Clinical Endoscopy

The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (대한소화기내시경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Safety and feasibility of opening window fistulotomy as a new precutting technique for primary biliary access in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

  • Yasuhiro Kuraishi (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Kazuo Hara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Shin Haba (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Takamichi Kuwahara (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Nozomi Okuno (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Takafumi Yanaidani (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Sho Ishikawa (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Tsukasa Yasuda (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Masanori Yamada (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Nobumasa Mizuno (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.04.15
  • Accepted : 2022.06.30
  • Published : 2023.07.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background/Aims: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. To prevent this event, a unique precutting method, termed opening window fistulotomy, was performed in patients with a large infundibulum as the primary procedure for biliary cannulation, whereby a suprapapillary laid-down H-shaped incision was made without touching the orifice. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of this novel technique. Methods: One hundred and ten patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients with a papillary roof size ≥10 mm underwent opening window fistulotomy for primary biliary access. In addition, the incidence of complications and success rate of biliary cannulation were evaluated. Results: The median size of the papillary roof was 6 mm (range, 3-20 mm). Opening window fistulotomy was performed in 30 patients (27.3%), none of whom displayed PEP. Duodenal perforation was recorded in one patient (3.3%), which was resolved by conservative treatment. The cannulation rate was high (96.7%, 29/30 patients). The median duration of biliary access was 8 minutes (range, 3-15 minutes). Conclusions: Opening window fistulotomy demonstrated its feasibility for primary biliary access by achieving great safety with no PEP complications and a high success rate for biliary cannulation.

Keywords

References

  1. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008;40:296-301. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-995566
  2. Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02463-0
  3. Larkin CJ, Huibregtse K. Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2001;3:147-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-001-0012-9
  4. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy?: results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821-829. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.097543
  5. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:139-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00380.x
  6. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline: updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014;46:799-815. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1377875
  7. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425-434. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.117550
  8. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70121-X
  9. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003;35:830-834. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-42614
  10. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x
  11. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1753-1761. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.136
  12. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:31-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2008.5
  13. Kaffes AJ, Sriram PV, Rao GV, et al. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:669-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.022
  14. Mariani A, Di Leo M, Giardullo N, et al. Early precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary access to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2016;48:530-535. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-102250
  15. Testoni PA, Giussani A, Vailati C, et al. Precut sphincterotomy, repeated cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with bile duct stone disease. Dig Liver Dis 2011;43:792-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.05.010
  16. Choudhary A, Winn J, Siddique S, et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:4093-4101. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4093
  17. Jang SI, Kim DU, Cho JH, et al. Primary needle-knife fistulotomy versus conventional cannulation method in a high-risk cohort of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115:616-624. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000480
  18. Jin YJ, Jeong S, Lee DH. Utility of needle-knife fistulotomy as an initial method of biliary cannulation to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in a highly selected at-risk group: a single-arm prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84:808-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.011
  19. Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:334-339. https://doi.org/10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98593
  20. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2
  21. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
  22. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1068-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(91)90735-4