방사선산업학회지 (Journal of Radiation Industry)

한국방사선산업학회 (Korean Society of Radiation Industry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the Suitability of Nuclear Sharing Strategy of South Korea through the Nuclear Strategy of U.S. NPR

  • Dong-Kwon Cho (Department of Military Science, Dong-gang University) ;
  • Sin-Young Yu (Department of Radiological Technology, Dong-gang University) ;
  • Sung-Gil Kim (Department of Radiology, Gwangju Health University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.30
  • 심사 : 2023.12.08
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The subject of this research is what is the most effective strategy of the nuclear sharing strategy of South Korea through the nuclear strategy that the U.S. is pursuing now. The U.S. Nuclear Strategy-related change can be found in a Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) report released by the U.S. The first NPR was announced in 1994 and after that, the U.S. has additionally announced a total of four NPRs along with administration changes. The change in the U.S. nuclear strategy and nuclear power are considered both deterrence and offset strategies. It can be summarized in two ways. First, by maintaining overwhelming nuclear power against the enemy, the U.S. is to lead nuclear advantage that is the core of the U.S. nuclear strategy. Second, the U.S. is to limit the competition of nuclear power with nations seeking to challenge the U.S. nuclear power advantage. Additionally, the U.S. is to actively sign an agreement with nations on the reduction and restriction of nuclear weapons. Through the NPR of the U.S., South Korea should know its unclear power and strategy and have an effective nuclear strategy of South Korea. Therefore, this research is to deal with the suitability of the nuclear sharing strategy with the U.S., which is one of the various nuclear strategies of South Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nayan R. 2023. American Nuclear Posture in the Changing Strategic Environment. Strateg. Anal. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2247769. 
  2. Yost DS. 2004. The US Nuclear Posture Review and the NATO allies. Int. Aff. 80(4):705-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00412.x.
  3. Sagan SD and Vaynman J. 2011. Arms, Disarmament & influence; International Responses to the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review. The Nonproliferation Review. 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2011.549169. 
  4. Peczeli A. 2018. The Trump Administration's Nuclear Posture Review; Back to Great Power Competition. J. Peace Nucl. Disarm. 1(18):238-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2018.1530741. 
  5. Zeb R. 2023. Biden Administration's Nuclear Posture Review and American Nuclear Policy; A Critical Overview. Margalla Papers 27(1):53-66. https://doi.org/10.54690/margallapapers.27.1.151. 
  6. Kristensen HM and Norris RS. 2017. A History of US Nuclear Weapons in South Korea. Bull. At. Sci. 73:349-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1388656. 
  7. Mount A. 2023. The US and South Korea: The Trouble with Nuclear Assurance. Survival 65(2):123-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2193104. 
  8. Park H-r. 2021. North Korea's Nuclear Armament Strategy and Deception. Def. Stud. 23(1):126-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2103407. 
  9. Kristensen HM, Korda M, Johns E and Knight M. 2023. Nuclear weapons sharing, 2023. Bull. At. Sci. 79(6):393-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2266944. 
  10. Saqib A and Ali S. 2023. Nuclear Deterrence and National Security in the Twenty-First Century. CISS Insight Journal. 22-37. http://www.journal.ciss.org.pk/index.php/ciss-insight/article/view/246.