DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Periprosthetic Occult Femoral Fracture: An Unknown Side Effect of Press-Fit Fixation in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Ho Hyun Yun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VHS Medical Center) ;
  • Woo Seung Lee (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VHS Medical Center) ;
  • Young Bin Shin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VHS Medical Center) ;
  • Tae Hyuck Yoon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VHS Medical Center)
  • Received : 2022.09.09
  • Accepted : 2023.01.30
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence and risk factors for development of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures during primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to assess the clinical consequences of these fractures. Materials and Methods: A total of 199 hips were examined. Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were defined as fractures not detected intraoperatively and on postoperative radiographs, but only observed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Clinical, surgical, and radiographic analysis of variables was performed for identification of risk factors for periprosthetic occult femoral fractures. A comparison of stem subsidence, stem alignment, and thigh pain between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group was also performed. Results: Periprosthetic occult femoral fractures were detected during the operation in 21 (10.6%) of 199 hips. Of eight hips with periprosthetic occult femoral fractures that were detected around the lesser trochanter, concurrent periprosthetic occult femoral fractures located at different levels were detected in six hips (75.0%). Only the female sex showed significant association with an increased risk of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures (odds ratio for males, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.01; P=0.04). A significant difference in the incidence of thigh pain was observed between the occult fracture group and the non-fracture group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Occurrence of periprosthetic occult femoral fractures is relatively common during primary THA using tapered wedge stems. We recommend CT referral for female patients who report unexplained early postoperative thigh pain or developed periprosthetic intraoperative femoral fractures around the lesser trochanter during primary THA using tapered wedge stems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Young Lee for providing technical assistance with the statistical analysis in this study.

References

  1. Blankstein M, Lentine B, Nelms NJ. The use of cement in hip arthroplasty: a contemporary perspective. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:e586-94. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00604 
  2. Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N, Malchau H. A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2052-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7 
  3. Bunyoz KI, Malchau E, Malchau H, Troelsen A. Has the use of fixation techniques in THA changed in this decade? The uncemented paradox revisited. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:697-704. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001117 
  4. Liu B, Ma W, Li H, Wu T, Huo J, Han Y. Incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a single stem: a retrospective study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1400-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031 
  5. Hasegawa K, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Inoue D, Tsuchiya H. Periprosthetic occult fractures of the acetabulum occur frequently during primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:484-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5138-z 
  6. Dammerer D, Putzer D, Glodny B, et al. Occult intra-operative periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum may affect implant survival. Int Orthop. 2019;43:1583-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4084-7 
  7. Gomez-Barrena E. CORR Insights®: periprosthetic occult fractures of the acetabulum occur frequently during primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:495-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5208-2 
  8. Yun HH, Lim JT, Yang SH, Park PS. Occult periprosthetic femoral fractures occur frequently during a long, trapezoidal, double-tapered cementless femoral stem fixation in primary THA. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0221731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221731 
  9. Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T, Ozaki Y, Matsumoto M, Kaneko K. Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, taperedwedge stem? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1524-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.016 
  10. Cooper HJ, Jacob AP, Rodriguez JA. Distal fixation of proximally coated tapered stems may predispose to a failure of osteointegration. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(6 Suppl):78-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.003 
  11. Yun HH, Yoon JR, Yang JH, Song SY, Park SB, Lee JW. A validation study for estimation of femoral anteversion using the posterior lesser trochanter line: an analysis of computed tomography measurement. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1776-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.023 
  12. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540-52. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0921 
  13. Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J, Chambers I. Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop. 2016;13:322-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.026 
  14. Khalily C, Lester DK. Results of a tapered cementless femoral stem implanted in varus. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:463-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32171 
  15. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2 
  16. Nash W, Harris A. The Dorr type and cortical thickness index of the proximal femur for predicting peri-operative complications during hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22:92-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901402200123 
  17. Schiessel A, Zweymuller K. The nutrient artery canal of the femur: a radiological study in patients with primary total hip replacement. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:142-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-003-0728-8 
  18. Imre N, Battal B, Acikel CH, Akgun V, Comert A, Yazar F. The demonstration of the number, course, and the location of nutrient artery canals of the femur by multidetector computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34:427-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0930-7 
  19. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Naughton M. Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: a new fracture pattern is described. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3137-x 
  20. Barrack RL, Paprosky W, Butler RA, Palafox A, Szuszczewicz E, Myers L. Patients' perception of pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:590-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2000.6634 
  21. Della Valle CJ, Momberger NG, Paprosky WG. Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:281-90. 
  22. Schwartz JT Jr, Mayer JG, Engh CA. Femoral fracture during non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1135-42. 
  23. Reddy AVG, Eachempati KK, Mugalur A, Suchinder A, Rao VBNP, Kamurukuru N. Undisplaced intraoperative fracture presenting as early dislocation with tapered wedge stems in total hip arthroplasty - case series and review of literature. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7:31-4. 
  24. Yeung Y, Chiu KY, Yau WP, Tang WM, Cheung WY, Ng TP. Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph-can it predict the bone quality? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.037 
  25. Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:1163-71; discussion 1172-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.04.018 
  26. Melvin JS, Karthikeyan T, Cope R, Fehring TK. Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1285-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.024 
  27. Jo WL, Lee YK, Ha YC, Park MS, Lyu SH, Koo KH. Frequency, developing time, intensity, duration, and functional score of thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1279-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.016 
  28. Ha YC, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Kim HJ. Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.169 
  29. Malekmotiei L, Farahmand F, Shodja HM, Samadi-Dooki A. An analytical approach to study the intraoperative fractures of femoral shaft during total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135:041004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023699