Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Oblique Axis Hypothenar Free Flaps: Tips for Harvesting Larger Flaps with Minimal Donor Site Morbidity

  • Sang Ho Oh (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saeson Hospital) ;
  • Jae In Chung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Saeson Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.07.22
  • Accepted : 2022.12.28
  • Published : 2023.05.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Hypothenar free flaps (HTFFs) have been widely used for reconstructing palmar defects. Although previous anatomical and clinical studies of HTFF have been conducted, this technique still has some limitations. In this study, we describe some tips for large flap design that allows for easy harvesting of HTFFs with minimal donor site morbidity. Methods A total of 14 HTFF for hand defect reconstruction were recorded. The oblique flap was designed in the proximal HT area following relaxed skin tension line along the axis between fourth web space and 10 mm ulnar side of pisiform. A flap pedicle includes one or two perforators with ulnar digital artery and HT branch of basilic vein. In addition, innervated HTFF can be harvested with a branch of ulnar digital nerve. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain data on patients' information, operative details, and follow-up period. In addition, surgical outcome score was obtained from the patient, up to 10 points, at the last follow-up. Results Mean harvest time was 46 minutes, and two perforators were included in 10 cases. The mean flap area was 10.84 cm2. There were no problems such as donor site depression, scar contracture, keloids, wound dehiscence, numbness or neuroma pain at donor sites, and hypersensitivity or cold intolerance at flap site, either functionally or aesthetically. Conclusion Palmar defect reconstruction is challenging for hand surgeons. However, large HTFF can be harvested without complications using the oblique axis HTFF technique. We believe our surgical tips increase utility of HTFF for palmar defect reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Omokawa S, Yajima H, Inada Y, Fukui A, Tamai S. A reverse ulnar hypothenar flap for finger reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(04):828-833 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009020-00012
  2. Schenck RR, Cheema TA. Hypothenar skin grafts for fingertip reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9(05):750-753 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80029-5
  3. Omokawa S, Ryu J, Tang JB, Han JS. Anatomical basis for a fasciocutaneous flap from the hypothenar eminence of the hand. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49(08):559-563 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90134-4
  4. Koshima I, Urushibara K, Fukuda N, et al. Digital artery perforator flaps for fingertip reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(07):1579-1584 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000232987.54881.a7
  5. Hwang K, Han JY, Chung IH. Hypothenar flap based on a cutaneous perforator branch of the ulnar artery: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2005;21(05):297-301 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-871770
  6. Uchida R, Matsumura H, Imai R, Tanaka K, Watanabe K. Anatomical study of the perforators from the ulnar palmar digital artery of the little finger and clinical uses of digital artery perforator flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009;43(02):90-93 https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310802556976
  7. Han HH, Choi YS, Kim IB, Kim SH, Jun YJ. A perforator from the ulnar artery and cutaneous nerve of the hypothenar area: an anatomical study for clinical application. Microsurgery 2017;37(01):49-56 https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22463
  8. Kim KS, Kim ES, Hwang JH, Lee SY. Fingertip reconstruction using the hypothenar perforator free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66(09):1263-1270 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.006
  9. Yamamoto T, Daniel BW, Kageyama T, et al. Expanding indication of free hypothenar flap transfer: sequential pedicled ulnar palm flap transfer to a relatively large hypothenar flap donor site. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75(01):332-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.08.021
  10. Pak CS, Jeon JI, Myung Y, et al. Palmar ulnar artery perforator free flap for fingertip reconstruction: anatomical and clinical study. BioMed Res Int 2018;2018:2862879
  11. Kodaira S, Fukumoto K. Use of distal hypothenar perforator free flaps for pulp defects. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2020;25(01):20-25 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835520500022
  12. Lee DC, Kim JS, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW, Chung KC. Partial second toe pulp free flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121(03):899-907 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000299945.03655.0d
  13. Chen QZ, Sun YC, Chen J, Kong J, Gong YP, Mao T. Comparative study of functional and aesthetically outcomes of reverse digital artery and reverse dorsal homodigital island flaps for fingertip repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015;40(09):935-943 https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415579300
  14. Yang JW, Kim JS, Lee DC, et al. The radial artery superficial palmar branch flap: a modified free thenar flap with constant innervation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26(08):529-538 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262953
  15. Yildirim S, Avci G, Akan M, Akoz T. Complications of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2002;48(06):586-592 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200206000-00004
  16. Eaton RG. The digital neurovascular bundle. A microanatomic study of its contents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;61(61):176-185 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-196811000-00018