DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Buckling resistance, torque, and force generation during retreatment with D-RaCe, HyFlex Remover, and Mtwo retreatment files

  • Yoojin Kim (Gwangjin Ye Dental Clinic) ;
  • Seok Woo Chang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Soram Oh (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2022.09.14
  • Accepted : 2022.10.25
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the buckling resistance of 3 nickel-titanium (NiTi) retreatment file systems and the torque/force generated during retreatment. Materials and Methods: The buckling resistance was compared among the D-RaCe (DR2), HyFlex Remover, and Mtwo R25/05 retreatment systems. J-shaped canals within resin blocks were prepared with ProTaper NEXT X3 and obturated by the single-cone technique with AH Plus. After 4 weeks, 4 mm of gutta-percha in the coronal aspect was removed with Gates-Glidden drills. Retreatment was then performed using DR1 (size 30, 10% taper) followed by DR2 (size 25, 4% taper), HyFlex Remover (size 30, 7% taper), or Mtrwo R25/05 (size 25, 5% taper) (15 specimens in each group). Further apical preparation was performed with WaveOne Gold Primary. The clockwise torque and upward force generated during retreatment were recorded. After retreatment, resin blocks were examined using stereomicroscopy, and the percentage of residual filling material in the canal area was calculated. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey test. Results: The HyFlex Remover files exhibited the greatest buckling resistance (p < 0.05), followed by the Mtwo R25/05. The HyFlex Remover and Mtwo R25/05 files generated the highest maximum clockwise torque and upward force, respectively (p < 0.05). The DR1 and DR2 files generated the least upward force and torque (p < 0.05). The percentage of residual filling material after retreatment was not significantly different between file systems (p > 0.05). Conclusions: NiTi retreatment instruments with higher buckling resistance generated greater clockwise torque and upward force.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Republic of Korea (NRF-2021R1G1A1006751).

References

  1. Karamifar K, Mehrasa N, Pardis P, Saghiri MA. Cleanliness of canal walls following gutta-percha removal with hand files, RaCe and RaCe plus XP-Endo Finisher instruments: a photographic in vitro analysis. Iran Endod J 2017;12:242-247.
  2. Topcuoglu HS, Akti A, Tuncay O, Dincer AN, Duzgun S, Topcuoglu G. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. J Endod 2014;40:2066-2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.004
  3. Beer FP, Johnston ER, DeWolf JT. Mechanics of materials (in SI units). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2004. 
  4. Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33:297-310. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x
  5. Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schafer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys - a review. Int Endod J 2018;51:1088-1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12924
  6. Rodig T, Hausdorfer T, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hulsmann M. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012;45:580-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02014.x
  7. Garg A, Nagpal A, Shetty S, Kumar S, Singh KK, Garg A. Comparison of time required by D-RaCe, R-Endo and Mtwo instruments for retreatment: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC47-ZC49. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11100.5596
  8. Staffoli S, Grande NM, Plotino G, Ozyurek T, Gundogar M, Fortunato L, Polimeni A. Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel-titanium rotary instrument. Odontology 2019;107:301-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0399-5
  9. Kwak SW, Shen Y, Liu H, Kim HC, Haapasalo M. Torque generation of the endodontic instruments: a narrative review. Materials (Basel) 2022;15:664.
  10. Ha JH, Cheung GS, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Kwak SW, Kim HC. 'Screw-in' tendency of rotary nickel-titanium files due to design geometry. Int Endod J 2015;48:666-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12363
  11. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.215
  12. Yilmaz A, Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Gur C, Ersev H, Kiziltas Sendur G, Avcu E, Baydemir C, Abbott PV. Evaluation of dentin defect formation during retreatment with hand and rotary instruments: a micro-CT study. Scanning 2017;2017:4868603.
  13. Htun PH, Ebihara A, Maki K, Kimura S, Nishijo M, Tokita D, Okiji T. Comparison of torque, force generation and canal shaping ability between manual and nickel-titanium glide path instruments in rotary and optimum glide path motion. Odontology 2020;108:188-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00455-1
  14. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr, Soares RG, Souza LC, Oliveira JC, Lopes WS, Mangelli M. Mechanical behavior of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 2012;38:1417-1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.005
  15. FKG Dentaire: D-Race. Available from: https://www.fkg.ch/products/endodontics/retreatment/d-race (updated June 1, 2010; cited November 1, 2021). 
  16. Coltene: HyFlex Remover. Available from: https://japan.coltene.com/products/endodontics/retreatment-files/retreatment-files//hyflex-remover/ (updated October 1, 2019; cited November 1, 2021). 
  17. VDW: VDW dental Mtwo user brochure. Available from: https://www.vdw-dental.com/fileadmin/Dokumente/Sortiment/Aufbereitung/Rotierende-Aufbereitung/Mtwo/VDW-Dental-Mtwo-User-Brochure-EN.pdf (updated December 20, 2015; cited November 1, 2021). 
  18. Fukumori Y, Nishijyo M, Tokita D, Miyara K, Ebihara A, Okiji T. Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of differently tapered nickeltitanium endodontic rotary instruments. Dent Mater J 2018;37:667-674. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-312
  19. Kwak SW, Ha JH, Cheung GS, Kim SK, Kim HC. Comparison of in vitro torque generation during instrumentation with adaptive versus continuous movement. J Endod 2019;45:803-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.010
  20. Lopes WS, Vieira VT, Silva EJ, Silva MC, Alves FR, Lopes HP, Pires FR. Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments. Int Endod J 2020;53:1689-1695. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13385
  21. Oh S, Jeon BK, Chang SW. Mechanical properties and torque/force generation of XP-Endo Shaper, Trunatomy, Spring Endo File, and Spring Endo heated finish file, part 1. Appl Sci 2022;12:10393.
  22. Hulsmann M, Drebenstedt S, Holscher C. Shaping and filling root canals during root canal re-treatment. Endod Topics 2008;19:74-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2011.00264.x
  23. Piazza B, Rivera-Pena ME, Alcalde MP, de Vasconcelos BC, Duarte MA, de Moraes IG, Vivan RR. The Influence of humidity on intra-tubular penetration and bond strength of AH Plus and MTA Fillapex: an in vitro study. Eur Endod J 2017;3:48-54. https://doi.org/10.5152/eej.2017.17036
  24. Wiesse PE, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, Estrela C, Domingues LM, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2018;51:102-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12794