Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of FSSC 22000 Food Safety Management System Characteristics on Business Performance: Mediating Effects of Organizational Capabilities

FSSC 22000 식품안전 경영시스템 특성이 기업 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 조직역량의 매개효과를 중심으로

  • Gong, Wonjoo (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School, Soongsil University) ;
  • Yoo, Hanjoo (Department of Business Administration, Soongsil University)
  • 공원주 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 유한주 (숭실대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2023.05.15
  • Accepted : 2023.05.26
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the impact of FSSC 22000 food safety management system characteristics on the business performance of food-related companies and to verify the mediating effect of organizational capabilities in the relationship between them. Methods: To achieve this, a survey was conducted among employees of food companies in Seoul and the metropolitan area that have implemented the FSSC 22000 food safety management system, and the following main results were derived. Results: First, the FSSC food safety management system factors, such as measurement/analysis and improve- ment, documentation, management responsibility, and service and product realization, were found to have a significant positive (+) impact on organizational capabilities. The relative impact was in the order of measurement/analysis and improvement, documentation, management responsibility, and service and product realization. Second, organizational capabilities were found to have a significant positive (+) impact on business performance. Third, the FSSC food safety management system factors, such as measurement/analysis and improvement, management responsibility, resource management, and documentation, were found to have a significant positive (+) impact on business performance. The relative impact was in the order of measure- ment/analysis and improvement, management responsibility, resource management, and documentation. Fourth, the factors of management responsibility, resource management, measurement/analysis and improvement, and documentation, excluding resource management factors, were found to have a positive impact on business performance through the mediation of organizational capabilities. Conclusion: The results of this study may provide important implications for the implementation and efficient operation and management of the FSSC 22000 food safety management system in enhancing the business performance of food-related companies.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, G. C. 2015. The Effect of Organizational Capability and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies 29(3):25-41. https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2015.29.3.25
  2. Baurina, S. B. & Amirova, R. I. 2021. FSSC 22000 certification as a food security tool. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 666(3):32-60.
  3. Bomba, M. Y. & Susol, N. Y. 2020. Main requirements for food safety management systems under international standards: BRС, IFS, FSSC 22000, ISO 22000, Global GAP, SQF. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Food Technologies 22(93):18-25.
  4. Burgelman, R., Christensen, C., and Wheelwright, S. 2009. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Chae, J. S. & Kim, C. J. 2019. The impact of strategic human resource management on management performance through organizational competence. Journal of Human Resource Management Research 23(23):143-174.
  6. Cho, I. H. 2020. Measuring and Reporting Corporate Social Performance: An Exploratory Study for the Practical Application of the Double Bottom Line. Knowledge Management Research 21(2):1-19. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2020.21.2.001
  7. Cho, W. G. & Cho, C. B. 2009. A Study on the Effects of HACCP Practice Level of Food service Workers on Quality Effectiveness and Business Performance. Hotel Resort Research 8(1):39-57.
  8. Choi, S. H., Ham, T. S., & Lee, T. Y. 2018. A Study on the Effective Food Safety Information Provision Based on Health Belief Model. Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety 33(4):259-265. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2018.33.4.259
  9. Choi, Y. B. & Kim, H. N. 2022. The Influence of Restaurant Food Safety Awareness Reflected in Online Reviews on the Usefulness of Online Reviews. Hotel Resort Research 21(2):371-389.
  10. Food Safety Information Agency. 2021. Report on Consumer Reporting Trends for Adulterated and Defective Foods.
  11. Ha, S. K. & Yoon, B. S. 2019. Effect of Quality Management Activities on the Performance-Mediation Effect of Innovation Culture Moderated by Organizational Mindfulness Support. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 47(4):667-685.
  12. Han, T.Y. 2022. The Impact of Food Company Supply Chain Quality Management Implementation on Business Performance. PhD diss., Hanyang University.
  13. Harris, K. J., Ali, F., & Ryu, K. 2018. Foodborne illness outbreaks in restaurants and patrons' propensity to return. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30(3):1273-1292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2016-0672
  14. Jang, J. K., & Kim, S. K. 2021. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Financial Performance in Public Institutions. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 49(3): 393-404.
