Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MIST) (No. RS-2023-00239284).
References
- Joseph AM, Fernandez V, Kritzman S, et al. COVID-19 misinformation on social media: a scoping review. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24601. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24601
- Atigan A. Analysis of YouTube videos on pregnant covid-19 patients during the pandemic period. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e29934. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29934
- Fan KS, Ghani SA, Machairas N, et al. COVID-19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e040487. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040487
- Koskan A, Cantley A, Li R, Silvestro K, Helitzer D. College students' digital media preferences for future HPV vaccine campaigns. J Cancer Educ. 2022;37(6):1743-1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02022-1
- Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
- Verhoeks C, Teunissen D, van der Stelt-Steenbergen A, Lagro-Janssen A. Women's expectations and experiences regarding e-health treatment: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2019;25(3):771-787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217720394
- Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
- Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
- Bidwell S, Jensen MF. E-text on health technology assessment (HTA) information resources. Chapter 3: Using a search protocol to identify sources of information: The COSI model [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2003 [updated 2003 Jun 14, cited 2019 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter3.html#COSI
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.3 [Internet]. Cochrane; 2022 [updated 2022 Feb; cited 2023 Feb 5]. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
- Sajadi KP, Goldman HB. Social networks lack useful content for incontinence. Urology. 2011;78(4):764-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.074
- Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258
- Kiriya J, Edwards P, Roberts I. Effect of emotional content on online video sharing among health care professionals and researchers (DIFFUSION): results and lessons learnt from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e019419. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019419
- Abdulghani HM, Haque S, Ahmad T, et al. A critical review of obstetric and gynecological physical examination videos available on YouTube: content analysis and user engagement evaluation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(30):e16459. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016459
- Gursoy A, Peker H. Does YouTube provide reliable and high-quality information? Assessment of Pap smear test videos. Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):425-432. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507105
- Stephenson J, Bailey JV, Blandford A, et al. An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24 (56):1-44. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24560
- Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube: pregnancy and COVID-19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150 (2):189-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13246
- Yurdaisik I. Analysis of the most viewed first 50 videos on YouTube about breast cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2750148. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2750148
- Baran C, Yilmaz Baran S. Youtube videos as an information source about urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102197
- Parabhoi L, Sahu RR, Dewey RS, Verma MK, Kumar Seth A, Parabhoi D. YouTube as a source of information during the Covid-19 pandemic: a content analysis of YouTube videos published during January to March 2020. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01613-8
- Rosen NO, Muise MD, Vannier SA, Chambers CT, Scott H; #postbabyhankypanky Advisory Team. #postbabyhankypanky: an empirically based knowledge sharing initiative about sex and the transition to parenthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(1):45-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01734-7
- Salman MY, Bayar G. Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on female urinary incontinence. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(10):102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102200
- Brar J, Khalid A, Ferdous M, Abedin T, Turin TC. Breast cancer screening literacy information on online platforms: a content analysis of YouTube videos. Breast Dis. 2022;41(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-201028
- Flinspach AN, Raimann FJ, Schalk R, et al. Epidural catheterization in obstetrics: a checklist-based video assessment of free available video material. J Clin Med. 2022;11(6):1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061726
- Guloglu S, Ozdemir Y, Basim P, Tolu S. YouTube English videos as a source of information on arm and shoulder exercise after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31 (6):e13685. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13685
- Hong HJ. Development of parent-child cooperative sexuality education program for early adolescents and effectiveness analysis. Korean J Youth Stud. 2022;29(4):357-385. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2022.04.29.4.357
- Husch T, Ober S, Haferkamp A, et al. Comparison of online health information between different digital platforms for pelvic organ prolapse. World J Urol. 2022;40(10):2529-2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04129-6
- Laforet PE, Yalamanchili B, Hillyer GC, Basch CH. YouTube as an information source on BRCA mutations: implications for patients and professionals. J Community Genet. 2022;13 (2):257-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-022-00576-1
- Colla Ruvolo C, Califano G, Tuccillo A, et al. "YouTubeTM as a source of information on placenta accreta: a quality analysis.". Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;272:82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.015
- Tam J, Porter EK, Lee UJ. Examination of information and misinformation about urinary tract infections on TikTok and YouTube. Urology. 2022;168:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.06.030
- Sahin Y, Paslanmaz F, Ulus I, Yilmaz M, Dincer MM, Muslumanoglu AY. Quality and content analysis of female urethroplasty videos on YouTube. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2023;15(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12468
- Ng JY, Munford V, Thakar H. Web-based online resources about adverse interactions or side effects associated with complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review, summarization and quality assessment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01298-5
- Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
- Kim HK. The role of childbirth educators in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2022;28(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.02.25