Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is It Safe to Preserve Left Atrial Appendage During Maze Procedure?

  • Kyungsub Song (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo Sung Jang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine) ;
  • Namhee Park (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yun Seok Kim (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jae Bum Kim (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.02.19
  • Accepted : 2023.05.03
  • Published : 2023.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The left atrial appendage (LAA) can contribute significantly to LA mechanical contraction. Nevertheless, the preventive effect of LAA occlusion during the maze procedure against cerebral infarction remains controversial. In this study, we compared the surgical, cardiac hemodynamic, and neurologic outcomes between LAA preservation and occlusion performed during the maze procedure. Methods: Between January 2015 and August 2021, 252 patients underwent the maze procedure using cryoablation at our medical center. After excluding patients according to our exclusion criteria (i.e., mechanical prosthesis implantation, preexisting LAA thrombus), LAA was preserved in 113 patients (non-occlusion group) and occluded in 75 patients (occlusion group). Outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Results: PSM did not reveal significant intergroup differences in baseline characteristics between the non-occlusion (n=53) and occlusion (n=53) groups. During a median follow-up of 44 months, 2 patients in the non-occlusion group (3.8%) experienced ischemic strokes. There was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from stroke (p=0.19) and major adverse cardiac events (p=0.43) between the 2 groups. Through echocardiography at 1-year follow-up, a statistically significant difference in LA mechanical contraction was observed between the non-occlusion group and occlusion group (24 of 33 [72.7%] vs. 18 of 37 [48.6%], respectively; p=0.04). Conclusions: In this study, preservation of the LAA during the maze procedure resulted in better LA function than LAA occlusion, with similar rates of stroke.

Keywords

References

  1. Wolf PA, Dawber TR, Thomas HE Jr, Kannel WB. Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study. Neurology 1978;28:973-7.
  2. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:755-9.
  3. Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, et al. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1253-8.
  4. Stollberger C, Schneider B, Finsterer J. Elimination of the left atrial appendage to prevent stroke or embolism? Anatomic, physiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations. Chest 2003;124:2356-62.
  5. Yamanaka K, Sekine Y, Nonaka M, et al. Left atrial appendage contributes to left atrial booster function after the maze procedure: quantitative assessment with multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:361-5.
  6. Yoshihara F, Nishikimi T, Kosakai Y, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide secretion and body fluid balance after bilateral atrial appendectomy by the maze procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:213-9.
  7. Whitlock RP, Belley-Cote EP, Paparella D, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery to prevent stroke. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2081-91.
  8. Buber J, Luria D, Sternik L, et al. Left atrial contractile function following a successful modified Maze procedure at surgery and the risk for subsequent thromboembolic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1614-21.
  9. Greenland S, Mickey RM. Re: "The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation". Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:1066.
  10. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 2001;285:2370-5.
  11. Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L, et al. Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin. Circulation 2004;110:2287-92.
  12. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation study. Final results. Circulation 1991;84:527-39.
  13. Lee CH, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW. Left atrial appendage resection versus preservation during the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:124-32.
  14. Hondo T, Okamoto M, Yamane T, et al. The role of the left atrial appendage. A volume loading study in open-chest dogs. Jpn Heart J 1995;36:225-34.
  15. Yamamoto N. Experimental study of combined left atrium resection for lung cancer. Nippon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1986;34:958-65.
  16. Isobe F, Kumano H, Ishikawa T, et al. A new procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation: bilateral appendage-preserving maze procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1473-8.
  17. Schneider B, Stollberger C, Sievers HH. Surgical closure of the left atrial appendage - a beneficial procedure? Cardiology 2005;104:127-32.
  18. Bieging ET, Morris A, Chang L, Dagher L, Marrouche NF, Cates J. Statistical shape analysis of the left atrial appendage predicts stroke in atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;37:2521-7.
  19. Ogata J, Yutani C, Otsubo R, et al. Heart and vessel pathology underlying brain infarction in 142 stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2008;63:770-81.
  20. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020;141:e139-596.