Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Monitoring for Citizen Participation in Artificial Nest Boxes Using Mobile Applications

모바일 애플리케이션을 활용한 시민참여 인공새집 모니터링 방안 연구

  • 김경태 (단국대학교 대학원 생명공학대학 환경원예조경학과) ;
  • 이현정 (단국대학교 대학원 생명공학대학 환경원예조경학과 ) ;
  • 김채영 (단국대학교 대학원 생명공학대학 환경원예조경학과 ) ;
  • 김휘문 (단국대학교 대학원 생명공학대학 환경원예조경학과 ) ;
  • 송원경 (단국대학교 생명공학대학 환경원예조경학부 )
  • Received : 2023.04.06
  • Accepted : 2023.06.15
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Great tit (Parus major) is a bioindicator species that can measure environmental changes in urban ecosystems and plays an important role in maintaining health as a representative insectivorous bird. Researchers have utilized artificial nest box surveys to understand the reproductive ecology of the Paridae family of birds, including the Great tits, but it is difficult to conduct a macroscopic study due to spatial and temporal limitations. This study designed and applied a citizen-participatory monitoring of artificial nest boxes project to transcend the limitations of expert-centered monitoring methods. The Suwon Front Yard Bird Monitoring Team installed artificial nest boxes in green spaces in Suwon, Gyeonggi Province and observed the reproductive ecology of the Paridae family through the participation of voluntary citizen surveyors. Participants were recruited through an online survey from February 9 to February 22, 2021, and they directly performed from installation to observation of artificial next boxes from February 23 to August 31, 2021. Online education was provided to the volunteers for the entire monitoring process to lower the entry barrier for non-expert citizen surveyors and collect consistent data, and observation records were collected through a mobile app. A total of 98 citizen surveyors participated in the citizen-participatory monitoring of artificial nest boxes project, and 175 (84.95%) of the 256 distributed artificial nest boxes were installed in green spaces in Suwon City. Among the installed artificial nest boxes, the results of the citizen science project were confirmed for 173 (83.98%), excluding two boxes with position coordinate generation errors. A total of 987 artificial nest box observation records were collected from citizen surveyors, with a minimum of one time, a maximum of 26 times, and an average of 5.71±4.37 times. The number of observations of artificial birdhouses per month was 70 times (7.09%) in February, 444 times (44.98%) in March, 284 times (28.77%) in April, 133 times (13.48%) in May, 46 times (4.66%) in June, 6 times (0.61%) in July, and 4 times (0.41%) in August. Birds using the artificial nest boxes were observed in 57 (32.95%) of the 173 installed artificial nest boxes, and they included Great tit (Parus major) using 12 boxes (21.05%), Varied Tit (Parus varius) using 7 boxes (12.28%), and unidentified birds using 38 boxes (66.67%). This study is the first to consider citizen participation in the monitoring of artificial nest boxes, a survey method for the reproductive ecology of the Paridae family, including Great tits, and it can be utilized as basic data for the design of ecological monitoring combined with citizen science in the future.

박새는 도시생태계 내 환경변화를 측정할 수 있는 생물지표종이자 대표적인 식충성 조류로 건전성 유지와 같은 중요한 역할을 맡고 있다. 연구자들은 박새과 조류의 번식생태 파악을 위해 인공새집 조사방법을 활용하고 있으나, 공간적·시간적 한계로 거시적 관점의 연구를 진행하기에는 어려움이 있다. 본 연구는 전문가 중심으로 수행된 기존 인공새집 모니터링이 갖는 한계를 벗어나고자 시민참여 인공새집 모니터링 프로젝트를 설계하였다. '수원시 앞마당 조류 모니터링단'은 시민조사원들의 자발적인 참여를 통해 경기도 수원시 내 녹지공간에 인공새집을 설치하고 박새과 조류의 번식생태를 관찰하는 프로젝트이다. 2021년 2월 9일부터 2월 22일까지 온라인 설문조사를 통해 참가자를 모집하였고, 시민조사원은 2021년 2월 23일부터 8월 31일까지 인공새집 설치부터 관찰까지 직접 수행하였다. 비전문가인 시민조사원들의 진입장벽을 낮추고 일관된 데이터를 수집하기 위해 모니터링 과정 전반에 대한 온라인 교육을 수행하였고 모바일 애플리케이션을 이용하여 인공새집 관찰기록을 수집하였다. 시민참여 인공새집 모니터링 프로젝트에는 98명의 시민조사원이 참여하였고 배포된 206개의 인공새집 중 175(84.95%)개가 수원시 내 녹지공간에 설치되었다. 설치된 인공새집 중 위치 좌표 생성 오류가 발생한 2건을 제외한 173(83.98%)개를 대상으로 시민과학 프로젝트 결과를 확인했다. 시민조사원으로부터 수집한 인공새집 관찰기록은 총 987회이며, 최솟값은 1회, 최댓값은 26회, 평균은 5.71±4.37회로 나타났다. 월별 인공새집 관찰 횟수는 2월 70회(7.09%), 3월 444회(44.98%), 4월 284회(28.77%), 5월 133회(13.48%), 6월 46회(4.66%), 7월 6회(0.61%), 8월 4회(0.41%)로 조사되었다. 설치된 173개의 인공새집 중 57개(32.95%)에서 조류의 이용을 관찰할 수 있었고 박새 12개소(21.05%), 곤줄박이 7개소(12.28%), 미동정 조류 38개소(66.67%)로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 박새과 조류의 번식생태를 조사방법으로 활용되는 인공새집 모니터링에 시민의 참여 가능성을 처음으로 검토한 연구로 향후 시민과학을 접목한 생태모니터링 설계의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 환경부 한국환경산업기술원의 생태계 기반 탄소흡수원 조성·관리 기술개발사업(RS-2023-00218245)의 지원을 받아 작성되었습니다.

