Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korean government (project number: KMDF_PR_20200901_0299).
References
- Clementini M, Morlupi A, Canullo L, Agrestini C, Barlattani A. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;41:847-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.016
- Shamsoddin E, Houshmand B, Golabgiran M. Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2019;10:46-50. https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_327_18
- Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Ratnayake J. Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: a review of current trends and developments. Molecules 2021;26:3007.
- Yamada M, Egusa H. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62:152-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.010
- Jepsen S, Schwarz F, Cordaro L, Derks J, Hammerle CH, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, et al. Regeneration of alveolar ridge defects. Consensus report of group 4 of the 15th European Workshop on Periodontology on Bone Regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:277-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13121
- Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F, Perale G. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:92-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13058
- Carson JS, Bostrom MP. Synthetic bone scaffolds and fracture repair. Injury 2007;38 Suppl 1:S33-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.008
- Peres MF, Ribeiro ED, Casarin RC, Ruiz KG, Junior FH, Sallum EA, et al. Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate and enamel matrix derivative for treatment of proximal class II furcation defects: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:252-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12054
- Fukuba S, Okada M, Nohara K, Iwata T. Alloplastic bone substitutes for periodontal and bone regeneration in dentistry: current status and prospects. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:1096.
- Daculsi G, Laboux O, Malard O, Weiss P. Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:195-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022842404495
- LeGeros RZ, Lin S, Rohanizadeh R, Mijares D, LeGeros JP. Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics: preparation, properties and applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:201-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022872421333
- Lee JT, Lee Y, Lee D, Choi Y, Park J, Kim S. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and clinical efficacy of biphasic calcium phosphate-added collagen membrane in ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2020;50:238-50. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2001080054
- Tumedei M, Savadori P, Del Fabbro M. Synthetic blocks for bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:4221.
- Dahlin C, Obrecht M, Dard M, Donos N. Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:814-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12361
- Morris K. Revising the Declaration of Helsinki. Lancet 2013;381:1889-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60951-4
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010;1:100-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72352
- Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, Pagliaro U, Raffaelli E, Nieri M. Comparing membranes and bone substitutes in a one-stage procedure for horizontal bone augmentation. A double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2015;8:271-81.
- Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, Pagliaro U, Raffaelli E, Nieri M. Comparing membranes and bone substitutes in a one-stage procedure for horizontal bone augmentation. Three-year post-loading results of a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2018;11:441-52.
- Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080206.x
- Orsini G, Scarano A, Degidi M, Caputi S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of bone around Bio-Oss particles in sinus augmentation. Oral Dis 2007;13:586-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01343.x
- Lan Levengood SK, Polak SJ, Wheeler MB, Maki AJ, Clark SG, Jamison RD, et al. Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2010;31:3552-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.052
- Rh Owen G, Dard M, Larjava H. Hydoxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate biphasic ceramics as regenerative material for the repair of complex bone defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2018;106:2493-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34049
- Yuan H, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, de Bruijn JD. Cross-species comparison of ectopic bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1607-15. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1607
- Tanaka K, Botticelli D, Canullo L, Baba S, Xavier SP. New bone ingrowth into β-TCP/HA graft activated with argon plasma: a histomorphometric study on sinus lifting in rabbits. Int J Implant Dent 2020;6:36.
- Habibovic P, Kruyt MC, Juhl MV, Clyens S, Martinetti R, Dolcini L, et al. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes. J Orthop Res 2008;26:1363-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20648
- Garrido CA, Lobo SE, Turibio FM, Legeros RZ. Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics for orthopaedic reconstructions: clinical outcomes. Int J Biomater 2011;2011:129727.
- Dorozhkin SV. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials 2010;31:1465-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050
- Bouler JM, Pilet P, Gauthier O, Verron E. Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction: a review of biological response. Acta Biomater 2017;53:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.076
- Jung EH, Jeong SN, Lee JH. Augmentation stability and early wound healing outcomes of guided bone regeneration in peri-implant dehiscence defects with L- and I-shaped soft block bone substitutes: a clinical and radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32:1308-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13830
- Lee JH, Jung EH, Jeong SN. Augmentation stability of guided bone regeneration for peri-implant dehiscence defects with l-shaped porcine-derived block bone substitute. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:6580.
- Arunjaroensuk S, Panmekiate S, Pimkhaokham A. The stability of augmented bone between two different membranes used for guided bone regeneration simultaneous with dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:206-16. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5492
- Lee JH, Jung EH, Jeong SN. Profilometric, volumetric, and esthetic analysis of guided bone regeneration with L-shaped collagenated bone substitute and connective tissue graft in the maxillary esthetic zone: a case series with 1-year observational study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2022;24:655-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13116
- Naenni N, Schneider D, Jung RE, Husler J, Hammerle CH, Thoma DS. Randomized clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri-implant bone defects: clinical and histological outcomes at 6 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1309-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12977
- Jung RE, Fenner N, Hammerle CH, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1065-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02522.x
- Lutz R, Neukam FW, Simion M, Schmitt CM. Long-term outcomes of bone augmentation on soft and hard-tissue stability: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26 Suppl 11:103-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12635