농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)

  • 제29권2호
  • /
  • Pages.23-34
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-8857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9493(eISSN)
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society of Rural Planning)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계층화분석(AHP)을 통한 농업인 가공창업 활성화 방안 연구 - 농업인 소규모 창업기술지원 사업을 중심으로 -

Research on Ways to Activating farmers' Processing Startups through Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) - Focusing on Small-scale Start-up Technology Support Project for Farmers -

  • 마지영 (우석대학교 산학협력중점) ;
  • 장동헌 (전북대학교 농경제유통학부(농업과학기술연구소)) ;
  • 문수희 (농촌진흥청 농산업경영과)
  • Ma, Ji-Young (Industry-University Cooperation, Woosuk University) ;
  • Jang, Dong-Heon (Division of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing(IAST), Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Moon, Soo-Hee (Farm & Agribusiness Management Division, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.09
  • 심사 : 2023.03.21
  • 발행 : 2023.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study used the AHP technique by constructing three classes based on small-scale start-up technology support projects for farmers to set the direction of revitalizing processed start-ups for farmers. To this end, priorities were derived by comparing the policy support managers of the Rural Development Administration and 18 people in charge of support projects for the Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services and the Urban Agricultural Technology Center. As a result, first, the priority for the direction of revitalizing processed start-ups for farmers was 45.9%, facility improvement 29.0%, and start-up technology support 25.1%. Second, the priority of processing technology support projects was 30.0%, processing technology standardization 28.6%, education and coaching 22.1%, intellectual property protection 19.3%, PR marketing 61.6%, online distribution 26.0%, and management start-up support 12.4%, and facility improvement support projects were 68.3% and internal facility remodeling 31.7%. Based on these results, efforts and revitalization measures for standardizing agricultural processing technology are needed, and active facility improvement support projects are urgently needed to establish a hygienic and safe production base.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, K. T., Cho, G. Y., Kang, H. S., 2003, Hierarchical decision-making by leading leaders, dhpub.
  2. Jang, S. Y., 2021, Agricultural Products Processing Center, The Korean Society of Food Preservation 20(2): 143-147.
  3. Jeong, S. O., Jang, D. H., 2020, Impact of Farmers' Sense of Community on Organizational Commitment and Business Performance:Focusing on Farmers Participating in the Agricultural Products Processing Center, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 26(1): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.26.1.2
  4. Jung, H. Y., Cho, Y. G., 2021, Policy research on the introduction of future basic income: Analysis to derive policy priorities, Ph.D. Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  5. Jang, Y. J., 2015, Small-scale food processing industry support ordinance enactment status and improvement tasks of farmers, National Assembly Research Service, Current issue report 255.
  6. Jang, Y. L., Yang, J. I., Hwan, D. Y., Kim, C. W., 2018, A Study on the Activation Plan of Local Agricultural Products Processing Center, Journal of Tourism Management Research 22(7):287-305. https://doi.org/10.18604/tmro.2018.22.7.14
  7. Ko, K. K., Ha, H. Y., 2008, Meta Analysis of the Utilization of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Policy Studies in Korea, The Korea Association for Policy Studies 17(1): 287-313.
  8. KOSTAT, A Survey on Farm Households. Each year.
  9. Ma, J. Y. 2023. Analysis on the Relation between Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Intention of Female Farmers, Ph.D. Dissertation, Jeonbuk National University.
  10. Park, G. Y., 2012, A study on development plans to citizen participatory : focus on relative importance and priorities based on AHP, Ph.D. Dissertation, Pai Chai University.
  11. Ramanujam, V., Saaty, T. L., 1981, Technological choice in the less developed countries: An analytic hierarchy preocess, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 19(1): 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(81)90050-0
  12. RDA., 2015, Rural Guidance Project Report.
  13. RDA., 2018, Rural Guidance Project Report.
  14. RDA., 2019, Rural Guidance Project Report.
  15. RDA., 2020a, Farmer Processing Entrepreneurship Education and Organization Manual.
  16. RDA., 2020b, Rural Guidance Project Report.
  17. Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  18. Saaty, T. L., 1990, How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research 48(1): 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  19. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., 2013, The Logic of Priorities: Applications in Business Energy, Health, and Transportation, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff. Reprinted in Paperback(1991), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1-358.
  20. Saaty. T. L., 1988, The Analytic Hierarchy process:planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill International Book Company.
  21. Satty, T. L., K. P. Kearns, 1985, Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems. Oxford: Pergamon.
  22. Vargas, L. G., 1990, An overview of the Analytic Hierarchy process and its applications, European journal of operational research 48(1): 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  23. Zahedi, F., 1986, The analytic hierarchy process a survey of the method and its applications, Interfaces 16(4): 96-108.  https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96