Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development and Validation of Three Systems of Action Scale in Home Economics for Middle and High School Students

중⋅고등학생용 가정교과 세 행동체계 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구

  • Choi, Seong Youn (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Chonnam National University)
  • 최성연 (전남대학교)
  • Received : 2023.08.14
  • Accepted : 2023.09.18
  • Published : 2023.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale that can grasp the reality of the three systems of action for middle and high school students in home economics. For this purpose, a total of 105 questions, 35 questions for each systems of action, were developed as a 5-point Likert scale in order to measure technical action, communicative action, and emancipative action as preliminary questions by reviewing domestic and international literature related to the three systems of action. The procedure for revising and supplementing the developed preliminary questions by reviewing the content validity of the home economics education expert was executed twice. A preliminary survey was conducted on middle and high school students with 70 developed preliminary questions, and 166 copies were collected. As a result of exploratory factor analysis of the collected questionnaires to test the validity of the scale, it was found that 38 questions 7 factors were appropriate. After constructing this survey based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, this survey was conducted on middle and high school students, and 548 copies were collected and a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. A total of 38 questions were finally selected through confirmatory factor analysis, including basic living ability 5 questions, self-management ability 4 questions, information processing ability 4 questions, communication/interpersonal ability 12 questions, critical thinking ability 3 questions, decision-making ability 7 questions, empowerment 3 questions. The Model Fit was χ2=1846.741(p<.001), CFI=0.865, TLI=0.853, RMSEA=0.058, and the Standardized Regression Weights for each question was more than 0.5, so it can be seen as a suitable measurement instrument for measuring the status of the three systems of action of middle and high school students in home economics. The three systems of action scales were found to have significant correlations with self-acceptance, future planning, intimacy, uniqueness, which are sub-factors of the self-identity scale, and social participation scales therefore confirmed that they have recognized concurrent validity.

본 연구는 가정교과에서 중·고등학생을 위한 세 행동체계의 실태를 파악할 수 있는 척도를 개발하고 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해서 세 행동체계와 관련된 국내외 문헌을 고찰하여 예비문항으로 기술적 행동, 의사소통적 행동, 해방적 행동을 측정할 수 있도록 각 행동체계별로 35개 문항, 총 105개 문항을 5점 리커트 척도로 개발하였다. 개발된 예비문항을 가정교육학 전문가에게 내용타당도를 검토받아 수정·보완하는 절차를 두 차례 실행하였다. 개발된 예비문항 70개를 중·고등학생을 대상으로 예비조사를 실시하여 166부를 회수하였다. 척도의 타당성을 검정하기 위해 회수된 설문지를 탐색적 요인 분석한 결과 7요인 38개 문항이 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과를 바탕으로 본 조사 문항을 구성한 후 중·고등학생을 대상으로 본조사를 실시하여 548부를 회수하여 확인적 요인분석을 하였다. 확인적 요인분석을 통해 기초생활능력 5문항, 자기관리능력 4문항, 정보처리능력 4문항, 의사소통·대인관계능력 12문항, 비판적사고력 3문항, 의사결정능력 7문항, 임파워먼트 3문항 총 38문항이 최종 선정되었다. 이 모형의 적합도는 χ2=1846.741(p<.001), CFI=0.865, TLI=0.853, RMSEA=0.058로 나타났고, 각 문항별 표준화 계수는 0.5 이상으로 나타났으므로 가정교과에서 중·고등학생의 세 행동체계의 실태를 측정하는데 적합한 측정 도구로 볼 수 있다. 세 행동체계 척도는 자아정체감 척도의 하위요인인 자기수용성, 미래계획성, 친밀성, 독특성과 사회참여척도와 유의한 상관을 갖는 것으로 나타나 공인타당도를 갖는 것으로 확인되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 전남대학교 학술연구비(과제번호: 2022-2537) 지원을 받아 작성되었음.

