DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Applications of the Intercostal Artery Perforator Flap for Trunk Reconstruction

  • Young Jun Kim (Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo Young Choi (Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ji Seon Cheon (Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine) ;
  • Min Hyub Choi (Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.11.02
  • Accepted : 2023.03.03
  • Published : 2023.05.15

Abstract

Background Trunk defects can occur because of surgical site infections after spinal surgery, resection of malignant tumors, or trauma. Herein, we present our experience of using intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps to reconstruct trunk defects without noteworthy complications. Fourteen patients underwent reconstruction with ICAP flaps between March 2015 and March 2019. Methods Patients' data, including age, sex, the cause of the defect, defect size, perforator location, flap size, complications, and follow-up period, were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 56.5 years (range, 19-80 years). All operations were performed after the results of bacterial culture from the wound showed no microbial growth. We found reliable perforators around the defect using Doppler ultrasonography. The perforator flaps were elevated with a pulsatile perforator and rotated in a propeller fashion to the defects. We performed five dorsal and two lateral ICAP flaps. The mean flap dimensions were 12 × 5.5 cm2 (range, 6 × 5 to 18 × 8 cm2). Results Primary closure of the donor site was performed. Marginal congestion was observed as a complication in one case, but it healed with no need for revision. The mean follow-up period was 8 months. All patients were satisfied with the surgical outcomes. Conclusion ICAP flaps can be easily mobilized, thereby reducing donor site morbidity without sacrificing the underlying muscles for trunk reconstruction. Therefore, these flaps are useful options for the reconstruction of trunk defects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Min Choi, Dong Seok Shin, Jun Mo Kim, and Hyun Jung for their contributions to comments for this article. This study was supported by research fund from the Chosun University, 2022.

References

  1. Mathes DW, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ. Management of posterior trunk defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(03):73e-83e https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000233130.93861.15
  2. Park SW, Oh TS, Eom JS, Sun YC, Suh HS, Hong JP. Freestyle multiple propeller flap reconstruction (jigsaw puzzle approach) for complicated back defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015;31(04):261-267 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395994
  3. Kerrigan CL, Daniel RK. The intercostal flap: an anatomical and hemodynamic approach. Ann Plast Surg 1979;2(05):411-421 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-197905000-00008
  4. Hamdi M, Spano A, Landuyt KV, D'Herde K, Blondeel P, Monstrey S. The lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and clinical application in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121(02):389-396 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000298317.65296.cf
  5. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, de Frene B, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S. The versatility of the inter-costal artery perforator (ICAP) flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59(06):644-652 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.006
  6. Atik B, Tan O, Mutaf M, Senel B, Yilmaz N, Kiymaz N. Skin perforators of back region: anatomical study and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 2008;60(01):70-75 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000263452.23901.ba
  7. Dibbell DG. Use of a long island flap to bring sensation to the sacral area in young paraplegics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974;54(02):220-223 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197408000-00025
  8. Wong MC, Allison K, Yap LH, Peart F. The pedicled intercostal neurovascular island skin flap for lumbosacral trunk reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57(06):520-524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.002
  9. Elzawawy EM, Kelada MN. Posterior intercostal flap: an anatomical study and best flap design. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20(01):244
  10. Wei FC, Mardini S. Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(04):910-916 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000133171.65075.81
  11. Minabe T, Harii K. Dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap: anatomical study and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(03):681-689 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000270309.33069.e5
  12. de Weerd L, Weum S. The sensate medial dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap for closure of cervicothoracic midline defects after spinal surgery: an anatomic study and case reports. Ann Plast Surg 2009;63(04):418-421
  13. Hong JP. Reconstruction of the diabetic foot using the anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(05):1599-1608 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000207057.16292.8f
  14. John HE, Niumsawatt V, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS. Clinical applications of dynamic infrared thermography in plastic surgery: a systematic review. Gland Surg 2016;5(02):122-132