한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육 (Education of Primary School Mathematics)

  • 제26권3호
  • /
  • Pages.163-180
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-6914(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9927(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TPACK과 기술수용모델을 활용한 초등교사의 수학 수업에서 인공지능 사용 의도 이해

Understanding Elementary School Teachers' Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Lesson Using TPACK and Technology Acceptance Model

  • 투고 : 2023.06.20
  • 심사 : 2023.07.17
  • 발행 : 2023.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 AI를 수학 수업에 사용하려는 초등학교 교사의 의도에 미치는 요인들에 대해 살펴보고 수학 수업에서 AI가 효과적으로 사용되기 위해 선행되어야할 요인을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 기술수용모델(Technology Acceptance Model)을 사용하여 초등학교 교사의 TPACK과 TAM 사이의 구조적 관계를 조사하였다. 그 결과, 초등학교 교사들의 TPACK은 인지된 사용 용이성과 유용성에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 인지된 사용 용이성과 인지된 유용성은 수학 수업에서 AI 활용에 대한 태도에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 인지된 사용 용이성, 인지된 유용성, 태도는 수학 수업에서의 AI 사용 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 초등학교 교사들이 수학 수업에서 AI에 대한 TPACK 역량이 높다고 인식할수록 수학 수업에서 AI를 사용하기가 더 쉽고 AI가 학생의 수학 학습 향상에 도움이 되는 유용한 도구로 인식할 수 있음을 의미한다. 또한 수학 수업에서 AI가 쉽게 사용할 수 있고 유용하다고 인식할수록 AI 사용 의도가 높아질 수 있다. 따라서 초등학교 교사들이 수학 수업에서 AI의 활용하려면 TPACK에 관한 지식 교육이 선행되어야하며, 수학 수업에서 AI 사용의 이점과 편리성에 대한 인식 개선이 함께 이루어져야 한다.

