Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Basic Study on 'Ruralism' Perception through Expert Group: Focusing on Delphi and AHP Analysis

전문가집단을 통해 본 '농촌다움' 인식에 관한 기초연구: 델파이와 AHP분석을 중심으로

  • 도지윤 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 서기춘 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 정명철 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 최진아 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2023.08.11
  • Accepted : 2023.08.18
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of the basic direction for the new regulations and categories of Ruralism changing in the new era. To this end, the results of Delphi analysis and AHP analysis by dividing it into the definition, criteria, scope and component items of Ruralism based on systematic literature review are as follows. First, through studies representing most rural areas, it was found that Ruralism was the most problematic keyword and most of the studies did not cover it as they were studying various ranges of rural areas. Second, the Delphi survey was able to derive keywords that can be used as evidence for item classification and clear concept establishment for the regulation and category setting of Ruralism. Third, through the hierarchical decision-making method, it was found that landscape factors are the most important thing in forming Ruralism as well as deriving priorities that can be a baseline for each item. This study is meaningful in providing a minimum baseline as basic data for establishing the concept of Ruralism, and it is believed that future-oriented Ruralism can be established if reviews are added from various perspectives to overcome limitations dependent on expert groups.

본 연구는 새로운 시대에 변화하는 농촌다움의 새로운 규정과 범주를 위한 기초적 방향을 목적으로 수행되었다. 체계적 문헌고찰을 토대로 농촌다움의 정의, 기준, 범위, 구성요소 항목으로 구분하여 델파이 분석과 AHP분석을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대부분의 농촌을 표상하는 연구를 통해 농촌다움이 가장 이슈가 된 키워드임을 파악할 수 있었으며, 농촌의 다양한 범위를 각각 연구하고 있어 이를 포괄하지 못하는 연구가 대다수임을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 델파이 조사를 통하여 농촌다움의 규정 및 범주 설정을 위한 항목분류와 명확한 개념 정립을 위한 근거자료로 활용될 수 있는 키워드를 도출할 수 있었다. 셋째, 계층적 의사결정법을 통하여 항목별 기준선이 될 수 있는 우선순위 도출뿐만 아니라 경관적인 요인이 농촌다움을 형성하는 가장 중요한 것임을 파악할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 농촌다움 개념 정립을 위한 기초자료로 최소한의 기준선을 제공한 것에 의의가 있으며, 전문가 집단에 의존한 한계점을 극복하기 위하여 다양한 관점에서의 검토가 추가된다면 미래지향적인 농촌다움을 설정할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국립농업과학원 농업과학기술 연구개발사업(RS-2022-RD009984)에 의해 이루어진 것임.

References

  1. Ahn TM, Son JD, Kim MS. 2005. Rurality and Preferences of Rural Landscapes in Korea - A Comparison of Evaluations by Koreans and Foreigners -. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 11(3): 43-52. 
  2. An JS. 2011. Developing evaluation criteria for historic gardens preservation condition by applying delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process. a doctoral dissertation. Sungkyunkwan University. 
  3. Brian O, Kim SB, Campbell H, Stuckeman ER. 2011. A Study on the Approaches for Assessing and Managing Rural Amenity Resources Value - Focus on Elements of Value Assessment in Rural Amenity -. Journal of Recreation and Landscape 5(1): 11-21. 
  4. Cho GT, Cho YG, Kang HS. 2003. The analytic hierarchy process. Seoul: Donghyun.
  5. Choi SM. 2002. A village selling rusticness and nostalgia. Bulletin of Agricultural Technology 39(7): 14-18. 
  6. Jinyang MS, Kim JY. 2014. An Analysis on the Discourses of Rurality in Urban to Rural Migration. The Journal of Rural Society 24(2): 123-160. 
  7. Kim OH, Jung SB. 2022. Factor Extraction of Ethical Management and Analysis of Relative Importance of Public Sports Organizations: Appling Delphi Technique and AHP. Korean Journal of Convergence Science 11(4): 18-32.  https://doi.org/10.24826/KSCS.11.4.2
  8. Kwon TI. 2008. Study on Drawing Priority of the Influence Factors of Tourist Resort Remodeling Business: Delphi Technic & Analytic Hierarchy Process. Department of Hospitality & Tourism Management The Graduate School of Sejong University. 
  9. Lee JH, Kim CH. 2020. Keyword Feasibility Analysis for Social Big Data Analysis - Focusing on the Ministry of Education's Key Tasks in 2020 -. KERIS Issue Report 13: 1-26. 
  10. Lee JS. 2001. Method of Study 21: Method of Delphi. Seoul: Kyoyookbook. 
  11. Lee SM. 2019. The Evolvement of Discourse and the Establishment of Conceptional System on Rurality and Ruralness. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 25(4): 129-149.  https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2019.25.4.129
  12. Lim HB. 2012. The Directions of Revitalizing Rural Economy using Rural Amenities. The Korea Local Administration Review 26(3): 3-25. 
  13. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2003. Rural Tourism, www.maf.go.kr/03_policy/03_0402.asp 
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2003. The government of the people. www.maf.go.kr/01_intro/01_0505.asp 
  15. Park DS. 2001. Research methodology in education. Seoul: Moonumsa. 
  16. Park SH, Lee DG, Yun SH. 2002. Meanings and Measurement Scale Development on Rurality. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Tourism 9(1): 22-37. 
  17. Park YJ, Park WZ. 2011. Plan for construction of Songcheon-ri Farm Area Amenity. Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 15(4): 71-79.  https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2011.15.4.008
  18. Son YH, Kim YJ. 2019. The Image of Ruralism in Korea through a Text Mining for Online News Media analysis. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 25(4): 13-26.  https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2019.25.4.013
  19. Song SH, Kwon SH, Park JB, Hong SK. 2008. A Study on AHP Methodology Using Delphi. Korean Industrial Engineering Society. Journal of Autumn Academic Presentation, 1-8. 
  20. Yi DY, Son YH. 2021. A Study on the Concept of Korean Ruralism - Focusing on the Comparison of Research on Ruralism and Rurality in Korea -. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 27(3): 69-84. 
  21. Yoo EJ. 2020. Research on competency factor development & Priority evaluation of Airline cabin crew - Delphi & AHP applied -. Kyunghee University Graduate School Department of Tourism. 
  22. www.riss.kr 
  23. www.scholar.google.co.kr