References

  1. Andrachuk, M., M. Marschke, C. Hings and D. Armitage(2019) Smartphone technologies supporting community-based environmental monitoring and implementation: A systematic scoping review. Biological Conservation 237: 430-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.026
  2. Blaney, R.J., G. Jones, A. Philippe and M. Pocock(2016) Citizen science and environmental monitoring: Towards a methodology for evaluating opportunities, costs and benefits. Final Report on behalf of UKEOF.
  3. Cha, J.G., T.Y. Choi, D.I. Kang and E.H. Jung(2019) Analysis of the cold air flow in Suwon for the application of urban wind corridor. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 22(4): 24-38. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2019.22.4.024
  4. Darwall, W.R. and N.K. Dulvy(1996) An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania-A case study. Biological Conservation 78(3): 223-231.
  5. Dauwe, T., E. Janssens, L. Bervoets, R. Blust and M. Eens(2005) Heavy-metal concentrations in female laying great tits (Parus major) and their clutches. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 49: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-0209-z
  6. Deutsch, C., D. Bilenca and G. Agostini(2017) In search of the horned frog (Ceratophrys ornata) in Argentina: complementing field surveys with citizen science. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 12(3): 664-672.
  7. Dickinson, J.L., J. Shirk, D. Bonter, R. Bonney, R.L. Crain, J. Martin and K. Purcell(2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236
  8. Evans, M.R., D.B. Lank, W.S. Boyd and F. Cooke(2002) A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow's Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. The Condor 104(3): 610-619. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/104.3.610
  9. Fontaine, A., A. Simard, N. Brunet and K.H. Elliott(2022) Scientific contributions of citizen science applied to rare or threatened animals. Conservation Biology 36(6): e13976.
  10. Forrester, G., P. Baily, D. Conetta, L. Forrester, E. Kintzing and L. Jarecki(2015) Comparing monitoring data collected by volunteers and professionals shows that citizen scientists can detect long-term change on coral reefs. Journal for Nature Conservation 24: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.01.002
  11. Foster-Smith, J. and S.M. Evans(2003) The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation 113(2): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00373-7
  12. Gardiner, M.M., L.L. Allee, P.M. Brown, J.E. Losey, H.E. Roy and R.R. Smyth(2012) Lessons from lady beetles: Accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(9): 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1890/110185
  13. Haklay, M., S. Mazumdar and J. Wardlaw(2018) Citizen science for observing and understanding the earth. In: Earth observation open science and innovation. Springer, pp.69-88.
  14. Hsing, P.Y., R.A. Hill, G.C. Smith, S. Bradley, S.E. Green, V.T. Kent and P.A. Stephens(2022) Large-scale mammal monitoring: The potential of a citizen science camera-trapping project in the United Kingdom. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 3(4): e12180.
