한국간호교육학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education)

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.302-318
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-9578(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7814(eISSN)
한국간호교육학회 (The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 간호사의 조직침묵 관련 요인: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석

Factors related to the organizational silence of Korean nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Received : 2023.03.31
  • Accepted : 2023.05.04
  • Published : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the variables related to the organizational silence of Korean hospital nurses and to examine the effect sizes of correlations between the related variables and sub-types of organizational silence. Methods: Relevant studies were searched through a systematic search in six Korean electronic databases (RISS, ScienceON, KCI, DBpia, e-Article, and KISS) using June 2022 as the end date. Thirteen studies were identified through a systematic review and eight of them were meta-analyzed. The correlation effect size r (ESr) for each related variable was calculated. Results: Twenty-two related variables were identified from the systematic review. Of them, organizational culture was the most frequently examined. Seven variables (three organizational, two leader-member exchange, and two consequences of organizational silence) were found eligible for the meta-analysis. The intention of turnover (ESr=.39; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI=.32 to .45) and leader-member exchange ("manager's leaderships" ESr=-.33, 95% CI= -.43 to -.21; "manager's inclination to reject negative feedback" ESr=.32, 95% CI=.23 to .39) had larger correlation effect sizes than the other variables that related to organizational silence, in particular, acquiescent silence, which had the largest correlation effect size among the three sub-types of organizational silence. Conclusion: These findings show that the intention of turnover and leader-member exchanges were the main factors that related to the organizational silence. This indicates that it is necessary to develop management and education programs, as well as communication systems that focus on reducing and managing organizational silence, especially acquiescent silence.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang J, Yang H, Wang B. Organizational silence among hospital nurses in China: A cross-sectional study. BioMed Research International. 2022;2022:9138644. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9138644
  2. Eriguc G, Ozer O, Turac IS, Songur C. Organizational silence among nurses: A study of structural equation modeling. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology. 2014;4(1):150-162.
  3. Eriguc G, Ozer O, Turac IS, Songur C. The causes and effects of the organizational silence: On which issues the nurses remain silent? International Journal of Management Economics and Business. 2014;10(22):131-153.
  4. Jang GS, Lee MH, Lee TW, Kim JS, Kang KW, Kim MY, et al. Nursing management. 5th ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2022. p. 279-280.
  5. Yi KH, You MS. Nurses' organizational silence in hospitals: A grounded theoretical approach. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing. 2022;31(2):66-76. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2022.31.2.66
  6. Dyne LV, Ang S, Botero IC. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies. 2003;40(6):1359-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
  7. Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review. 2000;25(4):706-725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
  8. Kang JS, Go DY. Definition of Korean Organizational Silence and verification of the survey tool. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review. 2014;13(1):141-159.
  9. Milliken FJ, Morrison EW, Hewlin PF. An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies. 2003; 40(6):1453-1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
  10. Go DY, Cho JH. A meta-analysis on the consequences of organizational silence. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies. 2020;20(3):131-155. https://doi.org/10.46330/jkps.2020.09.20.3.131
  11. Go DY, Kang JS, Kim KK. A study on the effects of public organizational silence on turnover intention: Moderated mediating effect of self-efficacy through organizational cynicism. Korean Public Administration Review. 2015;49(1): 1-28.
  12. Jung MG, Sohn TY, Choe H. The effect of organizational culture and organizational silence on turnover intention of members of a small and medium-sized hospital in the metropolitan area. Korean Journal of Hospital Management. 2021;26(2):43-55.
  13. Go DY. A meta-analysis on the causes of organizational silence. Korean Local Administration Review. 2021;18(2): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.32427/klar.2021.18.2.1
  14. Jia Z. A study on the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational silence [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sejong University; 2012. p. 1-92.
  15. Kim HM, Kwon HJ, Kim YS. The effects of hotel organizational culture on organizational silence: Moderating effect of organization-based self-esteem. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism. 2019;28(1):205-224. https://doi.org/10.24992/KJHT.2019.01.28.01.205.
  16. Kilinc E, Ulusoy H. Investigation of organizational citizenship behavior, organizational silence and employee performance at physicians and nurses, and the relationship among them. Business Management Dynamics. 2014;3(11):25-34.
  17. Go DY, Kim YG, Kang JS. The influence of organizational culture on turnover intention in Korea coast guard: Validation of pro-social silence's mediator effect. The Journal of Police Science. 2015;15(1):215-244. https://doi.org/10.22816/polsci.2015.15.1.008
  18. Go DY, Kang JS, Kim KK. A study on the impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behaviour: The mediating effect of organizational silence. The Korean Journal of Public Administration. 2015;24(1):223-261. https://doi.org/10.22897/kipajn.2015.24.1.008
  19. Go DY, Kang JS. Conceptualization and development of measurement tools for the silence phenomenon in Korean administrative culture: Focus on adaptive silence. Korean Public Administration Review. 2017;51(4):29-55. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.51.4.29
  20. Chung SJ. Development of the hospital nurses' silence behavior scale [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2021. p. 1-132.
  21. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022) [Internet]. London: Cochrane; 2022 [cited 2022 June 28]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
  22. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  23. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Critical appraisal tools for use in JBI systematic review: Checklist for analytic cross sectional studies [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI The University of Adelaide; 2020 [cited 2022 July 27]. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
  24. Park SH, Lee TW. Factors influencing Korean nurses' intention to stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2018;24(2):139-148. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2018.24.2.139
  25. Yu KH, Park HY, Jang KS. Factors related to self-leadership of Korean clinical nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2018;24(5):410-422. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2018.24.5.410
  26. Hwang SD. Meta-analysis using R. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2020. p. 1-382.
  27. Lee SC, Lim WS, Kim YC. A meta-analysis of the relationship between school organizational culture and organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Educational Administration. 2016;34(2):171-196.
  28. Lee GH, Kim SJ, Yu HJ. Parental factors associated with smartphone overuse in preschoolers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2020;50(3):349-368. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.19186
  29. Cho YJ, Jeong SH, Kim HS, Kim YM. Effects of leadership styles of nursing managers on turnover intention of hospital nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2022;52(5):479-498. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.22039
  30. Littell JH, Corcoran J, Pillai V. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Jeong IS, Jun SS, Hwang SK, Kim DH, Ha JY, translator. Paju: Soomoonsa; 2011. p. 1-220.
  31. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988. p. 79-82.
  32. Kim EK, Park HO. Factors associated with burden of family caregivers of home-dwelling elderly people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2019;31(4):351-364. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2019.31.4.351
  33. Go DY. The effects of public organizational culture on organizational silence: Focusing on the Korean coast guard [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2014. p. 1-135.
  34. Kim MJ, Kim MH. An analysis of research trends related with organization silence. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 2016;7(5):189-200. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.5.189
  35. Go DY. The effects of emotional leadership perception on organizational silence: Focusing on the mediating effect of authoritarianism. Korean Local Administration Review. 2019;16(3):1-18.
  36. Park KO, Park SH, Yu M. Review of research on nursing organizational culture in Korea. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(2):387-395. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.02.387
  37. Chung HJ, Ahn SH. Relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction among Korean nurses: A meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2019;25(3):157-166. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2019.25.3.157