DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Benefit Appeals, Brand Types, and Construal Level on Ad-brand Congruency in Corporate Social Responsibility Messages -Aspirational vs. Accessible Brands

  • Yoo-Won Min (Human-Tech Convergence Program, Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kyu-Hye Lee (Human-Tech Convergence Program, Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.05
  • 심사 : 2023.08.03
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31

초록

Fashion brands seek guidelines for effective green advertising messages, considering benefit appeals, brand types, and construal level. However, few studies have explored their simultaneous interplay. Thus, the present study conducted an experiment with a 2X2X2 between-subjects design to investigate how brand type and construal level moderate the mediating role of ad-brand congruency between benefit appeals and purchase intention. A total of 245 Millennials and Generation Z participants completed an online survey, and the data were analyzed using SPSS. A significant three-way interaction was revealed. Low-construal-level messages with concrete content showed disparities between aspirational and accessible brands concerning other-benefit appeals: Accessible brands utilizing other-benefit appeals demonstrated higher ad-brand congruency, while aspirational brands had lower ad-brand congruency. Furthermore, within aspirational brands, self-benefit appeals resulted in higher ad-brand congruency than other-benefit appeals. Finally, a moderated mediating effect was discovered, indicating that brand types and construal level moderated the mediating effect of ad-brand congruency between benefit appeals and purchase intention. The mediating effect was prominent in the context of self-benefit appeals, aspirational brands, and low-construal-level messages. This study highlights the intricate dynamics of the three factors in green advertising, providing valuable insights for crafting more targeted green advertisements.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Achabou, M. A., & Dekhili, S. (2013). Luxury and sustainable development: Is there a match? Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1896-1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.011 
  2. Adiguzel, F. (2020). Does Advertising appeal type make a difference? A new sustainable fashion product by a luxury and mainstream brand. In S. Muthu, & M. Gardetti (Eds.), Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries (pp. 53-70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38532-3_4 
  3. Aoki, K., Obeng, E., Borders, A. L., & Lester, D. H. (2019). Can brand experience increase customer contribution: How to create effective sustainable touchpoints with customers? Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 29(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2018.1551728 
  4. Arienti, P., Casale, M., Lee, V., Scaramuzzi, V., Sahu, P., Singh, A., Su, L., Trought, F., & Wallace, A. (2019). Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2019: Bridging the gap between the old and the new. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ar/Documents/Consumer_and_Industrial_Products/Global-Powers-of-Luxury-Goods-abril-2019.pdf 
  5. Carmi, N., & Kimhi, S. (2015). Further than the eye can see: Psychological distance and perception of environmental threats. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 21(8), 2239-2257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1046419 
  6. Chanel. (n.d.). Climate report. Retrieved April 12, 2022, from https://www.chanel.com/ae-en/sustainability/ 
  7. Dahlen, M., Lange, F., Sjodin, H., & Torn, F. (2005). Effects of ad-brand incongruence. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2005.10505178 
  8. Darke, P. R., Brady, M. K., Benedicktus, R. L., & Wilson, A. E. (2016). Feeling close from Afar: The role of psychological distance in offsetting distrust in unfamiliar online retailers. Journal of Retailing, 92(3), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.02.001 
  9. Darley, W. K., & Smith, R. E. (1993). Advertising claim objectivity: Antecedents and effects. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700408 
  10. De Barnier, V., Falcy, S., & Valette-Florence, P. (2012). Do consumers perceive three levels of luxury? A comparison of accessible, intermediate and inaccessible luxury brands. Journal of Brand Management, 19(7), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2012.11 
  11. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831 
  12. De Jong, M. D., & van der Meer, M. (2017). How does it fit? Exploring the congruence between organizations and their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2782-2 
  13. Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the right shade of green: The effect of advertising appeal type on environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834805 
  14. Halkias, G., & Kokkinaki, F. (2014). The degree of ad-brand incongruity and the distinction between schema-driven and stimulus-driven attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.891087 
  15. Han, S. L. C., Henninger, C. E., Apeagyei, P., & Tyler, D. (2017). Determining effective sustainable fashion communication strategies. In C. Henninger, P. Alevizou, H. Goworek, & D. Ryding (Eds.), Sustainability in Fashion (pp. 127-150). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51253-2_7 
  16. Hur, W.-M., Kim, M., & Kim, H. (2014). The role of brand trust in male customers' relationship to luxury brands. Psychological Reports, 114(2), 609-624. https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.PR0.114k15w8 