  15. Hyun, W.J., W.S. Lee and H. Chung(2021) Nesting site availability of tits (Parus spp.) in Mount Buram, Korea. Korean Journal of Ornithology 28(2): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.30980/kjo.2021.12.28.2.75
  16. Jeong, H.J., E.A. Cho, H.S. Ko and G.S. Jang(2012) A research on the reproductive properties of great tits in the urban forests. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 15(5): 155-163. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.155
  17. Jo, H.W., W.S. Lee and H. Chung(2021) Nesting site availability of tits (Parus spp.) in Mount Buram, Korea. Korean Journal of Ornithology 28(2): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.30980/kjo.2021.12.28.2.75
  18. Johnston, A., E. Matechou and E.B. Dennis(2023) Outstanding challenges and future directions for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 14(1): 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13834
  19. Jung, S.Y.(2015) Analysis of the current utilization situation and type of the card news of the big data era. The Korean Society of Design Culture 21(4): 609-620.
  20. Kee, K.D. and S.W. Lee(2004) Geomorphological environment of Suwon Basin. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers 10(2): 300-312.
  21. Kim, I.H., A.R. Yang, S.U. Kim, D.H. Han, G.S. Shin, S.J. Park, H.Y. Kim and Y.M. Kim(2022) Study on carbon storage calculation and green roof simulation modules to understand the current status and potential of urban ecosystem services: In case of Suwon-si in Korea. Journal of Korea Planning Association 57(1): 128-144.
  22. Kim, J.Y. and C.H. Oh(2016) Analysis of current usage of bird houses in Gil-dong Eco-Park. Association for the Study of Literature & Environment 15: 55-78.
  23. Kim, K.T., H.J. Lee, W.M. Kim and W.K. Song(2022a) The characteristics of heavy metal(Zn, Pb) accumulations in Paridae nesting material. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 36(6): 566-574. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2022.36.6.566
  24. Kim, K.T., H.J. Lee, W.M. Kim and W.K. Song(2022b) A case of mixed brood of the Daurian Redstart Phoenicurus auroreus and Great Tit Parus major in artificial nest boxes. Korean Journal of Ornithology 29(2): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.30980/KJO.2022.12.29.2.48
  25. Kim, K.T., H.J. Lee, W.M. Kim, S.Y. Kim and W.K. Song(2021) A study on the characteristics of Paridae nesting material by urban green area type. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 35(3): 256-264. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2021.35.3.256
  26. Kim, M.H., S.K. Choi, S.W. Choi, C.I. Jung, Y.J. Oh, M.K. Kim, J.U. Eo, S.J. Yeob and J.H. Bang(2021) Selection of 30 indicator species for climate change in agroecosystem using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and expert questionnaire survey. Journal of Climate Change Research 12(5-1): 421-429. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.5.421
  27. Kim, S.Y., W.M. Kim, W.K. Song and E.J. Hyeong(2018). Home-range analysis of varied tit (Parus varius) in the post fledging period by using radio-tracking. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 21(1): 95-102.
  28. Kim, Y.G.(2005) Development of ecological impact assessment ideal biomarkers for environmental contamination. Andong National University, 498pp.
  29. Koh, J.K. and M.J. Ye(2020) A study on types and characteristics of citizen science to address environmental issues in Korea. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 28(4): 181-213. https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2020.28.4.181
  30. Lee, K.I., S.J. Lee, N. Tuvshinjargal, E.S. Lee, G.G. Lee and S.W. Jeon(2020) Study on heat vulnerability assessment using biotope map-A case study of Suwon, Korea-. Journal of Climate 11(6-1): 629-641.
  31. Lee, W.S. and S.W. Kim(1996) Foods and nest boxes of wild birds in natural and degraded ecosystems. Korean Journal of Ornithology 3(1): 43-50.
  32. Lim, C.W., S.C. Kim and Y.H. Kwon(2012) A study on utilization of artificial nest boxes of forest-dwelling birds. Korean Journal of Nature Conservation 10(3_4): 177-185. https://doi.org/10.30960/kjnc.2012.10.3_4.177
  33. MacKenzie, C.M., G. Murray, R. Primack and D. Weihrauch(2017) Lessons from citizen science: Assessing volunteer-collected plant phenology data with Mountain Watch. Biological Conservation 208: 121-126.
  34. Mair, L. and A. Ruete(2016). Explaining spatial variation in the recording effort of citizen science data across multiple taxa. PloS One 11(1): e0147796.
  35. McKinley, D., A. Miller-Rushing, H. Ballard, R. Bonney, H. Brown, D. Evans and M. Soukup(2015) Investing in citizen science can improve natural resource management and environmental protection. F1000Research, 6.
  36. McKinley, D.C., A.J. Miller-Rushing, H.L. Ballard, R. Bonney, H. Brown, S.C. Cook-Patton and M.A. Soukup(2017) Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation 208: 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
  37. Moulin, N.(2020) When citizen science highlights alien invasive species in France: The case of Indochina mantis, Hierodula patellifera (Insecta, Mantodea, Mantidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 8.
