Korean Journal of Environmental Biology (환경생물)

Korean Society of Environmental Biology (한국환경생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of soil arthropod community characteristics in organic and conventional orchards in Gangwon Province

강원지역 유기 및 관행 과수원에서의 절지동물 군집 특성 비교

  • June Wee (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Yong Ho Lee (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Sun Hee Hong (School of Applied Science in Natural Resources & Environment, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kijong Cho (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Young Ju Oh (Institute for Future Environmental Ecology Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Chae Sun Na (Seed Conservation Research Division, Baekdudewgan National Arboretum) ;
  • Kwang Lai Park (Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA)
  • 위준 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스연구원) ;
  • 이용호 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스연구원) ;
  • 홍선희 (한경국립대학교 식물자원조경학부) ;
  • 조기종 (고려대학교 환경생태공학과) ;
  • 오영주 ((주)미래환경생태연구소) ;
  • 나채선 (국립백두대간수목원 야생식물종자연구실) ;
  • 박광래 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부)
  • Received : 2023.12.01
  • Accepted : 2023.12.22
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study conducted an investigation into the effects of fruit type and cultivation practices (organic and conventional) on soil characteristics and soil arthropod communities within apple, blueberry, grape, peach, and pear orchards. The collection of soil arthropod communities was achieved through the utilization of pitfall traps, with concurrent measurements taken for soil moisture content, electrical conductivity, and temperature. The findings of this study unveiled substantial impacts attributed to fruit type and cultivation practices on soil characteristics. Specifically, within organic apple orchards, discernibly higher levels of soil moisture content, electrical conductivity, and temperature were observed when compared to their conventional counterparts. The investigation into soil arthropod communities yielded a total of 1,527 individuals, classified in to five phyla and 15 orders. The range of abundance, species richness, and diversity indices varied across conventional and organic orchards. Cultivation practices were found not to exert a significant influence on soil arthropod community characteristics. However, Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis indicated a significant differentiation in soil arthropod community structure based on cultivation practices. This study underscores the importance of considering vegetation structure and environmental characteristics that may influence soil arthropod communities comprehensively when assessing the impact of cultivation practices on soil arthropods. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need to account for both the characteristics and structure of soil arthropod communities in understanding the implications of cultivation practices on these organisms.

