References
- Alphablocks. (2013). Alphablocks: Learning is fun with learning blocks: CBeebies shows. Alphablocks BBC B. https://www.learningblocks.tv/alphablocks/home
- Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345
- Brown, A. (1988). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258
- Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp. 87-100). Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
- Cho, M. H. (2010). Confusion in the perception of English anterior coronal consonants by Korean EFL students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(5), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.5.460
- Cho, M. H., & Jeong, S. (2011, May). Perception and confusion of English vowels. Proceedings of the 2011 Spring Korea Contents Association Conference (pp. 353-354).
- Choe, S., Lee, K., & So, Y. (2020). The effects of phonemic awareness instructions on L2 listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4), 1158-1546. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.4.9.1294
- Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Vol. 42). John Benjamins.
- Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171(3968), 303-306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3968.303
- Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
- Fayer, J. M., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37(3), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.x
- Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6
- Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3-83). Cambridge University Press.
- Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040
- Fripp, G. (2023). Overall similarities (OS) perceptual maps template. PerceptualMaps. https://www.perceptualmaps.com
- Georgiou, G. P. (2019). Bit and beat are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children. Language Sciences, 72, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.001
- Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866-877. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196
- Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267-3278. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2062307
- Johnson, K. (2011). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Kang, O., & Moran, M. (2014). Functional loads of pronunciation features in nonnative speakers' oral assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.152
- Kang, O., & Pickering, L. (2013). Acoustic and temporal analysis for assessing speaking. The Companion to Language Assessment, 2, 1047-1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla056
- Lambacher, S., Martens, W., Nelson, B., & Berman, J. (2001). Identification of English voiceless fricatives by Japanese listeners: The influence of vowel context on sensitivity and response bias. Acoustical Science and Technology, 22(5), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.22.334
- Lee, K. (2021). Effects of phonemic awareness instruction on listening comprehension for EFL learners in a Korean elementary school [Unpublished master's thesis]. Seoul National University.
- Lim, Y., & Jang, W. (2019). Speech perception of English fricatives by Korean young learners of English based on L2 acquisition theories. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 27(1), 88-111.
- Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242-1255. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177
- Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874-886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649
- Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 27, 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526
- Morrison, G. S. (2003, August). Perception and production of Spanish vowels by English speakers. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1533-1536).
- Mueller, C. M. (2019). Which English sounds are difficult? Japanese EFL learners' intuitions versus their performance. The Language Teacher, 43(2), 3-8.
- Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684-1696. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2161427
- Rhee, S. C., Chang, J. W., Kim, T. K., Kim, J., Jang, Y. J., Sung, J. H., Rhim, S. K., & Kim, C. (2008). A comparative study on distribution of acoustic cues for Korean /ㅅ/ and /ㅆ/ distinction by native and non-native speakers of Korean. The Journal of Studies in Language, 24(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.24.2.200808.261
- Shepard, R. N. (1972). Psychological representation of speech sounds. In E. E. David, & P. B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view (pp. 67-113). McGraw-Hill.
- Snow, C. (2014). Relevance of the notion of a critical period to language acquisition. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives(pp. 201-228). Psychology Press.
- Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (2021). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional load principle. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858246
- Thomson, R. I. (2018a). English accent coach. EnglishAccentCoach. https://englishaccentcoach.com
- Thomson, R. I. (2018b). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208-231. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
- Wong, J. W. S. (2014, September). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels /ɪ/ and /iː/ by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association(pp. 524-528).
- Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/747800
- Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.54.2.2