  38. Newman, G., A. Wiggins, A. Crall, E. Graham, S. Newman and K. Crowston(2012) The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1890/110294
  39. NIBR(2021) NIBR Korean biodiversity. https://species.nibr.go.kr. Accessed on 20 July, 2021.
  40. Nowak, M.M., K. Dziob, L. Ludwisiak and J. Chmiel(2020) Mobile GIS applications for environmental field surveys: A state of the art. Global Ecology and Conservation 23: e01089.
  41. Parsons, J., R. Lukyanenko and Y. Wiersma(2011) Easier citizen science is better. Nature 471(7336): 37-37. https://doi.org/10.1038/471037a
  42. Pocock, M.J., H.E. Roy, C.D. Preston and D.B. Roy(2015) The biological records centre: A pioneer of citizen science. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115(3): 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12548
  43. Rhim, S.J., S.H. Son, M.J. Kim and J.H. Kang(2008) Use of artificial nest boxes of tits in coniferous and deciduous forests. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 97(1): 83-87.
  44. Roetman, P., H. Tindle and C. Litchfield(2018) Management of pet cats: The impact of the cat tracker citizen science project in South Australia. Animals 8(11): 190.
  45. Rowley, J.J., C.T. Callaghan, T. Cutajar, C. Portway, K. Potter, S. Mahony and A. Woods(2019) FrogID: Citizen scientists provide validated biodiversity data on frogs of Australia. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 14(1): 155-170.
  46. Saag, P., R. Mand, V. Tilgar, P. Kilgas, M. Magi and E. Rasmann(2011) Plumage bacterial load is related to species, sex, biometrics and fledging success in co-occurring cavity-breeding passerines. Acta Ornithologica 46(2): 191-201. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164511X62596
  47. Snall, T., O. Kindvall, J. Nilsson, and T. Part(2011) Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biological Conservation 144(2): 804-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.010
  48. Song, W.K.(2018) Analysis of urban green areas using NDVI and development of a model to analyze bird diversity in urban parks. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 21(1): 73-82.
  49. Song, W.K.(2020) Home range analysis of great tit (Parus major) before and after fledging in an urban park. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 23(1): 97-106. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2020.23.1.97
  50. Suzuki-Ohno, Y., J. Yokoyama, T. Nakashizuka and M. Kawata(2017) Utilization of photographs taken by citizens for estimating bumblebee distributions. Scientific Reports 7(1): 11215.
  51. Theobald, E.J., A.K. Ettinger, H.K. Burgess, L.B. DeBey, N.R. Schmidt, H.E. Froehlich and J.K. Parrish(2015) Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation 181: 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
  52. Tiago, P., A. Ceia-Hasse, T.A. Marques, C. Capinha and H.M. Pereira(2017) Spatial distribution of citizen science casuistic observations for different taxonomic groups. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
  53. Torres, A.C., B. Bedessem, N. Deguines and C. Fontaine(2022) Online data sharing with virtual social interactions favor scientific and educational successes in a biodiversity citizen science project. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1-19.
  54. Tulloch, A.I., H.P. Possingham, L.N. Joseph, J. Szabo and T.G. Martin(2013) Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165: 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025
  55. Verner, J., M.L. Morison and C.J. Ralph(1986) Wildlife 2000: Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Wisconsin, 470pp.
  56. Wang, J.M. and S.R. Beissinger(2011) Partial incubation in birds: Its occurrence, function, and quantification. The Auk 128(3): 454-466. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.10208
  57. Werenkraut, V., F. Baudino and H.E. Roy(2020) Citizen science reveals the distribution of the invasive harlequin ladybird (Harmonia axyridis Pallas) in Argentina. Biological Invasions 22: 2915-2921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02312-7
  58. Yang, X., X. Tan, C. Chen and Y. Wang(2020) The influence of urban park characteristics on bird diversity in Nanjing, China. Avian Research 11: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0187-0
  59. Young, A.P.(2014) An exploratory study about the motivation of closed-type social network service: Focusing on user of 'Naver Band'. Korean Association Of Industrial Business Administration 29(4): 157-185. https://doi.org/10.22903/JBR.2014.29.4.157
  60. Yun, J.W., W.H. Shin, J.H. Kim, S.Y. Yi, D.H. Kim, Y.V. Kim and Y.K. Song(2021) Spatial usage and patterns of corvus frugilegus after sunrise and sunset in Suwon using citizen science. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(6): 35-48. https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2021.24.6.35