본 연구는 사과, 블루베리, 포도, 복숭아, 배 과수원에서 과수의 종류와 재배 방식(유기 및 관행)이 토양 특성 및 토양 절지동물 군집에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 함정트랩을 사용하여 토양 절지동물 군집을 조사하였으며, 조사 당시의 토양 수분 함량, 전기전도도, 온도가 조사되었다. 결과적으로, 과수의 종류와 재배 방식은 토양 특성에 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 특히, 유기 사과 과수원에서는 관행 사과 과수원에 비해 높은 토양 수분 함량, 전기전도도, 온도가 관측되었다. 토양 절지동물 군집에 대한 조사를 통해서 5강 15목에 속하는 1,527 개체가 채집되었다. 개체수, 종 풍부도, 다양성 지수의 범위는 관행 및 유기 과수원에서 각각 9~93 ind. trap-1, 4.00~17.00, 1.09~1.84 및 27~48 ind. trap-1, 9.50~14.00, 1.33~2.14였다. 재배 방식은 토양절지동물 군집 특성에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 하지만 NMDS (Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling) 분석결과, 재배 방식에 따라 토양 절지동물 군집 구조가 유의하게 다를 수 있음을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 재배 방식이 토양 절지동물에 미치는 영향을 파악하는데 있어, 토양 절지동물 군집에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 식생 군집 및 환경 특성이 종합적으로 고려되어야 하며, 토양 절지동물 군집의 특성뿐만 아니라 구조도 고려되어야 함을 시사한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구성과는 농촌진흥청(과제번호: PJ016062032023)의 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Ahn CH, YJ Oh, SM Ock, WJ Lee, SI Sohn, MH Kim, YE Na and CS Kim. 2017. The comparison of community characteristics of ground-dwelling invertebrates according agroecosystem types in the Eastern region of the Korean Peninsula. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 56:29-39. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2016.11.0.056
  2. Anderson MJ. 2014. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley StatsRef, Statistics Reference Online. UK. pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841
  3. Atkinson D. 2000. Root Characteristics: Why and What to Measure. Root Methods. Springer. Berlin, Germany. pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_1
  4. Bang JH, IC Shin, YM Lee, DG Lee, MJ Park, S Lee, HJ Yoon, SG Park, YI Kuk and SJ Hong. 2023. Characteristics of benthic macroinvertebrate community and distribution of golden apple snail in certified environmentally-friendly paddy field complexes of South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 41:126-137. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2023.41.2.126
  5. Bardgett RD and DA Wardle. 2010. Aboveground-Belowground Linkages: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Processes, and Global Change. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.
  6. Brady NC and RR Weil. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 14th ed. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
  7. Burke JA, KL Lewis, GL Ritchie, PB DeLaune, JW Keeling, V Acosta-Martinez, JM Moore and T McLendon. 2021. Net positive soil water content following cover crops with no tillage in irrigated semi-arid cotton production. Soil Tillage Res. 208:104869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104869
  8. Guedes RNC, G Smagghe, JD Stark and N Desneux. 2016. Pesticide-induced stress in arthropod pests for optimized integrated pest management programs. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 61:43-62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023646
  9. IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Brondizio ES, J Settele, S Diaz and HT Ngo, eds.). IPBES secretariat. Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
  10. Kim DI, SG Kim, SJ Ko, BR Kang, DS Choi, GH Lim and SS Kim. 2011. Biodiversity of invertebrate on organic and conventional pear orchards. Korean J. Org. Agric. 19:93-107.
  11. Kim H, KJ Kim, Y Sun, YJ Jo, TY Kim and MJ Moon. 2018. Change in biodiversity and community structures in agricultural fields depending on different farming methods. Korean J. Org. Agric. 26:687-706. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.4.687
  12. Kim MH, HK Nam, J Eo and YJ Song. 2019. Floristic features of orchards in South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 37: 447-466. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.4.447
  13. Korean Entomological Institute. 1998. Insects Life in Korea, 1st ed.. Korean Entomological Institute, Korea University. Seoul, Korea.
  14. KREI. 2019. The Current Status and Future Challenges of Organic Agricultural Production and Consumption in 2019, both Domestic and International. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Naju, Korea.
  15. Ma T, X Deng, L Chen and W Xiang. 2020. The soil properties and their effects on plant diversity in different degrees of rocky desertification. Sci. Total Environ. 736:139667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139667
  16. Mitchell MG, EM Bennett and A Gonzalez. 2014. Agricultural landscape structure affects arthropod diversity and arthropod-derived ecosystem services. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 192:144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.015
  17. Ponisio LC, LK M'Gonigle, KC Mace, J Palomino, P Valpine and C Kremen. 2015. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 282:20141396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1396
  18. Pulleman M, R Creamer, U Hamer, J Helder, C Pelosi, G Peres and M Rutgers. 2012. Soil biodiversity, biological indicators and soil ecosystem services - an overview of European approaches. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4:529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.009
  19. Raven PH and DL Wagner. 2021. Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118:e2002548117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.20025481
  20. Reese AT, A Savage, E Youngsteadt, KL McGuire, A Koling, O Watkins, SD Frank and RR Dunn. 2016. Urban stress is associated with variation in microbial species composition - but not richness - in Manhattan. ISME J. 10:751-760. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.152
  21. Russell MC, J Lambrinos, E Records and G Ellen. 2017. Seasonal shifts in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) species and functional composition maintain prey consumption in Western Oregon agricultural landscapes. Biol. Control 106:54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.12.008
  22. Sonoda S, Y Izumi, Y Kohara, Y Koshiyama and H Yoshida. 2011. Effects of pesticide practices on insect biodiversity in peach orchards. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 46:335-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-011-0041-2
  23. The Entomological Society of Korea. 1994. Name Enumeration of Korean Insect, 1st ed.. Konkuk University Press. Seoul, Korea.
  24. van der Putten WH, RD Bardgett, JD Bever, TM Bezemer, BB Casper, T Fukami, P Kardol, JN Klironomos, A Kulmatiski, JA Schweitzer, KN Suding, TFJ van de Voorde and DA Wardle. 2013. Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J. Ecol. 101:265-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12054
  25. Wardle DA, KS Nicholson, KI Bonner and GW Yeates. 1999. Effects of agricultural intensification on soil-associated arthropod population dynamics, community structure, diversity and temporal variability over a seven-year period. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31:1691-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00089-9
  26. Zabala JA, JM Martinez-Paz and F Alcon. 2021. A comprehensive approach for agroecosystem services and disservices valuation. Sci. Total Environ. 768:144859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859