DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A New Methodology for Software Reliability based on Statistical Modeling

  • Avinash S (Centurion university, Stream of Computer Science and Engineering) ;
  • Y.Srinivas (Centurion university, Stream of Computer Science and Engineering) ;
  • P.Annan naidu (Centurion university, Stream of Computer Science and Engineering)
  • Received : 2023.09.05
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Reliability is one of the computable quality features of the software. To assess the reliability the software reliability growth models(SRGMS) are used at different test times based on statistical learning models. In all situations, Tradational time-based SRGMS may not be enough, and such models cannot recognize errors in small and medium sized applications.Numerous traditional reliability measures are used to test software errors during application development and testing. In the software testing and maintenance phase, however, new errors are taken into consideration in real time in order to decide the reliability estimate. In this article, we suggest using the Weibull model as a computational approach to eradicate the problem of software reliability modeling. In the suggested model, a new distribution model is suggested to improve the reliability estimation method. We compute the model developed and stabilize its efficiency with other popular software reliability growth models from the research publication. Our assessment results show that the proposed Model is worthier to S-shaped Yamada, Generalized Poisson, NHPP.

Keywords

References

  1. P. K. Kapur and R. B. Garg, "A software reliability growth model for an error removal phenomenon," software Engineering Journal, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 291-294, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1049/sej.1992.0030
  2. S. Yamada and S. Osaki, "Software reliability Growth Modeling:Models and Applications," IEEE Transactions on software Engineering, vol. SE-11, no. 12, pp. 1431-1437, 1985.
  3. A. L. Goel and K. Okumoto, "Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures," IEEE Transactions on responsibility, vol. 28, no. 3, pp.206-211 . 
  4. A. L. Goel, "Software responsibility models: assumptions, limitations,and relevancy," IEEE Transactions on software system Engineering, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1411-1423, 1985.
  5. Y.Srinivas,Y.Vamsidhar, "software reliability growth model based on pareto type iii distribution," International Journal of Advanced research in Electrical, electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 6, pp 2694-2698, 2013
  6. R. Subburaj, G. Gopal, and P. K. Kapur, "A software system responsibility growth model for important Quality Metrics," South African Journal of business Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 93-108, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7166/18-2-121
  7. S. Ramasamy and G. Govindasamy, "A software system reliability growth model addressing learning," Journal of Applied Statistics,vol. 35, no. 9-10, pp. 1151-1168, 2008.
  8. R. Subburaj, G. Gopal, and P. K. Kapur, "A software system reliability growth model for estimating debugging and therefore the learning indices," International Jounal of Performability Engineering, vol.8, no. 5, pp. 539-549, 2012.
  9. S. Ramasamy and A. M. J. Muthu Kumaran, "Dynamically weighted combination of fault - based mostly software system Reliability Growth Models," Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol.9, no. 22, Article ID 93967, 2016.
  10. Y. Srinivas, Y.Vamsidhar,"Software responsibility enhancement By using Effective NHPP Models", International Journal of applied science And Technology, vol 4(4), pp 312-314, 2013.
  11. S. Yamada, J. Hishitani, and S. Osaki, "Software-reliability growth with a Weibull test-effort: a model and application,"IEEE Transactions on responsibility, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 100-105, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/24.210278
  12. C.-Y. Huang, S.-Y. Kuo, and M. R. Lyu, "An assessment of testing-effort dependent software system responsibility growth models,"IEEE Transactions on responsibility, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 198-211, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2007.895301
  13. P. K. Kapur, D. N. Goswami, A. Bardhan, andO. Singh, "Flexible software responsibility growth model with testing effort dependent learning method," Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 32, no.7, pp. 1298-1307, 2008.
  14. J. Xu and S. Yao, "Software responsibility growth model with partial equation for numerous debugging processes,"Mathematical issues in Engineering, Article ID2476584,Art.ID 2476584, 13 pages, 2016.
  15. P. Roy, G. S. Mahapatra, P. Rani, S. K. Pandey, and K. N.Dey, "Robust feed forward and continual neural network based dynamic weighted combination models for software system reliability prediction," Applied Soft Computing, vol. 22, pp. 629-637, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.012
  16. Y.-S. Su and C.-Y. Huang, "Neural-network-based approaches for software system responsibility estimation exploitation dynamic weighted combinational models," Journal of Systems and software system, vol. 80,no. 4, pp. 606-615, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.06.017
  17. I. Lakshmanan and S. Ramasamy, "An Artificial Neural-Network Approach to software system responsibility Growth Modeling,"in Proceedings of the third International Conference on Recent Trends in Computing, ICRTC 2015, pp. 695-702, March 2015.
  18. S. Ramasamy and I. Lakshmanan, "Application of artificial neural network for software reliability growth modeling with testing effort," Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9,no. 29, Article ID 90093, 2016.
  19. S. Yamada, "Software Reliability Modeling: Fundamentals and Applications," Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan, 2014.
  20. M. Xie, "Software Reliability Modeling, World Scientific," Singapore Asia, 1991.
  21. A.Wood,"Predicting software reliability," Computer, vol. 29,no.11, pp. 69-77, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.544240
  22. R. Subburaj,"Software Reliability Engineering, McGraw-Hill Professional," New Delhi, India, 2015.
  23. Zainab ALRahamneh, Mohammad Reyalat, Alaa F. Sheta, Sulieman Bani-Ahmad, Saleh Al- Oqeili. "A New Software Reliability Growth Model: Genetic-Programming-Based Approach" , Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 2011
  24. M. Xie and M. Zhao, "On some reliability growth models with simple graphical interpretations," Microelectronics Reliability,vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 149-167, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(93)90477-G