Wind and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Updates of Korean Design Standard (KDS) on the wind load assessment and performance-based wind design

  • Han Sol Lee (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seung Yong Jeong (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Thomas H.-K. Kang (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering & Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2022.10.01
  • Accepted : 2023.07.05
  • Published : 2023.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korea Design Standard (KDS) will be updated with two major revisions on the assessment of wind load and performance-based wind design (PBWD). Major changes on the wind load assessment are the wind load factor and basic wind speed. Wind load factor in KDS is reduced from 1.3 to 1, and mean recurrence interval (MRI) for basic wind speed increases from 100 years to 500 years considering the reduction of wind load factor. Additional modification is made including pressure coefficient, torsional moment coefficient and spectrum, and aeroelastic instability. Combined effect of the updates of KDS code on the assessment of wind load is discussed with the case study on the specified sites and building. PBWD is newly added in KDS code to consider the cases with various target performance, vortex-induced vibration, aeroelastic instability, or inelastic behavior. Proposed methods and target performance for PBWD in KDS code are introduced.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) grant funded by the Korean government (MTIE) (No. 20020795)

References

  1. AIJ (2004), AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (AIJ 2004), Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Tokyo, Japan.
  2. AIJ (2015), AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (AIJ 2015), Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Tokyo, Japan.
  3. AIK (2021), Nonlinear Analysis Modeling for Performance-Based Seismic Design of RC Building Structures, Architectural Institute of Korea (AIK), Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  4. Alinejad, H., Jeong, S.Y. and Kang, T.H.-K. (2020), "Performance-based design of tall buildings for wind load and application of response modification factor", Wind Struct., 31(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.31.2.153.
  5. Alinejad, H., Kang, T.H.-K. and Jeong, S.Y. (2021), "Performance-based wind design framework proposal for tall buildings", Wind Struct., 32(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2021.32.4.283.
  6. Alinejad, H., Jeong, S.Y., Chang, C. and Kang, T.H.-K. (2022), "Upper limit of aerodynamic forces for inelastic wind design", J. Struct. Eng., 148(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003260.
  7. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  8. ASCE (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE 41-17), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  9. ASCE (2019), Prestandard for Performance-Based Wind Design, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  10. ASCE (2022), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-22), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.
  11. Bezabeh, M., Bitsuamlak, G.T. and Tesfamariam, S. (2019), "The first step towards the performance-based design of wind-excited buildings: A critical examination of ductility-demand, hysteretic energy, and control of damage accumulation", Proceedings, The 15th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Beijing, China.
  12. Ciampoli, M., Petrini, F. and Augusti, G. (2011), "Performance-based wind engineering: Towards a general procedure", Struct. Safety, 33(6), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.07.001.
  13. Davenport, A.G. (1967), "Gust loading factors", J. Struct. Eng., 93(3), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001692.
  14. El Damatty, A.A. and Elezaby, F.Y. (2018), "The integration of wind and structural engineering", Proceedings, The 2018 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, & Materials Research (ACEM18), Incheon, Korea.
  15. Ellingwood, B. and Tekie, P.B. (1997), "Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design", J. Struct. Eng., 125(4), 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(453).
  16. FEMA (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (FEMA 440), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC.
  17. Griffis, L.G. (1993), "Serviceability limit states under wind load", Eng. J., 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v30i1.606
  18. Ha, Y.-C. (2018), "Proposal of return period and basic wind speed map to estimate wind loads for strength design in Korea", J. Architect. Institute Korea Struct. Construct., 34(2), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2018.34.2.29
  19. Ha, Y.-C. (2021), Wind Resistant Design on Buildings. Goomibook, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)
  20. Huang, M.F., Li, Q., Chan, C.M., Lou, W.J., Kwok, K.C.S and Li, G. (2015), "Performance-based design optimization of tall concrete framed structures subject to wind excitations", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 139, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.005.
  21. ISO (2007), Bases for Design of Structures - Serviceability of Buildings and Walkways against Vibrations (ISO 10137:2007), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland.
  22. Jeong, S.Y., Kim, M.K. and Kang, T.H.-K. (2021), "Case study and research on performance-based wind design of RC tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Institute Korea, 25(3), 1-10. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.37109/weik.2021.25.3.119
  23. Kang, T.H.-K., Jeong, S.Y. and Alinejad, H. (2019), "Comparative study on standards of along-wind loads for the design of high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Institute of Korea, 23(3), 135-142. (in Korean)
  24. Katagiri, J., Ohkuma, T. and Marukawa, H. (2002), "Prediction formula of critical wind speed of torsional aerodynamic unstable vibration", AIJ J. Technol. Des., 15, 65-70. (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.3130/aijt.8.65
  25. Katsumura, A., Kawai, H., Terazaki, H., Tamura, Y. and Fugo, Y. (2014), "Modeling of wind-induced torsional moment on tall buildings", Proceedings of 23rd National Symposium on Wind Engineering, 421-426. (in Japanese)
  26. Nakai, M., Hirakawa, K., Yamanaka, M., Okuda, H. and Konishi, A. (2013), "Performance-based wind-resistant design for high-rise structures in Japan", Int. J. High-Rise Build., 2(3), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2013.2.3.271
  27. National Research Council Canada (2010), User's Guide-NBC 2010 Structural Commentaries (Part 4 of Division B) (NBC 2010).
  28. Ngo, T. and Letchford, C. (2008), "A comparison of topographic effects on wind speed", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96(12), 2273-2293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.01.002.
  29. Nishimura, H. and Taniike, Y. (1996), "Aeroelastic instabilities of high-rise buildings in a turbulent boundary layer", J. Construct. Eng., AIJ, 482, 27-32. (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.61.27_3
  30. PEER/ATC (2010), Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings (PEER/ATC 72-1), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER)/Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, CA.
  31. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (Korea) (2016), Korean Building Code (KBC 2016), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  32. Ravindra, M.K., Cornell, C.A. and Galambos, T.V. (1978), "Wind and snow load Factors for use in LRFD", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(9), 1443-1457. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004987.
  33. Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis, G. (1991), "Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation", Appl. Mech. Rev., 44(4), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501.
  34. Tamura, Y., Kawai, H., Uematsu, Y., Marukawa, H., Fujii, K. and Taniike, Y. (1996), "Wind load and wind-induced response estimations in the recommendations for loads on buildings, AIJ 1993", Eng. Struct., 18(6), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00121-2.
  35. TBI (2017), Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings (TBI 2017), Tall Buildings Initiative (TBI), Berkeley, CA.
  36. WEIK (2010), Wind-Resistant Engineering for Engineers, The Wind Engineering Institute of Korea (WEIK), Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  37. Zhou, Y., Kijewski, T. and Kareem, A. (2002), "Along-wind load effects on tall buildings: Comparative study of major international codes and standards", J. Struct. Eng., 128(6), 788-796. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(788).