Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods

The Korean Statistical Society (한국통계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulation studies to compare bayesian wavelet shrinkage methods in aggregated functional data

  • Received : 2022.10.13
  • Accepted : 2023.02.21
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present work describes simulation studies to compare the performances in terms of averaged mean squared error of bayesian wavelet shrinkage methods in estimating component curves from aggregated functional data. Five bayesian methods available in the literature were considered to be compared in the studies: The shrinkage rule under logistic prior, shrinkage rule under beta prior, large posterior mode (LPM) method, amplitude-scale invariant Bayes estimator (ABE) and Bayesian adaptive multiresolution smoother (BAMS). The so called Donoho-Johnstone test functions, logit and SpaHet functions were considered as component functions and the scenarios were defined according to different values of sample size and signal to noise ratio in the datasets. It was observed that the signal to noise ratio of the data had impact on the performances of the methods. An application of the methodology and the results to the tecator dataset is also done.

Keywords

References

  1. Angelini C and Vidakovic B (2004). Gama-Minimax wavelet shrinkage: A robust incorporation of information about energy of a signal in denoising applications, Statistica Sinica, 14, 103-125.
  2. Bande MF and de la Fuente MO (2012). Statistical computing in functional data analysis: The R-package fda.usc., Journal of Statistical Software, 51, 1-28.
  3. Brereton RG (2003). Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
  4. Brown PJ, Vannucci M, and Fearn T (1998a). Bayesian wavelength selection in multicomponent analysis, Journal of Chemometrics, 12, 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199805/06)12:3<173::AID-CEM505>3.0.CO;2-0
  5. Brown PJ, Vannucci M, and Fearn T (1998b). Multivariate Bayesian variable selection and prediction, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 60, 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00144
  6. Brown PJ, Vannucci M, and Fearn T (2001). Bayesian wavelet regression on curves with application to a spectroscopic calibration problem, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753168118
  7. Cowe IA and McNicol JW (1985). The use of principal components in the analysis of near-infrared spectra, Applied Spectroscopy, 39, 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702854248944
  8. Cutillo L, Jung YY, Ruggeri F, and Vidakovic B (2008). Larger posterior mode wavelet thresholding and applications, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 138, 3758-3773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.12.015
  9. Dias R, Garcia NL, and Martarelli A (2009). Non-Parametric estimation for aggregated functional data for electric load monitoring, Environmetrics, 20, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.914
  10. Dias R, Garcia NL, and Schmidt A (2013). A hierarchical model for aggregated functional data, Technometrics, 55, 321.
  11. Donoho DL (1993a). Nonlinear wavelet methods of recovery for signals, densities, and spectra from indirect and noisy data, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, volume 47, American Mathematical Society, Providence: Rhode Island.
  12. Donoho DL (1993b). Unconditional bases are optimal bases for data compression and statistical estimation, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 1, 100-115. https://doi.org/10.1006/acha.1993.1008
  13. Donoho DL (1995a). De-Noising by soft-thresholding, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41, 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.382009
  14. Donoho DL (1995b). Nonlinear solution of linear inverse problems by wavelet-vaguelette decomposition, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2, 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1006/acha.1995.1008
  15. Donoho DL and Johnstone IM (1994a). Ideal denoising in an orthonormal basis chosen from a library of bases, Comptes Rendus-Academie des Sciences Paris Serie, 319, 1317-1322.
  16. Donoho DL and Johnstone IM, (1994b). Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika, 81, 425-455. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.425
  17. Donoho DL and Johnstone IM (1995). Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1200-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626
  18. Figueiredo MAT and Nowak RD (2001). Wavelet-Based image estimation: An empirical Bayes approach using Jeffrey's noninformative prior, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10, 1322-1331. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.941856
  19. Goepp V, Bouaziz O, and Nuel G (2018). Spline Regression with Automatic Knot Selection, Available from: arXiv: 1808.01770v1
  20. Ruppert D, Wand M, and Carroll RJ (2003). Semiparametric Regression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  21. Sousa ARS (2020). Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with logistic prior, Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 51, 4700-4714, Available from: http://doi:10.1080/03610918.2020.1747076
  22. Sousa ARS, Garcia NL, and Vidakovic B (2020). Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with beta prior, Computational Statistics, 36, 1341-1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-020-01048-1
  23. Sousa ARS (2022). A wavelet-based method in aggregated functional data analysis, arXiv preprint [stat.ME], Available from: arXiv:2205.15969v1
  24. Vidakovic B (1999). Statistical Modeling by Wavelets, Wiley, New York.
  25. Vidakovic B and Ruggeri F (2001). BAMS method: Theory and simulations, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B, 63, 234-249.
  26. Wand MP (2000). A comparison of regression spline smoothing procedures, Computational Statistics, 15, 443-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001800000047
  27. Wold S, Martens H, and Wold H (1983). The multivariate calibration problem in chemistry solved by PLS. In A Ruhe and B Kagstrom (Eds), Matrix Pencils, (pp. 286-293), Springer, Heidelberg.