References

  1. Brown, M. M. (1980). What is home economics education? Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education.
  2. Brown, M. M. (1985). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States, Vols. I and II: Our practical-intellectual heritage. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  3. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  4. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). Instruction to home economics education. Paju: Gyomoonsa.
  5. Cho, S. J., & Kim, H. J. (2018). Development and validation of healthcare ability scale of middle and high school students. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 20(4), 103-115. http://doi.org/10.21797/ksme.2018.20.4.008
  6. Choi, S. H., & Choi, H. Y. (2014). Understanding of adolescents' emotion regulation: Development and validation of a measurement tool. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 33(4), 833-852. UCI: G704-001037.2014.33.4.008
  7. Choi, S. Y. (2020). Evaluation of dietary life instruction in middle school home economics by converging habermas's three systems of action. Family and Environment Research, 58(4), 561-583. http://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2020.038
  8. Choi, S. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2020a). A comparative study on Korean and American high school home economics textbooks based on habermas's three systems of action: Focusing on the learning objectives and activities. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.19031.jkheea.2020.03.32.1.107 https://doi.org/10.19031.jkheea.2020.03.32.1.107
  9. Choi, S. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2020b). Development of dietary life curriculum in elementary and secondary schools home economics that integrated Habermas's three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(2), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.19031.jkheea.2020.06.32.2.117 https://doi.org/10.19031.jkheea.2020.06.32.2.117
  10. Chung, O. B., Lim, J. H., Chung, S. H., Kim, L. J., & Yoon, J. E. (2012). The development and validation of a self-directed learning inventory for middle and high school students. The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 19(2), 227-249.
  11. Chung, S. W., Jeong J. C., & H, S. (2012). A study on the development of the measuring scale of legal consciousness for youths. Korean Social Studies Association, 19(3), 49-63. UCI: I410-ECN-0102-2023-300-001187369
  12. Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  13. Gong, M. J. (2019). Comparative analysis of life competencies between the normal and concerned group of middle school students in emotional and behavioral. Unpublished master's thesis, Dong-Eui university, Busan, Korea.
  14. Habermas, J. (1987). Erkenntnis und interesse [Knowledge and human interests]. (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). USA, MA: Polity Press. (Original work published 1968).
  15. Ju, S., & Yoo, T. (2016a). Core-concepts and three systems of action based home economics curriculum design. The Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(2), 123-141. UCI: G704-SER000000664.2016.22.2.015
  16. Ju, S., & Yoo, T. (2016b). Development of content structure focusing on three systems of action for the 2009 revised current home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 28(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2016.06.28.2.1
  17. Kang, H. C. (2013). Discussions on the suitable interpretation of model fit indices and the strategies to fit model in structural equation modeling. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 15(2), 653-668.
  18. Kim, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, D. (2014). Development and validation of team connectedness scale in physical education class. Korean Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 21(2), 103-120.
  19. Kim, J. H. (2016). The effect of agreement-oriented controversial issues instruction on sense of community. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  20. Kim, J. Y. (2013). The effect of middle school students' perceived relationship with their fathers on social problem solving, career exploration, and career decision making. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  21. Kim, W. S. (2015). Reading Habermas. Seoul: Sechang Publish.
  22. Kwon, M. K. (2019). The effects of career exploration program on the career development competencies of middle school students in free learning year. Unpublished master's thesis, Gongju National University of education, Chung Nam, Korea.
  23. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  24. Lee, D. Y. (2019). Influence of students with little cultural experience in museum and gallery on the aesthetic sensibility. Unpublished master's thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon, Korea.
  25. Lee, E. C., & Kim, M. J. (2010). Developing a scale of spirituality for Korean adolescent. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 18(3), 243-263. UCI: G704-001282.2010.18.3.003
  26. Lee, E. H. (2014). The effect of the empathy based school violence prevention program on empathy ability and aggression of middle school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Transportation, Chung Buk, Korea.
