, F., 2013, "Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation," Innovation 15(2), pp.149-160. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149
  36. Drucker, J. and Kayanan, C., 2023, "Innovation districts: Assessing their potential as a strategy for urban economic development," Urban Affairs Review DOI: 10.1177/10780874231173618.
  37. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T. and Guaralda, M., 2016, "Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis?: A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge Based Development 7(1), pp.4-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.075444
  38. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M. and Kamruzzaman, M., 2018, "Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach," Land Use Policy 76, pp.471-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.027
  39. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, Md. and Guaralda, M., 2020, "Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper," Land Use Policy 90, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104166.
  40. Fang, L. and Drucker, J., 2021, "How spatially concentrated are industrial clusters? A meta-analysis," Journal of Planning Literature 36(4), pp.526-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211012921
  41. Florida, R., 2014, The Rise of the Creative Class: Revisited, New York, NY: Basic Books.
  42. Florida, R., Adler, P. and Mellander, C., 2017, "The city as innovation machine," Regional Studies 51(1), pp.86-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255324
  43. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J., 2005, "Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems," Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30, pp.441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  44. Frey, W.H., 2018, The Millennial Generation: A Demographic Bridge to America's Diverse Future, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  45. Gagne, M., et al., 2010, "Technology cluster evaluation and growth factors: Literature review," Research Evaluation 19(2), pp.82-90. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X510124
  46. Garreau, J., 1992, Edge City: Life on the New Frontier, New York: Anchor Books.
  47. Gereffi, G. and Lee, J., 2016, "Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters," Journal of Business Ethics 133(1), pp.25-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2373-7
  48. Gianoli, A. and Henkes, R., 2020, "The evolution and adaptive governance of the 22@ Innovation District in Barcelona," Urban Science 4(2), DOI: 10.3390/urbansci4020016.
  49. Glaeser, E., 2022, "What can developing cities today learn from the urban past?" Regional Scence and Urban Economics 94, 13698. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103698.
  50. Glaeser, E. and Gottlieb, J., 2008, The Economics of place-making policies, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp.155-239.
  51. Hamidi, S. and Zandiatashbar, A., 2019, "Does urban form matter for innovation productivity? A national multi-level study of the association between neighborhood innovation capacity and urban sprawl," Urban Studies 56(8), pp.1576-1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018767002
  52. Hansen, H. K. and Winther, L., 2012, The Urban Turn: Cities, Talent and Knowledge in Denmark, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  53. Hawken, S. and Han, J.H., 2017, "Innovation districts and urban heterogeneity: 3D mapping of industry mix in downtown Sydney," Journal of Urban Design 22(5), pp.568-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1301203
  54. Huang, K., 2023, City as the Infrastructure of Innovation: Insights and Proposals for Shaping Shenzhen's Innovation Districts and Knowledge-based Industry, MA thesis, MIT.
  55. Ingstrup, M. and Damgaard, T., 2013, "Cluster facilitation from a cluster life cycle perspective," European Planning Studies 21(4), pp.556-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722953
  56. Jacobs, J., 1970, The Economy of Cities, Jonathan Cape.
  57. Janssen, M. and van der Voort, H., 2016, "Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government," Government Information Quarterly 33(1), pp.1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
  58. Kang, C., Fan, D. and Jiao, H., 2021, "Validating activity, time, and space diversity as essential components of urban vitality," EPB: Urban Analytics and City Science 48(5), pp.1180-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320919771
  59. Katz, B. and Bradley, J., 2013, The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  60. Katz, B. and Nowak, J., 2018, The New Localism: How Cities Can Thrive in the Age of Populism, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  61. Katz, B. and Wagner, J., 2014, The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  62. Kemeny, T. and Storper, M., 2020, Superstar Cities and Left-behind Places: Disruptive Innovation, Labor Demand, and Interregional Inequality, Monograph No. 41, International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  63. Lan, W. and Zhangliu, W., 2012, "Research on interactive learning, knowledge sharing andcollective innovation in smes cluster," International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology 3(1), pp.24-29.
  64. Lefebvre, P., 2016. Cluster management organizations as intermediary actors of co-evolution between clusters and entrepreneurial firms, in Boari, C. et al., eds, Entrepreneurship and Cluster Dynamics, Routledge.
