참고문헌
- Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr.Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6S):S79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
- Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x
- Lingaraj K, Teo YH, Bergman N. The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1555-60. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22517
- Berasi CC 4th, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV Jr. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:528-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3969-z
- Migaud H, Common H, Girard J, Huten D, Putman S. Acetabular reconstruction using porous metallic material in complex revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1S):S53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.030
- Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11 Supple A):36-42. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34455
- Ahmad SS, Hoos L, Perka C, Stockle U, Braun KF, Konrads C. Follow-up definitions in clinical orthopaedic research: a systematic review. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2:344-50. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.25.BJO-2021-0007.R1
- DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:835-40. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00313
- Joshi AB, Lee J, Christensen C. Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:643-8. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32106
- Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:428-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2126-1
- Russell SP, O'Neill CJ, Fahey EJ, Guerin S, Gul R, Harty JA. Trabecular metal augments for severe acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:1740-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.033
- Molicnik A, Hanc M, Recnik G, Krajnc Z, Rupreht M, Fokter SK. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:911-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1354-3
- Meneghini RM, Meyer C, Buckley CA, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Mechanical stability of novel highly porous metal acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:337-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.003
- Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30608
- Goodman GP, Engh CA Jr. The custom triflange cup: build it and they will come. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):68-72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B.36354
- Melnic CM, Knedel M, Courtney PM, Sheth NP, Paprosky WG. The dome technique, an option for massive anterosuperior medial acetabular bone loss: a retrospective case series. HSS J. 2020;16(Suppl 2):521-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09730-x
- Moore MS, McAuley JP, Young AM, Engh CA Sr. Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:176-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000201149.14078.50
- Baauw M, van Hellemondt GG, van Hooff ML, Spruit M. The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:780-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35129
- Jain S, Grogan RJ, Giannoudis PV. Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review. Hip Int. 2014;24:109-22. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000101
- Rossmann M, Ansorge C, Lausmann C, Suero EM, Gehrke T, Citak M. An alternative treatment option for Paprosky Type IIIb acetabular defect using multiple tantalum wedges - a case report. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:70-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.10.015
- Ansorge CH, Ohlmeier M, Ballhause TM, Gehrke T, Citak M, Lee M. Acetabular reconstruction using multiple porous tantalum augments: three-quarter football augment. Case Rep Orthop. 2022;2022:7954052. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7954052
- Baauw M, van Hooff ML, Spruit M. Current construct options for revision of large acetabular defects: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2016;4:e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00119
- Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3304-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1395-4
- Weeden SH, Schmidt RH. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):151-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.024
- Flecher X, Sporer S, Paprosky W. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:949-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.019
- Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:862-7. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200106000-00007
- Grace TR, Goh GS, Lee GC, Kamath AF, Kurtz SM, Courtney PM. Dual mobility reduces dislocations-why I use it in all revisions. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(7S):S63-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.005