This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the intentions of elementary school teachers to use artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematics lessons and to identify the essential prerequisites for the effective implementation of AI in mathematics education. To achieve this purpose, we examined the structural relationship between elementary school teachers' TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) and the TAM(Technology Acceptance Model) using structural equation model. The findings of the study indicated that elementary school teachers' TPACK regarding the use of AI in mathematics instruction had a direct and significant impact on their perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of AI. In other words, when teachers possessed a higher level of TPACK competency in utilizing AI in mathematics classes, they found it easier to incorporate AI technology and recognized it as a valuable tool to enhance students' mathematics learning experience. In addition, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness directly influenced the attitudes of elementary school teachers towards the integration of AI in mathematics education. When teachers perceived AI as easy to use in their mathematics lessons, they were more likely to recognize its usefulness and develop a positive attitude towards its application in the classroom. Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and attitude towards AI integration in mathematics classes had a direct impact on the intentions of elementary school teachers to use AI in their mathematics instruction. As teachers perceived AI as easy to use, valuable, and developed a positive attitude towards its incorporation, their intention to utilize AI in mathematics education increased. In conclusion, this study shed light on the factors influencing elementary school teachers' intentions to use AI in mathematics classes. It revealed that teachers' TPACK plays a crucial role in facilitating the integration of AI in mathematics education. Additionally, the study emphasized the significance of enhancing teachers' awareness of the advantages and convenience of using AI in mathematics instruction to foster positive attitudes and intentions towards its implementation. By understanding these factors, educational stakeholders can develop strategies to effectively promote the utilization of AI in mathematics education, ultimately enhancing students' learning outcomes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고호경, 허난, 노지화(2021). RPP (Role-Play Presentation)를 통한 교사의 AI 교사와의 지각된 상호작용성 분석. 수학교육, 60(3), 321-340. 
  2. 김세영, 조미경(2022). 개별화 맞춤형 수학 학습을 지원하는 AI 기반 플랫폼 분석. 수학교육 논문집, 36(3), 417-438. 
  3. 송지준(2019). 논문통계의 이해와 적용: SPSS와 AMOS를 활용. 21세기사 
  4. 신원석, 고유정(2020). 교사들의 테크놀로지 활용 연구: TAM 모형을 중심으로. 한국교육학연구 (구 안암교육학연구), 26(2), 125-146. 
  5. 우종필(2013). 우종필교수의 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해. 한나래출판사. 
  6. Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100132. 
  7. Alshurafat, H., Al Shbail, M. O., Masadeh, W. M., Dahmash, F. & Al-Msiedeen, J. M. (2021). Factors affecting online accounting education during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated perspective of social capital theory, the theory of reasoned action and the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6995-7013.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10550-y
  8. Alsofyani, M. M., Aris, B. B., Eynon, R. & Majid, N. A. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of short blended online training workshop for TPACK development using technology acceptance model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 20-32. 
  9. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261. 
  10. Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D. & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers' readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. 
  11. Bishop, M. J. & Spector, J. (2014). Technology integration. In Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 817-818). Springer. 
  12. Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R. & Valcke, M. (2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 67, 21-35. 
  13. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. 
  14. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students' intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178-191.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004
  15. Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gasevic, D. & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100027. 
  16. Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers' professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. 
  17. Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M. & Marcos-Matas, G. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users' characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 1-19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1834356
  18. Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers' acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205-219. 
  20. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  21. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R. & Lin, X. (2018). I, teacher: using artificial intelligence (AI) and social robots in communication and instruction. Communication Education, 67(4), 473-480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1502459
  22. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, reading. Addison-Wesley. 
  23. Gong, M., Xu, Y. & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-374. 
  24. Gurer, M. D. & Akkaya, R. (2022). The influence of pedagogical beliefs on technology acceptance: a structural equation modeling study of pre-service mathematics teachers, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 479-495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5
  25. Habibi, A., Yusop, F. D., & Razak, R. A. (2020). The role of TPACK in affecting pre-service language teachers' ICT integration during teaching practices: Indonesian context. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 1929-1949.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10040-2
  26. Holden, H. & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers' technology acceptance. J ournal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367. 
  27. Horzum, M. B. & Gungoren, O. C. (2012). A model for beliefs, tool acceptance levels and web pedagogical content knowledge of science and technology preservice teachers towards web based instruction. Turkish Online J ournal of Distance Education, 13(3), 50-69. 
  28. Huang, Y. M. (2016). The factors that predispose students to continuously use cloud services: Social and technological perspectives. Computers & Education, 97, 86-96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.016
  29. Hsu, P. S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60, 30-40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0014-3
  30. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W. & Gasevic, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. 
  31. Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D. & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers' perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2653-2675.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z
  32. Islam, A. N. (2011). Understanding the continued usage intention of educators toward an e-learning system. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 3(2), 54-69.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jea.2011040106
  33. Jonassen, D. H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60-63. 
  34. Joo, B. K., Yang, B. & McLean, G. N. (2014). Employee creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, leader-member exchange quality, job autonomy, and proactivity. Human Resource Development International, 17(3), 297-317. 
  35. Joo, Y. J., Park, S. & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59. 
  36. Kim, K. & Kwon, K. (2023). Exploring the AI competencies of elementary school teachers in South Korea. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100137. 
  37. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press. 
  38. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(3rd ed.). Guilford Press. 
  39. Langran, E., Searson, M., Knezek, G. & Christensen, R. (2020, April). AI in teacher education, In D. Schmidt-Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 751-756). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 
  40. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  41. Liu, S. H. (2011, June). Modeling pre-service teachers' knowledge of, attitudes toward, and intentions for technology integration. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 3350-3355). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 
  42. Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L. & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599-607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
  43. Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J., Ogata, H., ... & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580820. 
  44. Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K. & Bell, R. L. (2013). Preservice teachers' TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 838-857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z
  45. Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Al-Manthari, A. (2021). Examining the impact of mathematics teachers' TPACK on their acceptance of online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(3), 196-212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1934613
  46. Mavrikis, M. & Holmes, W. (2019). Intelligent learning environments: Design, usage and analytics for future schools. In Yu, S., Niemi, H., Mason, J. (eds), Shaping future schools with digital technology: An international handbook (pp. 57-73). Springer. 
  47. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  48. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C. & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
  49. Pittalis, M. (2020). Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers' intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(9), 1385-1404. 
  50. Prieto, J. C. S., Miguelanez, S. O. & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2017). Utilizaran los futuros docentes las tecnologias moviles? Validacion de una propuesta de modelo TAM extendido. Revista de Educacion a Distancia (RED), 52, Articulo 5. 
  51. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F. & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. 
  52. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The Development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  53. Seufert, S., Guggemos, J. & Tarantini, E. (2020). Online professional learning communities for developing teachers' digital competences. Technology Supported Innovations in School Education, 159-173. 
  54. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. 
  55. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. 
  56. Teo, T. & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 124-142. 
  57. Teo, T., Zhou, M. & Noyes, J. (2016). Teachers and technology: Development of an extended theory of planned behavior. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 1033-1052. 
  58. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  59. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly, 36, 157-178. 
  60. Wang, X. W., Cao, Y. M. & Park, C. (2019). The relationships among community experience, community commitment, brand attitude, and purchase intention in social media. International J ournal of Information Management, 49, 475-488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.018
  61. Wang, Y., Liu, C. & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 116-129. 
  62. Xu, L. (2020, December). The Dilemma and countermeasures of AI in educational application. In Proceedings of the 2020 4th international conference on computer science and artificial intelligence (pp. 289-294). Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (CSAI). 
  63. Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, Y. (2021). A study of K-12 teachers' TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062-1075. 
  64. Yeo, S., Rutherford, T., & Campbell, T. (2022). Understanding elementary mathematics teachers' intention to use a digital game through the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11515-11536.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11073-w