  65. Lemos, M.C. and Agrawal, A., 2006, "Environmental governance," Annual Review of Environmental Resources 31, pp.297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
  66. Leydesdorff, L., 2012, "The triple helix, quadruple helix,..., and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3(1), pp.25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
  67. Li, J., Webster, D., Cai, J. and Muller, L., 2019, "Innovation clusters revisited: On dimensions of agglomeration, institution, and built-environment," Sustainability 11(12), 3338. DOI: 10.3390/su11123338.
  68. Lorcntzen, A., and van Heur, B., eds., 2012, Cultural Political Economy of Small Cities, Routledge.
  69. Malecki, E. and Poehling, R., 2010, "Extroverts and introverts: Small manufacturers and their information sources," Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 1(3), pp.247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283191
  70. Markovic, J., 2017, "Contingencies and organizing principles in public networks," Public Management Review 19(3), pp.361-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1209237
  71. McCann, E., 2007, "Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: Questions of livability and state strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31(1), pp.188-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00713.x
  72. McGuigan, J., 2010, "Creative labour, cultural work and individualisation," International Journal of Cultural Policy 16(3), pp.323-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630903029658
  73. Meijers, E. and Burger, M., 2017, "Stretching the concept of 'borrowed size'," Urban Studies 54(1), DOI: 10.1177/004209801559764.
  74. Mellander, C., and Florida, R., 2018, "The rise of skills: human capital, the creative class, and regional development," in Fischer, M. and Nijkamp, P., eds, Handbook of Regional Science Berlin: Springer, pp.1-13.
  75. Moretti, E., 2012, The New Geography of Jobs, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  76. Morisson, A., 2018, "A typology of places in the knowledge economy: Towards the fourth place," in Calabro, F., Spina, L. and Bevilacqua, C., eds., New Metropolitan Perspectives: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Springer, pp.444-451.
  77. Nathan, M. and Lee, N., 2013, "Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Firm-level evidence from London," Economic Geography 89(4), pp.367-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12016
  78. Newman, J., M. et al., 2004, "Public Participation and Collaborative Governance," Journal of Social Policy 33(2), pp.203-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279403007499
  79. O'Brien, R., 1992, Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  80. Oldenburg, R., 2000, Celebrating the Third Place: Inspiring Stories about the "Great Good Places" at the Heart of Our Communities, New York: Marlowe & Company.
  81. Pancholia, S., Yigitcanlar, T. and Guaralda, M., 2018, "Societal integration that matters: Place making experience of Macquarie Park Innovation District, Sydney, City," Culture and Society 13, pp.13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.004
  82. Parrilli, M. and Sacchetti, S., 2008, "Linking learning with governance in networks and clusters: Key issues for analysis and policy," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20(5-6), pp.387-408.
  83. Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, M. and Yigitcanlar, T., 2017, "What to assess to model the transport impacts of urban growth? A Delphi approach to examine the space-time suitability of transport indicators," International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 13(8), pp.597-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1491077
  84. Pique, J., et al., 2021, "The role of modern urban science parks in developing entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystems." in Klofsten, M., et al., eds., Handbook of Research on Business and Technology Incubation and Acceleration: A Global Perspective, pp.140-159. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
  85. Provan, K. and Kenis, P., 2008, "Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2), pp.229-252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
  86. Rapetti, C., et al., 2022, " Performance Indicators for the Evolution of Areas of Innovation: Porto Digital Case," Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business 7(2), pp.219-267. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2022.2.j112
  87. Rasche, A. and Esser, D., 2006, "From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability," Journal of Business Ethics 65, pp.251-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y
  88. Richards, G. and Duif, L., 2019, Small Cities with Big Dreams: Creative Placemaking and Branding Strategies, New York: Taylor & Francis.
