Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제56권4호
  • /
  • Pages.446-452
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Yousaf Zafar (Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center) ;
  • Ahmed Mustafa Rashid (Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University) ;
  • Syed Sarmad Javaid (Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University) ;
  • Ahmed Kamal Siddiqi (Department of Medicine, Ziauddin Medical University) ;
  • Adnan Zafar (Department of Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical College) ;
  • Arsalan Zafar Iqbal (Department of Medicine, FMH Lahore Medical College) ;
  • Jagpal Singh Klair (Department of Gastroenterology, Kiaser Permanente) ;
  • Rajesh Krishnamoorthi (Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.18
  • 심사 : 2023.02.26
  • 발행 : 2023.07.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Colonoscopy for screening is associated with unpleasant experiences for patients, and abdominal compression devices have been developed to minimize these problems. However, there is a paucity of data supporting the therapeutic benefits of this strategy. This study examined the effects of using an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on the cecal intubation time (CIT), abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural changes. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus (from inception to November 2021) for randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of an abdominal compression device during colonoscopy on CIT, abdominal compression, patient comfort, and postural change. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Results: Our pooled analysis of seven randomized controlled trials revealed that abdominal compression devices significantly reduced CIT (WMD, -0.76 [-1.49 to -0.03] minutes; p=0.04), abdominal compression (OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.94; p=0.03), and postural changes (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; p=0.004) during colonoscopy. However, our results did not show a significant change in patient comfort (WMD, -0.48; 95% CI, -1.05 to 0.08; p=0.09) when using an abdominal compression device. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that employing an abdominal compression device may reduce CIT, abdominal compression, and postural change but have no impact on patient comfort.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298-1306.
  2. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, et al. Trainee participation during colonoscopy adversely affects polyp and adenoma detection rates. Digestion 2011;84:245-246.
  3. Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1171-1178.
  4. Ansa BE, Coughlin SS, Alema-Mensah E, et al. Evaluation of colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States (2000-2014). J Clin Med 2018;7:22.
  5. Crockett SD, Cirri HO, Kelapure R, et al. Use of an abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:850-857.
  6. Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Higuchi H, et al. Effects of encircled abdominal compression device in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2019;9:11.
  7. Ozkan ZK, Findik uY, Albayrak D. The impact of wearing an abdominal corset to achieve compression on colonoscopy outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Gastrointest Nurs 2021;19(Sup2):S18-S23.
  8. Prechel JA, Young CJ, Hucke R, et al. The importance of abdominal pressure during colonoscopy: techniques to assist the physician and to minimize injury to the patient and assistant. Gastroenterol Nurs 2005;28:232-236.
  9. Rothman JP, Gunnarsson U, Bisgaard T. Abdominal binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Dan Med J 2014;61:A4941.
  10. Goksoy B, Kiyak M. The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021;56:990-997.
  11. Toros AB, Ersoz F, Ozcan O. Does a fitted abdominal corset makes colonoscopy more tolerable? Dig Endosc 2012;24:164-167.
  12. Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Sakitani K, et al. Colonoscopy using back brace support belt: a randomized, prospective trial. JGH Open 2019;4:441-445.
  13. Tsutsumi S, Fukushima H, Kuwano H. Colonoscopy using an abdominal bandage. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:1983-1984.
  14. Yu GQ, Huang XM, Li HY, et al. Use of an abdominal obstetric binder in colonoscopy: a randomized, prospective trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33:1365-1369.
  15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1-e34.
  16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
  17. von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, et al. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:574-580.
  18. Franco DL, Leighton JA, Gurudu SR. Approach to incomplete colonoscopy: new techniques and technologies. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 2017;13:476-483.
  19. Runge T, Eluri S, Cirri H, et al. The effect of provider experience on efficacy of ColoWrap use during colonoscopy: results from a randomized-controlled trial: 1579. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:S681.