방사선산업학회지 (Journal of Radiation Industry)

한국방사선산업학회 (Korean Society of Radiation Industry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PET-MRI에 대한 최적의 정보 제공에 대한 연구: 문헌 보고 중심으로

A Study on the Optimal Information Provision for PET-MRI: Focused on Literature Article

  • 손동섭 (청주대학교 보건의료과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 구은회 (청주대학교 보건의료과학대학 방사선학과)
  • DongSeob Son (Department of Radiological Science, Cheongju University) ;
  • EunHoe Goo (Department of Radiological Science, Cheongju University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.01
  • 심사 : 2023.12.06
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Currently, state-of-the-art devices such as SPECT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI are rapidly spreading nationwide, and the penetration rate of nuclear medical devices is also ranked fifth in the world. However, PET/MRI's system is slower and less common because it is more complex than PET/CT. The purpose of this study is to provide optimal information on PET/MRI according to the patient's disease. The subjects obtained information on head and neck cancer, pediatric patients, breast cancer patients, heart disease patients, lung cancer patients, and rectal cancer patients. We tried to accumulate protocols by obtaining a lot of information about each disease. In diagnosing head and neck cancer, it is believed that it is highly likely to be used in evaluating preoperative stage determination, recurrence and remote metastasis after treatment, and unclear primary cervical lymph node metastasis. Diagnosis and continuous follow-up of pediatric patients can increase patient benefits by minimizing radiation exposure. Breast cancer provides a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical need to determine the extent of disease in breast and local lymph nodes and the systematic stages of early diagnosis or recurrence. In diagnosing heart disease patients, MR-based PET motion correction helps to realize the full potential of PET images. For lung cancer patients, the clinical value and usefulness of the resolution and detection ability of integrated PET/MRI for soft tissues such as lung cancer will be sufficient. In diagnosing rectal cancer patients, the detection of missing residual diseases can change the clinical response evaluation for rectal cancer patients treated with TNT, and both the initial stage and treatment response evaluation are possible. Therefore, this literature study provided basic clinical data for PET/MRI tests.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams S, Baum RP, Stuckensen T, Bitter K and Hor G. 1998. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25(9):1255-1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050293.
  2. Loeffelbein DJ, Souvatzoglou M, Wankerl V, Martinez-Moller A, Dinges J, Schwaiger M and Ambros JB. 2012. PET-MRI fusion in head and neck oncology: current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 70(2):473-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.120.
  3. Castelijns JA. 2011. PET-MRI in the head and neck area: challenges and new directions. Eur. Radiol. 21(11):2425-2426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2181-8.
  4. Kim Jl, Jeon JH, Kim IS, Lee HJ and Kim JE. 2013. Comparison of SUV for PET/MRI and PET/CT. KJMNT 17(2):10-14.
  5. Kim KM, Lee BW, Lee DW, Kim JS, Jang YD, Chan SB, Baek JH and Lee IS. 2010. One-stop Evaluation Protocol of Ischemic Heart Disease: Myocardial Fusion PET Study. KJMNT 14(2):33-37.
  6. Ra YS. 2003. Clinical Application of SPECT and PET in Cerebro-Vascular Disease. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 34(1):1-12.
  7. Park CS and Ju MS. 2019. Introduction to Nuclear Medicine (PET/MRI): J. Korean Magn. 29(5):184-195. https://doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2019.29.5.184.
  8. Laubenbacher C, Saumweber D, Wagner-Manslau C, Kau RJ, Herz M, Avril N, Ziegler S, Kruschke C, Arnold W and Schwaiger M. 1995. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET, MRI and endoscopy for staging head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas. J. Nucl. Med. 36(10):1747-1757.
  9. Braams JW, Pruim J, Freling NJ, Nikkels PG, Roodenburg JL, Boering G, Vaalburg W and Vermey A. 1995. Detection of lymph node metastases of squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck with FDG-PET and MRI. J. Nucl. Med. 36(2):211-216.
  10. Platzek I, Beuthien-Baumann B, Schneider M, Gudziol V, Langner J, Schramm G, Laniado M, Kotzerke J and van den Hoff J. 2013. PET/MRI in head and neck cancer: initial experience. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 40(1):6-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2248-z.
  11. Stephen MB, Ajit HG, Bradley JK and Geoffrey BJ. 2018. Clinical PET/MRI: 2018 Update: Review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 211(2):295-313. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20001.
  12. Schramm G, Langner J, Hofheinz F, Petr J, Beuthien-Baumann B, Platzek I, Steinbach J, Kotzerke Jorg and van den Hoff J. 2013. Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction. MAGMA 26(1):115-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-012-0328-5.
  13. Kraus R, Delso G and Ziegler SI. 2012. Simulation Study of Tissue-Specific Positron Range Correction for the New Biograph mMR Whole-Body PET/MR System. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59(5):1900-1909. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2012.2207436.
  14. Feng J, Sebastian L, Kelvin JL, Stefan K, Huijun Y and Maxim Z. 2017. Design of a shielded coil element of a matrix gradient coil. J. Magn. Reson. 281:217-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.06.006.
  15. Lee JH, Ko SJ and Kim JH. 2016. TLD's Glow Curve and Radiation Exposure Amount Analysis at Environment with/without Magnetic Field Exposure as Time Passing. Jour. of KoCon.a 16(8):419-426. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.419.
  16. Claudio S, Herrmann K and Czernin J. 2016. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients. J. Nucl. Med. 57(3):420-430. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.158808.
  17. Gerard SK. 2021. PET/MRI Versus PET/CT for Whole-Body Staging. J. Nucl. Med. 62(4):591. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261917.
  18. Mannheim JG, Schmid AM, Schwenck J, Katiyar P, Herfert K, Pichler BJ and Disselhorst JA. 2018. PET/MRI Hybrid Systems. Semin. Nucl. Med. 48(4):332-347. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.02.011.