Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

  • 제86권3호
  • /
  • Pages.176-182
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-3536(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-6184(eISSN)
대한결핵및호흡기학회 (The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems in the Pathologic Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer

  • Soo Han Kim (Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Mi-Hyun Kim (Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Min Ki Lee (Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung Seop Eom (Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.24
  • 심사 : 2023.05.12
  • 발행 : 2023.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Since the introduction of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for patients at high risk of lung cancer, the detection rate of suspicious lung cancer has increased. In addition, there have been many advances in therapeutics targeting oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, accurate pathological diagnosis of lung cancer, including molecular diagnosis, is increasingly important. This review examines the problems in the pathological diagnosis of suspected lung cancer. For successful pathological diagnosis of lung cancer, clinicians should determine the appropriate modality of the diagnostic procedure, considering individual patient characteristics, CT findings, and the possibility of complications. Furthermore, clinicians should make efforts to obtain a sufficient amount of tissue sample using non- or less-invasive procedures for pathological diagnosis and biomarker analysis.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by a clinical research grant from Pusan National University Hospital in 2023 and also by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (NRF-2022R1F1A1074117).

참고문헌

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
  2. Shin A, Oh CM, Kim BW, Woo H, Won YJ, Lee JS. Lung cancer epidemiology in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 2017;49:616-26. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.178
  3. Lee JG, Kim HC, Choi CM. Recent trends of lung cancer in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2021;84:89-95. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2020.0134
  4. Ko YH, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Park CK, Park CK, Suh YG, et al. Risk factors for primary lung cancer among never-smoking women in South Korea: a retrospective nationwide population-based cohort study. Korean J Intern Med 2020;35:692-702. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.283
  5. Chang S, Shim HS, Kim TJ, Choi YL, Kim WS, Shin DH, et al. Molecular biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group. J Pathol Transl Med 2021;55:181-91. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2021.03.23
  6. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
  7. Nanavaty P, Alvarez MS, Alberts WM. Lung cancer screening: advantages, controversies, and applications. Cancer Control 2014;21:9-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327481402100102
  8. Fielding DI, Robinson PJ, Kurimoto N. Biopsy site selection for endobronchial ultrasound guide-sheath transbronchial biopsy of peripheral lung lesions. Intern Med J 2008;38:77-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01473.x
  9. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e93S-120.
  10. Nunez ER, Caverly TJ, Zhang S, Glickman ME, Qian SX, Boudreau JH, et al. Invasive procedures and associated complications after initial lung cancer screening in a national cohort of veterans. Chest 2022;162:475-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.02.031
  11. Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015;70 Suppl 2:ii1-54. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207168
  12. Sainz Zuniga PV, Vakil E, Molina S, Bassett RL Jr, Ost DE. Sensitivity of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscopy for lung cancer in patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis. Chest 2020;157:994-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.042
  13. Ali MS, Trick W, Mba BI, Mohananey D, Sethi J, Musani AI. Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology 2017;22:443-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12980
  14. Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011;37:902-10. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00075310
  15. Folch EE, Labarca G, Ospina-Delgado D, Kheir F, Majid A, Khandhar SJ, et al. Sensitivity and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung cancer diagnosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2020;158:1753-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.534
  16. Chae KJ, Hong H, Yoon SH, Hahn S, Jin GY, Park CM, et al. Non-diagnostic results of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:12428.
  17. Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, Iguchi T, Fujiwara H, Sakurai J, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of 1,000 pulmonary lesions performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles: diagnostic yield and risk factors for diagnostic failure. Chest 2009;136:1612-7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-0370
  18. Fontaine-Delaruelle C, Souquet PJ, Gamondes D, Pradat E, De Leusse A, Ferretti GR, et al. Negative predictive value of transthoracic core-needle biopsy: a multicenter study. Chest 2015;148:472-80. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-1907
  19. Lee KH, Lim KY, Suh YJ, Hur J, Han DH, Kang MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsies: a multicenter study. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1300-10. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0189
  20. Tongbai T, McDermott S, Kiranantawat N, Muse VV, Wu CC, Shepard JA, et al. Non-diagnostic CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the lung: predictive factors and final diagnoses. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:1515-26. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0014
  21. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:137-44. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00003
  22. Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2017;27:138-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8
  23. Shin YJ, Yun G, Yoon SH, Song H, Kim J, Kim J, et al. Accuracy and complications of percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy for the diagnosis of malignancy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Radiol 2021;31:9000-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08038-x
  24. Kim H, Park CM, Yoon SH, Hwang EJ, Lee JH, Ahn SY, et al. Open bronchus sign on CT: a risk factor for hemoptysis after percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:880-7. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.880
