Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Detailed Nondisclosure Criteria for the Administrative Departments

행정각부 비공개 대상정보 세부기준 개선방안 연구

  • 김유승 (중앙대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.07.20
  • Accepted : 2023.07.31
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss problems and seek improvement plans based on a critical analysis of the detailed standards for nondisclosure of 19 administrative departments in accordance with Article 26 of the Government Organization Act. To this end, the status of information disclosure-related regulations in 19 administrative departments was analyzed, and 6,094 cases of nondisclosed information were investigated and analyzed. In addition, through interviews with seven information disclosure experts, the analysis contents of this study were shared and reviewed. Furthermore, opinions on the effectiveness, problems, and system improvement areas of the detailed standards for nondisclosed information were collected. As a conclusion, three improvement measures were proposed: first, the legislation on the establishment of detailed standards for nondisclosure; second, the establishment of a system for regular substantive inspection of detailed standards for nondisclosure; and third, the improvement in the service of detailed standards for nondisclosure.

본 연구는 「정부조직법」 제26조에 따른 19개 행정각부의 비공개 대상정보 세부기준에 대한 비판적 분석을 바탕으로 문제점을 정리하고 개선방안을 모색하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 19개 행정각부의 정보공개 관련 규정, 지침, 훈령의 제·개정 현황을 분석하고, 비공개 대상정보 6,094건에 대한 전수조사 및 분석을 수행하였다. 또한, 정보공개심의회와 정보공개 행정소송 경험을 가진 정보공개 전문가 5인과 정보공개 업무를 담당한 바 있는 기록연구사 2인을 포함한 전문가 7인과의 면담을 통해, 본 연구의 조사 및 분석 내용을 공유, 검토하고, 비공개 대상정보 세부기준의 실효성, 문제점, 제도개선 영역의 의견을 수렴하였다. 결론에 갈음하여, 첫째, '비공개 대상정보 세부기준 수립 주체와 절차의 법제화', 둘째, '비공개 대상정보 세부기준의 정기적 실질적 점검 수행을 위한 제도 수립', 셋째, '비공개 대상정보 세부기준 서비스 개선' 등 3가지 개선방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hwang, Jin-hyun, Lim, Jimin, Byeon, Wooyeon & Yim, Jin-hee (2021). Strategies for the Development of "Detailed Nondisclosure Standards" for Public Institutions. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(1), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.1.117
  2. Jeong, Ha Myoung (2010). The proper subject information of disclosure request in Freedom of Information Act in Korea. Law Review, 51(1), 49-70.
  3. Jung, Zin-Im (2023, May 24). 4 names that disappeared in 9 months... The absurd presidential secretary's office. Available: https://www.opengirok.or.kr/5124
  4. Kang, Hyun Ho (2015). Current trends of the supreme court decisions regarding disclosure of administrative informations of public institutions. SungKyunKwan Law Review, 27(1), 91-133. https://doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2015.27.1.004
  5. Kim, Jo-eun (2023 May 23). The Ministry of Employment and Labor, who hides the name of the company in the middle of the major disaster, who does it work for?. Available: https://www.opengirok.or.kr/5123
  6. Kim, Youseung (2022). A Study on Detailed Nondisclosure Criteria for the National Assembly: Focused on National Assembly Information Disclosure Regulations. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(3), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.3.037
  7. Korean Law Information Center (2006). Reasons for enactment and amendment of the Information Disclosure Act of public institutions. Available: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsRvsRsnListP.do?lsId=001357&chrClsCd=010202&lsRvsGubun=all
  8. Kyoung, Keon (2013). Information of Non-Disclosure on the Official Information Disclosure Act: the Meaning and Scope of Personal Information. Studies on Public Administration Cases, 18(2), 41-85.
  9. Lee, Cheolwhan (2008). Methods of Disclosure of Information on Expense Accounts: A Case Review on 2001Du6425 (Sup. Ct., March 11, 2003). Chonnam Law Review, 28(2), 363-383.
  10. Lee, Ilse (2015). A Case Study on the Official Information Disclosure - focused on the reasons of non-disclosure. Kangwon Law Review, 45, 145-210. https://doi.org/10.18215/kwlr.2015.45..145
  11. Lee, Je-Hee (2020). Legal discussion for the expansion of information disclosure by public institutions. Korean Lawyers Association Journal, 69(4), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.17007/klaj.2020.69.4.001
  12. Lee, Min-Yeong (2011). Object-Conformity to Non-Disclosure of So-Called 'Trial Information'. Juris, 1(17), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.22825/juris.2011.1.17.001
  13. Lee, Soon-Ok (2020). A Study on the Scope of 'Personal Information to Non-Disclosure' of Case Records of Non-prosecution. Chung-Ang Journal of Legal Studies, 44(3), 131-173. https://doi.org/10.22853/caujls.2020.44.3.131
  14. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2019). Disclosure of the results of the '2019 Comprehensive Information Disclosure Evaluation'. Available: https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=72707
  15. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2021a). Ministry of Public Administration and Secur ity, 2019, 2020 Information Disclosure Comprehensive Evaluation Results Disclosure. Available: https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=82328
  16. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2021b). Who is the best institution in the comprehensive evaluation of information disclosure this year?. Available: https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=89576
  17. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2022a). 2022 Information Disclosure Annual Report. Available: https://www.open.go.kr/infOthbc/dta/dtaDta.do
  18. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2022b). Ministry of Public Administration and Security, Disclosure of 2022 Information Disclosure Comprehensive Evaluation Results. Available: https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=97261
  19. Park, Jung-Seok (2023, July 14). The prosecution's response in the process of administrative litigation and the problems of the prosecution's special activity expenses that have been revealed so far. Emergency Debate Report: What should be done to find out the truth about the misuse and illegal disposal of the prosecution's special activity funds?.
  20. Park, Kyung Sin (2015). Constitutional review of "Other Laws and Regulations" Exception to FOIA Obligations. Journal of Legislation Research, 49, 7-38.