  15. Joo, B. G., & Kang, C. H. 2011. Current Status of Food Safety Management System in Korea. Food Science and Industry 44(2): 2-8.
  16. Kim, C. B. & Kim, G. H. 2013. A Study on the Relationship between the Introduction of HACCP in the Korean Food Industry and the Traceability, Transparency, Information Sharing, and Business Performance of the Supply Chain. Journal of Trade Information Studies 15(4):47-68.
  17. Kim, C. B. 2013. An Empirical Study on the causal relation of Partnerships, HACCP Management, Food Quality Management, Customer Relationship Management and Performance in Food Industry. e-Business Research 14(5):131-151.
  18. Kim, J. S., Seo, S. T., & Kim, S. W. 2022. The Impact of Consumption Capability and Food Safety Awareness on Origin Interest. Journal of Rural Economics 45(1):39-62.
  19. Kim, K. J. 2022. Food Safety Perception, Risk Perception, and Additional Payment Intention for Safe Food among Korean and Chinese Consumers. Journal of Consumer Studies 33(3):19-39. https://doi.org/10.35736/JCS.33.3.2
  20. Kim, S. M. 2014. A Study on the Impact of BSC Learning and Growth Perspective on Quality Management System and Business Performance. PhD diss., Dong-A University Graduate School.
  21. Kim, Y. J., Park, S. H., & Oh, S. H. 2020. The Influence of Entrepreneurial Morality on Financial and Social Performance through Entrepreneurship and Social Responsibility. Journal of Information Systems Research 29(1):137-158. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2020.29.1.137
  22. Kim, Y. S. & Suk, H. S. 2017. An Empirical Study on the Effect of International Standards Management System Integration on Business Performance-Focused on Quality, Environment and Health & safety management system. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 45(4):781-809. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2017.45.4.781
  23. Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York.
  24. Lawson, B. & Samson, D. 2001. Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 5(03):377-400. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919601000427
  25. Lee, H.J. & Oh, I.H. 2022. Mediating Effect of Self-Leadership of Organizational Members on the Relationships Between Quality Management System and Business Performance -Focusing on Health Functional Food Companies-. Journal of Korean Contents Society 22(11):620-635. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2022.22.11.620
  26. Lim, W.B. 2019. The Impact of Non-financial Information on Business Performance: Focusing on ESG Score. International Accounting Research 86:119-144.
  27. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2022. MFDS strengthens management to prevent foreign matter contamination in food. Press Release (2022.06.28.).
  28. Mortimore, S. & Wallace, C. 2013. HACCP: A practical approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
  29. Park, S. H. 2011. The Impact of ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS) Factors on Business Performance. PhD diss., Daegu Catholic University Graduate School.
  30. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36:717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  31. Rosak-Szyrocka, J. & Abbase, A. A. 2020. Quality management and safety of food in HACCP system aspect. Production Engineering Archives 26(2):50-53. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.11
  32. Ryu, K., Park, K. H., Yang, J. Y., & Bahk, G. J. 2013. Simple approach in HACCP for evaluating the risk level of hazards using probability distributions. Food Control 30(2):459-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.042
  33. Ryu, T. M., Kim, K. S., & Jeong, D. S. 2013. The Impact of Business Environment and Organizational Culture on HACCP Management Innovation and Business Performance. Journal of Human Resource Management Research 20(3):301-316.
  34. Saefullah, M., Apriamy, Y., & Juwita, J. 2023. Implementasi FSSC 22000 sebagai modal keunggulan bersaing perusahaan TVP dalam beretika bisnis. Jurnal Bina Bangsa Ekonomika 16(1):43-49.
  35. Selznick, P. 1984. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  36. Shim, N. Y. 2017. The Impact of Quality Management System on Business Performance: Focusing on Organizational Capability and Customer Satisfaction. PhD diss., Dongmyung University Graduate School.
  37. Street, R. 2015. Particularities of FSSC 22000-food safety management system. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 16(1):274-279.
  38. Won, J. H. & Lee, J. H. 2019. The Impact of Corporate Shared Value Creation Activities on Non-financial Business Performance. Management Research 34(4):161-194.