  89. Rossiter, W. and Price, L., 2013, "Local economic strategy development under Regional Development Agencies and Local Enterprise Partnerships: Applying the lens of the multiple streams framework," Local Economy 28(7-8), pp.852-862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094213500622
  90. Sacchetti, S. and Sugden, R., 2003, "The governance of networks and economic power: the nature and impact of subcontracting relationships," Journal of Economic Surveys 17(5), pp.669-692. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6419.2003.00209.x
  91. Scott, A., 2022, "The constitution of the city and the critique of critical urban theory," Urban Studies 59(6), pp.1105-1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211011028
  92. Scott, A. and Storper, M., 2015, "The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research," 39(1), pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12134
  93. Sharma-Wallace, L., Velarde, S.J., and Wreford, A., 2018, "Adaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence," Journal of Environmental Management 222, pp.174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067
  94. Shearmur, R. and Doloreux, D., 2014, "Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) use and user innovation: high-order services, geographic hierarchies and Internet use in Quebec's manufacturing sector," Regional Studies 49(10), pp.1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.870988
  95. Sonmez, Z., 2017, "Inventor mobility and the geography of knowledge flows: Evidence from the US biopharmaceutical industry," Science and Public Policy 44(5), pp.670-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx001
  96. Sotarauta, M., 2016, Leadership and the City: Power, Strategy and Networks in the Making of Knowledge Cities, London: Routledge.
  97. Storper, M. and Scott, A.J., 2009, "Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth," Journal of Economic Geography 9(2), pp.147-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn052
  98. Teirlinck, P. and Spithoven, A., 2013, "Research collaboration and R&D outsourcing: Different R&D personnel requirements in SMEs," Technovation 33(4-5), pp.142-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.005
  99. Termeer, C.J., Dewulf, A. and Lieshout, M., 2010, "Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance," Ecology and Society 15(4), pp.29-43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03798-150429
  100. Tomaney, J. and Bradley, D., 2007, "The economic role of mobile professional and creative workers and their housing and residential preferences: Evidence from North East England," Town Planning Review 78, pp.511-530. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.78.4.6
  101. Tomlinson, P. and Branston, J., 2017, "Firms, governance and development in industrial districts," Regional Studies 52(10), pp.1410-1422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1324199
  102. UN-Habitat, 2017, Governance, http://unhabitat.org/governance/
  103. Urban Land Institute, 2013, America in 2013: A ULI Survey of Views on Housing, Transportation, and Community 2013, Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
  104. van Winden, W., Carvalho, L., Van Tuijl, E., Van Haaren, J. and Van Berg, D., 2013, Creating Knowledge Locations in Cities, New York: Routledge.
  105. van Winden, W., et al., 2014, Urban Innovation Systems: What Makes Them Tick?, New York: Routledge.
  106. Volgmann, K. and Rusche, K., 2020, "The geography of borrowing size: Exploring spatial distributions for German urban regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 111(1), pp.60-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12362
  107. Wagner, J., 2021. The Global Institute in 2021: Harnessing Innovation Districts to "Build Back Better". Brooklyn, NY: Global Institute on Innovation Districts.
  108. Wagner, J. and Watch, D., 2017, Innovation Space: The New Design of Work, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  109. Wagner, J., Katz, B., and Osha, T., 2019, The Evolution of Innovation Districts: The New Geography of Global Innovation, The Global Institute on Innovation Districts.
  110. Yang, J., 2005, "Commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: A comparison of Atlanta and Boston," The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 35(1), pp.69-78.
  111. Yigitcanlar, T. and Velibeyoglu, K., 2008, "Knowledge-based urban development: The local economic development path of Brisbane, Australia," Local Economy 23(3), pp.195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940802197358
  112. Yu, H., Jiao, J., Houston, E. and Peng, Z.R., 2018, "Evaluating the relationship between rail transit and industrial agglomeration: An observation from the Dallas-fort worth region, TX," Journal of Transportation Geography 67, pp.33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.008
  113. Zandiatashbar, A. and Hamidi, S., 2018, "Impacts of transit and walking amenities on robust local knowledge economy," Cities 81, pp.161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.005
  114. Zandiatashbar, A., Hamidi, S., Foster, N. and Park, K., 2019, "The missing link between place and productivity? The impact of transit-oriented development on the knowledge and creative economy," Journal of Planning Education Research 39(4), pp.429-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19826271
  115. Zhang, M., Partridge, M. D. and Song, H., 2020, "Amenities and the geography of innovation: evidence from Chinese cities," Annals of Regional Science 65, pp.105-145. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-020-00977-5.