DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anatomy acts concerning body and organ donations across the globe: past, present and future with a special emphasis on the indian scenario

  • Surraj Susai (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Mrudula Chandrupatla (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Rohini Motwani (Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2022.08.23
  • Accepted : 2022.10.13
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

From the era of pre-historic times, the ancient Indians and the Greeks highlighted the importance of body and organ donations thereby emphasizing the need for anatomical sciences in medicine through the use of effective dissections for the same. However, after the Renaissance, there was a surge in dissections throughout the world, particularly in Europe, as a result of which various laws were enacted by governments concerning the procurement of bodies for the purpose of scientific dissections, which were later promulgated throughout the world through various anatomical acts. The situation in India was quite similar to that of Britain until its independence in 1947, after which different Indian states formulated their own anatomy acts that had their own merits and pitfalls. Hence, this literature review serves to highlight the various acts throughout history and would serve as a guide to emphasize the future perspectives of formulating a centralized unified anatomy act for the Indian nation that could possibly be the need of the hour.

Keywords

References

  1. Narayana A. Medical science in ancient Indian culture with special reference to Atharvaveda. Bull Indian Inst Hist Med Hyderabad 1995;25:100-10.
  2. Mitra J. Glimpses of the advancement of medical science as depicted in the Mahabharata. Bull Indian Inst Hist Med Hyderabad 1995;25:20-37.
  3. Prasad PV. Atharvaveda and its materia medica. Bull Indian Inst Hist Med Hyderabad 2000;30:83-92.
  4. Mukherjee PK, Nema NK, Venkatesh P, Debnath PK. Changing scenario for promotion and development of Ayurveda--way forward. J Ethnopharmacol 2012;143:424-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.07.036
  5. Magee R. Art macabre: resurrectionists and anatomists. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:377-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02127.x
  6. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol 2015;48:153-69. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153
  7. Yammine K. The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there? Teach Learn Med 2014;26:184-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
  8. Tamuli RP, Sarmah S, Saikia B. Organ donation - "attitude and awareness among undergraduates and postgraduates of NorthEast India". J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:130-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_206_18
  9. Sahu SK, Rath B, Rath S, Panigrahi S. Knowledge and attitude of educated people towards organ and body donation: a cross-sectional study in Southern Odisha. Sch J Appl Med Sci 2017;5:2456-62.
  10. Bharambe V, Puranam V, Manvikar PR, Bajpayee P. Anatomy acts in India: a review. Eur J Anat 2019;23:469-77.
  11. Habbal O. The science of anatomy: a historical timeline. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2017;17:e18-22. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2016.17.01.004
  12. Lalwani R, Kotgirwar S, Athavale SA. Changing medical education scenario: a wakeup call for reforms in Anatomy Act. BMC Med Ethics 2020;21:63.
  13. Dope SA, Bhusari PA, Kulkarni PR, Diwan CV. Body donationthe life after death. MedPulse 2015;2:216-20.
  14. Guidelines for cadaver and whole body deceased donation, 2014. No. 14/02/Misc/H & FW/2013/8110-20(5.9.14) [Internet]. New Delhi: Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi; 2013 [cited 2014 Jan 18]. Available from: https://dshm.delhi.gov.in/mis/(S(mr4go54ormtlapcdwm1vhxux))/orders/Guidelines_for_cadaver.pdf.
  15. Rules and Regulation for transfer of cadaver from one college to another Medical College, 2005. No. 183/MSF/2005/17.09.2005. Karnataka: Government of Karnataka; 2005.
  16. Ajita R, Singh YI. Body donation and its relevance in anatomy learning: a review. J Anat Soc India 2007;56:44-7.
  17. FICEM Federative International Committee for Ethics and Medical Humanities of the International Federation of Associations of anatomists (IFAA). Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus 2012;2012:4-5.
  18. Champney TH, Hildebrandt S, Gareth Jones D, Winkelmann A. Bodies R US: ethical views on the commercialization of the dead in medical education and research. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12:317-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1809
  19. The Uttar Pradesh anatomy act, 1956. Act no. 6 of 1957. Uttar Pradesh: The Uttar Pradesh Gazette, Extraordinary; 1957.
  20. The Gujarat anatomy act, 2011. Act no. 10 of 2011. The Gujarat Government Gazette [Internet]. Gujarat: Government of Gujarat; c2011 [cited 2014 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/6148/1/gaz.ex-iv-10_dt.11-4-2011vd.pdf.
  21. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Anatomy's use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clin Anat 2012;25:246-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21223
  22. Bogh L, Madsen M. Attitudes, knowledge, and proficiency in relation to organ donation: a questionnaire-based analysis in donor hospitals in northern Denmark. Transplant Proc 2005;37:3256-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.063
  23. Winkelmann A, Guldner FH. Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand. BMJ 2004;329:1455-7. Erratum in: BMJ 2005;330:82. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1455
  24. Park JT, Jang Y, Park MS, Pae C, Park J, Hu KS, Park JS, Han SH, Koh KS, Kim HJ. The trend of body donation for education based on Korean social and religious culture. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:33-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.198
  25. Sehirli US, Saka E, Sarikaya O. Attitudes of Turkish anatomists toward cadaver donation. Clin Anat 2004;17:677-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20056
  26. Conesa C, Rios A, Ramirez P, del Mar Rodriguez M, Rivas P, Parrilla P. Socio-personal factors influencing public attitude towards living donation in south-eastern Spain. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:2874-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh466
  27. Karau PB, Wamachi A, Ndede K, Mwamisi J, Ndege P. Perception to cadaver dissection and views on anatomy as a subject between two pioneer cohorts in a Kenyan Medical School. Anat J Afr 2014;3:318-23.
  28. Manzanares-Cespedes MC, Dalmau-Pastor M, Simon de Blas C, Vazquez-Osorio MT. Body donation, teaching, and research in dissection rooms in Spain in times of COVID-19. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14:562-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2093
  29. Park HJ, Ahn H, Ki E, Lee JS, Choi Y, Hu KS, Chun YM, Kim HJ. Body donation trends in Yonsei University: a statistical analysis of donor records. Anat Cell Biol 2021;54:59-64.  https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.20.261