Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Green Remodeling Decision-Making Considering Dynamic Interactions of Passive and Active Retrofit Variables

패시브 및 액티브 요소 기술의 동적 교호 작용을 고려한 그린 리모델링 의사 결정

  • Heo, Seon-Young (Dept. of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ra, Seon-Jung (Dept. of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kin, Young-Sub (Dept. of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chu, Han-Gyeong (Dept. of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Cheol-Soo (Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering.Institute of Engineering Research.Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 허선영 (서울대 건축학과 ) ;
  • 라선중 (서울대 건축학과 ) ;
  • 김영섭 (서울대 건축학과 ) ;
  • 추한경 (서울대 건축학과 ) ;
  • 박철수 (서울대 건축학과.공학연구원.건설환경종합연구소)
  • Received : 2023.05.10
  • Accepted : 2023.08.04
  • Published : 2023.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the urgency of global warming, the building sector is trying to curtail building energy for sustainable development. The current building codes relies on a prescriptive approach that specifies thermal properties of building components such as wall U-value, window U-value, fenestration SHGC, heat pump COP, lighting density. However, this prescriptive falls short because it does not consider the holistic energy performance of a building as well as sometimes results in biased or wrong decision making. To overcome this, we selected a target building (US DOE small office building), conducted global sensitivity analysis and analyzed interwoven interactions between retrofit variables and building energy use through the SHAP method, one of the explainable AIs. Conclusively, it was found that if the interwoven interactions were not properly taken into account, the prescriptive approach could lead to a wrong decision making. In addition, it emphasized that the performance based thinking must be employed in building energy decision making.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 산업통상자원부(MOTIE)와 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 지원을 받아 수행한 연구 과제입니다. (No. 20202020800360)

References

  1. ASHRAE, (2017). ASHRAE Handbook: Fundamentals 2017, ASHRAE 
  2. Augenbroe, G., & Park, C. S. (2005). Quantification methods of technical building performance. Building Research & Information, 33(2), 159-172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000325327
  3. Chu, H. G., Shin, H. S., Cho, S. K., Yoo, Y. S., & Park, C. S. (2022). Sensitivity analysis using explainable AI for building energy use. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(11), 279-287.  https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2022.38.11.279
  4. Foliente, G. (2000). Developments in performance-based building codes and standards. Forest Products Journal, 50(7/8), 12. 
  5. Heo, Y., Choudhary, R., & Augenbroe, G. A. (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 47, 550-560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.029
  6. KOREA Energy Agency (KEA) (2022). Building Energy Efficiency Certification. 
  7. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. 
  8. Koo, S. Y., & Song, S. Y. (2016). The analysis of relationship of thermal performance between the whole window and thermal bridging area. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 32(10), 87-94.  https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.10.87
  9. Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety (KALIS) (2023). Public building green remodeling guideline, 117-191. 
  10. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. 
  11. Li, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2021). Optimizing energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building green retrofit. Energy, 237, 121509. 
  12. Li, X., & Wen, J. (2014). Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 517-537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.056
  13. NEN, N. (1999). 2916: energy performance of non-residential buildings determination method. Delft: Dutch Normalization Institute (NEN), Standardization Institute. 
  14. Park C. S. (2006). Normative assessment of technical building performance. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 22(11), 337-344. 
  15. Persily, A. (1989). Ventilation rates in office buildings. 
  16. Ra, S. J., Chu, H. G., Kim, Y. S., Kim, S. S., & Park, C. S. (2023). Stochastic analysis of heat pump operation under varying use scenarios in commercial building. ASHRAE Transactions, 129. 
  17. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. John Wiley & Sons. 
  18. Tian, W., de Wilde, P., Li, Z., Song, J., & Yin, B. (2018). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of energy assessment for office buildings based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Energy Conversion and Management, 174, 705-718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.086
  19. UK Department for Communities and Local Government (UK DCLG) (2023). UK's national calculation method for non domestic buildings, Retrieved July 11, 2023 from http://www.uk-ncm.org.uk/. 
  20. U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) (2010). Reference Buildings by Building Type: Small office. Retrieved September. 27, 2010. from https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/reference-buildings-building-type-small-office-0 
  21. Yoo, Y. S., Yi, D. H., & Park, C. S. (2021). Uncertainty in sensitivity analysis of architectural design variables for heating and cooling loads depending on usage scenarios. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(11), 247-253.  https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.11.247
  22. 2050 Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth Commission (2021). 2050 Carbon Neutrality Scenarios. Retrieved Jun. 16, 2022 from https://2050cnc.go.kr/eng/contents/view?contentsNo=42&menuLevel=2&menuNo=49#