DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modification of HEART Pathway for Patients With Chest Pain: A Korean Perspective

  • Bora Chae (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin Ahn (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Youn-Jung Kim (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung Mok Ryoo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang Hwan Sohn (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Dong-Woo Seo (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Won Young Kim (Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.27
  • 심사 : 2023.05.24
  • 발행 : 2023.09.01

초록

Background and Objectives: The History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART) pathway was developed to identify patients at low risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department. Methods: We modified the HEART pathway by replacing the Korean cut-off of 25 kg/m2 with the conventional threshold of 30 kg/m2 in the definition of obesity among risk factors. The primary outcome was a MACE within 30 days, which included acute myocardial infarction, primary coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and all-cause death. Results: Of the 1,304 patients prospectively enrolled, MACE occurred in 320 (24.5%). The modified HEART pathway identified 37.3% of patients as low-risk compared with 38.3% using the HEART pathway. Of the 500 patients classified as low-risk with HEART pathway, 8 (1.6%) experienced MACE, and of the 486 low-risk patients with modified HEART pathway, 4 (0.8%) experienced MACE. The modified HEART pathway had a sensitivity of 98.8%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.2%, a specificity of 49.0%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38.6%, compared with the original HEART pathway, with a sensitivity of 97.5%, a NPV of 98.4%, a specificity of 50.0%, and a PPV of 38.8%. Conclusions: When applied to Korean population, modified HEART pathway could identify patients safe for early discharge more accurately by using body mass index cut-off levels suggested for Koreans.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government Ministry of Science and ICT (grant number: NRF-2021R1G1A101056711).

참고문헌

  1. McCarthy BD, Beshansky JR, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:579-82.
  2. Peacock WF, Maisel AS, Mueller C, et al. Finding acute coronary syndrome with serial troponin testing for rapid assessment of cardiac ischemic symptoms (FAST-TRAC): a study protocol. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2022;9:140-5.
  3. Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:2153-8.
  4. Mahler SA, Lenoir KM, Wells BJ, et al. Safely identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circulation 2018;138:2456-68.
  5. Parto P, Lavie CJ. Obesity and CardiovascularDiseases. Curr Probl Cardiol 2017;42:376-94.
  6. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-63.
  7. Seo MH, Lee WY, Kim SS, et al. 2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr 2019;28:40-5.
  8. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation 2018;138:e618-51.
  9. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.
  10. Cook NR, Ridker PM. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:795-802.
  11. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, Tomaszewski CA, Nestler D, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2018;72:e65-106.
  12. Than M, Herbert M, Flaws D, et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the emergency department?: a clinical survey. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:752-4.
  13. Chen Z, Iona A, Parish S, et al. Adiposity and risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in 0.5 million Chinese men and women: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e630-40.
  14. Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, et al. The HEART pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015;8:195-203.
  15. Stopyra J, Snavely AC, Hiestand B, et al. Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification. Heart 2020;106:977-84.
  16. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;144:e368-454.
  17. Oliver JJ, Streitz MJ, Hyams JM, et al. An external validation of the HEART pathway among emergency department patients with chest pain. Intern Emerg Med 2018;13:1249-55.