DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiation Exposure Dose of Handlers Using 18F-FDG in Small Animal Image Acquisition Experiments

  • Ik Soo Kim (Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Sun Young Yoon (Department of Radiology, Nambu University) ;
  • Hwa Yeon Yeo (Department of Radiology, Nambu University)
  • Received : 2023.06.21
  • Accepted : 2023.09.22
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to confirm the safety of the operator's radiation exposure in the micro PET-CT image acquisition experiment using the 18F-FDG. The usage of 18F-FDG and the exposure dose of handlers were measured at University B in Metropolitan City A, which uses 18F-FDG for micro PET-CT image acquisition. As a result of the measurement, the exposure dose is far below the effective dose limit of radiation workers, 50 mSv per year, and the equivalent dose limit of 500 mSv per year for hands, feet, and skin. has been measured Since these exposure doses can be further increased according to the number of times of use of 18F-FDG, it is judged that the exposure dose compared to the handling amount of 18F-FDG shown in this study can be used as reference data. In addition, as changed environments such as the use of materials other than unopened RI are occurring in education and research environments, such as the use of 18F-FDG at University B, radiation exposure with more interest in safety management by checking the factors of radiation exposure of the handler concerned We will always do our best to reduce it.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported(in part) by research funds from Nambu University, 2022.

References

  1. Kwak BJ, Ji TJ and Min BI. 2009. The Safety Assessment of Surrounding Dose on Nuclear Medicine Test by Use The 18F-FDG. J. Korean Soc. Saf. 24(6):157-162. 
  2. Jung JW and Han EO. 2011. Prediction model for radiation damage defense environment of PET-CT. J. Radiat. Prot. Res. 17(7):360-361. 
  3. Cho YG, Kim SC and Ahn SM. 2013. Measuring external Radiation dose Ratio by Traits of Patients during Positron Emission Tomography (PET). J. Korea Contents Assoc. 13(12):860-868. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.12.860 
  4. Townsend DW. 2008. Multimodality imaging of structure and function. J. Phy. Med. Biol. 53(4):1-39. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/R01 
  5. Lang TF, Hasegawa BH, Liew SC, Brown JK, Blankespoor SC, Reilly SM, Gingold EL and Cann CE. 1992. Description of a prototype emission-transmission computed tomography imaging system. J. Nucl. Med. 33(10):1881-1888. 
  6. Jang DG. 2012. A Study on the Characteristic of 18F-FDG Excretion According to Use Diuretics in 18F-FDG of PET/CT. The Graduate School of Hanseo University. 
  7. Park HH, Lee JB, Jong PK, Lee JD, Won JW and Roh JH. Radiotechnologists and Radiation Exposure from PET and PET/CT Systems . J. Korean Occup. Environ. Med. 24(1):86-95. https://doi.org/10.0000/kjoem.2012.24.1.86 
  8. Cho KS and Ahn SM. 2015. A study of Brain Micro-PET Imaging and Bindingpotential with a Different Specific Activity of 18F-Fallypride in the Small Animal. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 15(9):418-424. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.09.418 
  9. Kim HS, Kim DH, Kim RG, Kim JM, Chung EH, Pedro RN, Lee MC and Kim HI. 2014. A rat model of photothrombotic capsular infarct with a marked motor deficit: a behavioral, histologic, and micro PET study. J. Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 34(4):683-689. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2014.2 
  10. Kang IS and Ahn SM. 2014. Evaluation of Usability and Radiation Dose Measurement Using Personal Radiation Exposure Dosimeter. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 14(11):864-870. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.864