  25. Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT, Tsay PK, Lui KW, Cheung YC, et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004;126:748-54. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.3.748
  26. Chami HA, Faraj W, Yehia ZA, Badour SA, Sawan P, Rebeiz K, et al. Predictors of pneumothorax after CT-guided transthoracic needle lung biopsy: the role of quantitative CT. Clin Radiol 2015;70:1382-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.08.003
  27. Lim J, Shin KM, Lee K, Lim JK, Kim HJ, Cho SH, et al. Relationship between emphysema severity and the location of lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:540-5. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13992
  28. Naccache JM, Gibiot Q, Monnet I, Antoine M, Wislez M, Chouaid C, et al. Lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: a literature review. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:3829-44. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.75
  29. Lee J, Kim C, Seol HY, Chung HS, Mok J, Lee G, et al. Safety and diagnostic yield of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy for peripheral lung lesions in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Respiration 2022;101:401-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000520034
  30. Ishida T, Asano F, Yamazaki K, Shinagawa N, Oizumi S, Moriya H, et al. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound to diagnose small peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomised trial. Thorax 2011;66:1072-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.145490
  31. Oki M, Saka H, Kitagawa C, Tanaka S, Shimokata T, Mori K, et al. Novel thin bronchoscope with a 1.7-mm working channel for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Eur Respir J 2008;32:465-71. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00169107
  32. Oki M, Saka H, Asano F, Kitagawa C, Kogure Y, Tsuzuku A, et al. Use of an ultrathin vs thin bronchoscope for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomized trial. Chest 2019; 156:954-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.038
  33. Lee KH, Lim KY, Suh YJ, Hur J, Han DH, Kang MJ, et al. Nondiagnostic percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions: a multicenter study of malignancy risk. Radiology 2019;290:814-23. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181482
  34. Haas BM, Elicker BM, Nguyen J, Ordovas KG, Jones KD, Henry TS, et al. Nondiagnostic computed tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsies are more likely when infection is suspected. J Thorac Imaging 2016; 31:151-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000207
  35. Min JW, Lee SM, Chung DH, Yim JJ, Yang SC, Yoo CG, et al. Clinical significance of non-diagnostic pathology results from percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy: experience of a tertiary hospital without an on-site cytopathologist. Respirology 2009;14:1042-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01610.x
  36. Calhoun P, Feldman PS, Armstrong P, Black WC, Pope TL, Minor GR, et al. The clinical outcome of needle aspirations of the lung when cancer is not diagnosed. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:592-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63066-4
  37. Santambrogio L, Nosotti M, Bellaviti N, Pavoni G, Radice F, Caputo V. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of solitary pulmonary nodules: a prospective, randomized study of immediate cytologic evaluation. Chest 1997;112:423-5. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.112.2.423
  38. Larscheid RC, Thorpe PE, Scott WJ. Percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: a comprehensive review of its current role in the diagnosis and treatment of lung tumors. Chest 1998;114:704-9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.114.3.704
  39. Choi SH, Chae EJ, Kim JE, Kim EY, Oh SY, Hwang HJ, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm: analysis of outcomes of 305 procedures from a tertiary referral center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:964-70. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10156
  40. Kim GR, Hur J, Lee SM, Lee HJ, Hong YJ, Nam JE, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 2011;21:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1936-y
  41. Wang W, Yu L, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Chi C, Zhan P, et al. Radial EBUS versus CT-guided needle biopsy for evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Oncotarget 2018;9:15122-31. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23952
  42. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19:254-66. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0013
  43. Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018; 15:81-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166
  44. Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, Chitale DA, Dacic S, Giaccone G, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn 2013;15:415-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.03.001
  45. Kim I, Eom JS, Kim AR, Lee CH, Lee G, Jo EJ, et al. Molecular analysis of small tissue samples obtained via transbronchial lung biopsy using radial probe endobronchial ultrasound. PLoS One 2019;14:e0212672.
  46. Murakami S, Yokose T, Nemoto D, Suzuki M, Usui R, Nakahara Y, et al. Suitability of bronchoscopic biopsy tissue samples for next-generation sequencing. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:391.
  47. Kage H, Kohsaka S, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Hiraishi Y, Sato J, Nagayama K, et al. Small lung tumor biopsy samples are feasible for high quality targeted next generation sequencing. Cancer Sci 2019;110:2652-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14112
  48. Udagawa H, Kirita K, Naito T, Nomura S, Ishibashi M, Matsuzawa R, et al. Feasibility and utility of transbronchial cryobiopsy in precision medicine for lung cancer: prospective single-arm study. Cancer Sci 2020;111:2488-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14489
  49. Matsumoto Y, Nakai T, Tanaka M, Imabayashi T, Tsuchida T, Ohe Y. Diagnostic outcomes and safety of cryobiopsy added to conventional sampling methods: an observational study. Chest 2021;160:1890-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.015
  50. Schuhmann M, Bostanci K, Bugalho A, Warth A, Schnabel PA, Herth FJ, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided cryobiopsies in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a feasibility study. Eur Respir J 2014;43:233-9. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00011313
  51. Sryma PB, Mittal S, Madan NK, Tiwari P, Hadda V, Mohan A, et al. Efficacy of radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) guided transbronchial cryobiopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL...s): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pulmonology 2023;29:50-64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.12.006