  17. Jaeger, A. K., & Weber, A. (2020). Can you believe it? The effects of benefit type versus construal level on advertisement credibility and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120543 
  18. Janssen, C., Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., & Lefebvre, C. (2014). The Catch-22 of responsible luxury: Effects of luxury product characteristics on consumers' perception of fit with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1621-6 
  19. Jestratijevic, I., Rudd, N. A., & Uanhoro, J. (2020). Transparency of sustainability disclosures among luxury and mass-market fashion brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 11(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2019.1708774 
  20. Kang, E. Y., & Sung, Y. H. (2022). Luxury and sustainability: The role of message appeals and objectivity on luxury brands' green corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(3), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.1874482 
  21. Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S., Cronley, M. L., & Herr, P. M. (2018). Consumer inference. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 165-191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 
  22. Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., & Ko, E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131, 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.021 
  23. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201-1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958 
  24. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70017-7 
  25. Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 3-36). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 
  26. Martin, B. A., Gnoth, J., & Strong, C. (2009). Temporal construal in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380301 
  27. Miller, K. W., & Mills, M. K. (2012). Probing brand luxury: A multiple lens approach. Journal of Brand Management, 20, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.64 
  28. Okonkwo, U. (2016). Luxury fashion branding: Trends, tactics, techniques. Palgrave Macmillan. 
  29. Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048153 
  30. Park, M., Im, H., & Kim, H.-Y. (2020). "You are too friendly!" The negative effects of social media marketing on value perceptions of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 529-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.026 
  31. Peattie, K., & Belz, F.-M. (2010). Sustainability marketing: An innovative conception of marketing. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 27(5), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11621-010-0085-7 
  32. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 
  33. Reczek, R. W., Trudel, R., & White, K. (2018). Focusing on the forest or the trees: How abstract versus concrete construal level predicts responses to eco-friendly products. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.003 
  34. Schorn, A., Vinzenz, F., & Wirth, W. (2022). Promoting sustainability on Instagram: How sponsorship disclosures and benefit appeals affect the credibility of sinnfluencers. Young Consumers, 23(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2021-1355 
  35. Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282004 
  36. Teona, G., Ko, E., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Environmental claims in online video advertising: Effects for fast-fashion and luxury brands. International Journal of Advertising, 39(6), 858-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1644144 
  37. Tih, S., Chan, K. T., Ansary, A., & Ahmed, A. (2016). Green advertising appeal and consumer purchase intention. Journal Pengurusan, 47(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2016-47-13 
  38. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(3), 1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020319 
  39. United Nations. (2019, January 10). UN launches drive to highlight environmental cost of staying fashionable. https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/03/1035161 
  40. Visser, M., Gattol, V., & Helm, R. (2015). Communicating sustainable shoes to mainstream consumers: The impact of advertisement design on buying intention. Sustainability, 7(7), 8420-8436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078420 
  41. Wang, J., Wang, S., Xue, H., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Green image and consumers' word-of-mouth intention in the green hotel industry: The moderating effect of Millennials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.250 
  42. Wei, X., & Jung, S. (2022). Benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy: Implications for the CSR performance of fast fashion brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 31(2), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850 
  43. White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.4.109 
  44. Wong, J. Y., & Dhanesh, G. S. (2017). Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the luxury industry: Managing CSR-luxury paradox online through acceptance strategies of coexistence and convergence. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916669602 
  45. Yang, D., Lu, Y., Zhu, W., & Su, C. (2015). Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2663-2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.004 
  46. Youn, S. Y., & Cho, E. (2022). CSR ads matter to luxury fashion brands: A construal level approach to understand Gen Z consumers' eWOM on social media. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(3), 516-533. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2020-0269