DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

  • Tadayuki Takagi (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Mitsuru Sugimoto (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Hidemichi Imamura (Department of Gastroenterology, Ohtanishinouchi Hospital) ;
  • Yosuke Takahata (Department of Gastroenterology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Yuki Nakajima (Department of Gastroenterology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Rei Suzuki (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Naoki Konno (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Hiroyuki Asama (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Yuki Sato (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Hiroki Irie (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Jun Nakamura (Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Mika Takasumi (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Minami Hashimoto (Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Tsunetaka Kato (Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Ryoichiro Kobashi (Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Yuko Hashimoto (Department of Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Goro Shibukawa (Department of Gastroenterology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Shigeru Marubashi (Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University) ;
  • Takuto Hikichi (Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital) ;
  • Hiromasa Ohira (Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University)
  • Received : 2021.12.01
  • Accepted : 2022.02.22
  • Published : 2023.01.30

Abstract

Background/Aims: Immune checkpoint blockade has recently been reported to be effective in treating microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors. Therefore, sufficient sampling of histological specimens is necessary in cases of unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC). This multicenter study investigated the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a Franseen needle for MSI evaluation in patients with UR-PC. Methods: A total of 89 patients with UR-PC who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or EUS-FNB using 22-G needles at three hospitals in Japan (2018-2021) were enrolled. Fifty-six of these patients (FNB 23 and FNA 33) were followed up or evaluated for MSI. Patient characteristics, UR-PC data, and procedural outcomes were compared between patients who underwent EUS-FNB and those who underwent EUS-FNA. Results: No significant difference in terms of sufficient tissue acquisition for histology was observed between patients who underwent EUS-FNB and those who underwent EUS-FNA. MSI evaluation was possible significantly more with tissue samples obtained using EUS-FNB than with tissue samples obtained using EUS-FNA (82.6% [19/23] vs. 45.5% [15/33], respectively; p<0.01). In the multivariate analysis, EUS-FNB was the only significant factor influencing the possibility of MSI evaluation. Conclusions: EUS-FNB using a Franseen needle is desirable for ensuring sufficient tissue acquisition for MSI evaluation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank all the staff at the Department of Gastroenterology of Fukushima Medical University (Ohtanishinouchi Hospital and Aizu Medical Center), the Department of Endoscopy of Fukushima Medical University Hospital, and the gastroenterology ward of the Fukushima Medical University Hospital.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7-30.
  2. Stathis A, Moore MJ. Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010;7:163-172.
  3. Warsame R, Grothey A. Treatment options for advanced pancreatic cancer: a review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2012;12:1327-1336.
  4. Fogel EL, Shahda S, Sandrasegaran K, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to pancreas cancer in 2016: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:537-554.
  5. Sohal DPS, Kennedy EB, Cinar P, et al. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:3217-3230.
  6. Okusaka T, Furuse J. Recent advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: evidence from Japan and recommendations in guidelines. J Gastroenterol 2020;55:369-382.
  7. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut 1999;44:720-726.
  8. Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc 2011;23 Suppl 1:29-33.
  9. Uehara H, Ikezawa K, Kawada N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic malignancy in relation to the size of lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:1256-1261.
  10. Mukai S, Itoi T, Yamaguchi H, et al. A retrospective histological comparison of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel Franseen needle and a conventional end-cut type needle. Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:50-57.
  11. Sugiura R, Kuwatani M, Yane K, et al. Prospective, multicenter, observational study of tissue acquisition through EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a 25G Franseen needle. Endosc Ultrasound 2019;8:321-328.
  12. Sugimoto M, Irie H, Takagi T, et al. Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions. BMC Cancer 2020;20:1094.
  13. Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid onsite cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol 2009;44:322-328.
  14. Suzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Dig Endosc 2012;24:452-456.
  15. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1035-1046.
  16. Japan Pancreas Society. General rules for the study of pancreatic cancer. 7th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd; 2016.
  17. Yamamoto H, Itoh F, Nakamura H, et al. Genetic and clinical features of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with widespread microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 2001;61:3139-3144.
  18. Murphy KM, Zhang S, Geiger T, et al. Comparison of the microsatellite instability analysis system and the Bethesda panel for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers. J Mol Diagn 2006;8:305-311.
  19. Kurata K, Kubo M, Kai M, et al. Microsatellite instability in Japanese female patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2020;27:490-498.
  20. Bando H, Okamoto W, Fukui T, et al. Utility of the quasi-monomorphic variation range in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Sci 2018;109:3411-3415.
  21. Patil DT, Bronner MP, Portier BP, et al. A five-marker panel in a multiplex PCR accurately detects microsatellite instability-high colorectal tumors without control DNA. Diagn Mol Pathol 2012;21:127-133.
  22. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48:452-458.
  23. Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, et al. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline-March 2017. Endoscopy 2017;49:989-1006.
  24. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade. Science 2017;357:409-413.
  25. Luchini C, Grant RC, Scarpa A, et al. Microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic cancers: the same or different? Gut 2021;70:1809-1811.
  26. Singhi AD, George B, Greenbowe JR, et al. Real-time targeted genome profile analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas identifies genetic alterations that might be targeted with existing drugs or used as biomarkers. Gastroenterology 2019;156:2242-2253.
  27. Kamatham S, Shahjehan F, Kasi PM. Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of microsatellite instability and response to immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:23.
  28. Obayashi M, Shibasaki Y, Koakutsu T, et al. Pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells curatively resected after pembrolizumab therapy for lung metastases: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 2020;20:220.