  27. Lee, G. W., Jeon, J. C., Heo, G. C., Hong, W. P., & Kim, M. S. (2009). A study on the design plan of elementary and secondary school curriculum for promoting the core competency of Korean in the future (RRC 2009-10-1). Chung Buk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  28. Lee, H. J. (2014). The effect of using portfolio-based lessons on the development of self-identity of female middle school students and its two-year follow up: Focusing on the 'understanding adolescents' unit in middle school technology & home economics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chung Buk, Korea.
  29. Lee, H. J., & Cho, J. S. (2005). Importance of objectives of housing unit in home economics by three systems of action of home economics teachers in middle school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(4), 117-131.
  30. Lee, K. W., Jeon, J. C., Heo, K. C., Hong, W. P., & Kim, M. S. (2009). A study on the design plan of elementary and secondary school curriculum for promoting the core competency of Korean in the future (Research report RRC 2009-10-1). KICE.
  31. Lee, M. H., & Jung, T. Y. (2007). Development and validation of the learning motivation scale. Studies on Korean Youth, 18(3), 295-321. UCI: G704-001385.2007.18.3.013
  32. Lee, S. J., & Yu, N. S. (2017). Development of instrument for measuring home economics-pedagogical content knowledge (H-PCK). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 29(1), 35-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2017.03.29.1.35
  33. Lee, Y. S. (2002). The relationships between identity and job interest amongst middle school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  34. McGregor, S. L. T. (2020). Engaging home economics through new philosophical idea: A commentary on international contributions. International Journal of Home Economics, 13(1), 43-71.
  35. Ministry of Education (2015). Practical arts(technology & home economics) /informatics subject curriculum (Ministry of education notice No. 2015-74). Sejong: Author.
  36. Nam, H. S. (2017). Development and validation of the perceived youth empowerment scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyunggi University, Gyeonggi, Korea.
  37. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Sciences (2008). National standards for family and consumer sciences reasoning for action standards and process questions. https://www.leadfcsed.org/uploads/1/8/3/9/18396981/process_framework_overview.pdf
  38. Oh, H., & Kim, S. (2012). Development and validation of the youth academic resilience scale. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 9(1), 47-63.
  39. Oh, K., & Lee, S. H. (2021). Application of home economics teaching-learning plan in the clothing for teenager's empowerment. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 33(1), 169-184.
  40. Oh, Y. H., & Chae, J. H. (2005). Middle school home economics teachers' family value and needs on learning objectives of family life area according to the three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(2), 239-255.
  41. Park, M. J. (2008). Development of empowerment scale instrument and needs assessment of home economics teachers' empowerment. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(3), 131-143.
  42. Park, Y. M. (2019). The effects of personality discussion class using picture-books on social-emotional competences and critical thinking ability of elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu, Korea.
  43. Ryu, H. R., Chong, Y. S., & Chae, J. H. (1997). A study needs perception toward educational purposes of home economics subject in middle schools, Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 6(1), 111-127.
  44. Saleebey, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work. London: Longman Publishing Group.
  45. Seo, J. W., & Lee, Y. J. (2016). An instructional model for the improvement of decision making skills in the 'technical innovation and invention' unit of technology & home economics curriculum. Journal Institute of Industrial Educators, 41(1), 108-127.
  46. Shim, E. K. (2011). Comparative study of life competencies between general youths and youth committee members of regional youth center. Unpublished master's thesis, Dong-Eui University, Busan, Korea.
  47. Shin, H., & Yum, S. (2015). Development and validation of the Korean school engatement scale for middle school students. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 12(2), 177-202.
  48. Shin, M. K. (2017). The effect of middle school students' communicative ability and self-esteem on internalizing and externalizing behaviors. Unpublished master's thesis, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Staaland, E., & Strom, S. (1996). Family, food, and society: A teacher's guide. WI: Wisconsin State Dept. of Public Instruction, Madison.
  50. Yang, J. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2018). The ideal portrait of human being pursuing in home economics education based on key competence and key concept. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research, 24(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2018.24.1.035.
  51. Yoo, N. S., & Kim, Y. N. (1997). Teachers' needs assessment on food/nutrition of secondary home economics education for three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 9(1), 83-94.
  52. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2011). Practical problem based home economics class: Theory and practice. Seoul: Book Korea.
  53. Yoo, T. M., Yang, J. S., Ju, S., & Yu, N. S. (2019). Achievements of the Korean home economics education association throughout its 30 year history and future vision and mission of home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(4), 163-192. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.12.31.4.163