References
- Buzug TM. Computed tomography: Springer; 2011.
- Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. European journal of radiology. 2003;45:S4-S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00358-3
- Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, Chiba Y, Haga K, Saito H, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004;182(1):201-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820201
- Kim KP, Gil JW, Lee BY, Lee HG. Evaluation of national medical radiation dose. Weekly Health and Illness. 2021;14(23):1614-32.
- Lee SG. Current status and policy options for high-tech medical devices in Korea: vertical and horizontal synchronization of health policy. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2012;55(10):950-8. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.950
- Lee KH. https://www.newspim.com/news/view/20220928000043, accessed on Jun. 08, 2023.
- Choi MR. http://www.healthfocus.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=90442, accessed on Jun. 08, 2023.
- Yu SJ, Seok JM, Won HS, Jo JH, Hwang DG, Seo SY. Investigation of radiation exposure dose of human body in computed tomography. Proceedings of the Korean Magnestics Society Conference. 2015:70-1.
- MEDICAL SERVICE ACT Article 38.
- Enforcement Regulations of installation and operation of special medical equipment.
- Noh SS, Um HS, Kim HC. Development of Automatized Quantitative Analysis Method in CT Images Evaluation using AAPM Phantom. Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers. 2014;51(12):163-73. https://doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2014.51.12.163
- Lee KB, Cho YB, Jeong HK, Nam KC, Kim HC. The Study on Automatized Quantitative Assessment Method of CT Image in Quality Control: Focusing on Spatial and Low Contrast Resolution. Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers. 2017;54(12):186-94. https://doi.org/10.5573/ieie.2017.54.12.186
- Im YJ, Hwang HS, Kim DH, Kim HC. A Study on the Quantitative Evaluation Method of Quality Control using Ultrasound Phantom in Ultrasound Imaging System based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research. 2022;43(6):390-8. https://doi.org/10.9718/JBER.2022.43.6.390
- Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017:4700-8.
- Tan M, Le Q. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International conference on machine learning. 2019:6105-14.
- Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi A. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. 2017;31(1).
- He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016:770-8.
- Chollet F. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017:1251-8.
- Feurer M, Hutter F. Hyperparameter optimization. Automated machine learning: Methods, systems, challenges. 2019:3-33.
- Ruby U, Yendapalli V. Binary cross entropy with deep learning technique for image classification. Int J Adv Trends Comput Sci Eng. 2020;9(10).
- Marreiros AC, Daunizeau J, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ. Population dynamics: variance and the sigmoid activation function. Neuroimage. 2008;42(1):147-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.239
- Liang J. Confusion Matrix: Machine Learning. POGIL Activity Clearinghouse. 2022;3(4).
- Chida K, Kaga Y, Haga Y, Takeda K, Zuguchi M. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems. Health physics. 2013;104(1):97-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3182659c72
- Vennart W. ICRU Report 54: Medical imaging-the assessment of image quality-ISBN 0-913394-53-X. April 1996, Maryland, USA. Radiography. 1997;3(3):243-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-8174(97)90038-9
- Lee KB, Nam KC, Jang JS, Kim HC. Feasibility of the Quantitative Assessment Method for CT Quality Control in Phantom Image Evaluation. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(8):3570.