Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제47권4호
  • /
  • Pages.489-502
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Moment ratio considering composite beam action for steel special moment frames

  • Sang Whan Han (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Soo Ik Cho (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Taeo Kim (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kihak Lee (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sejong University)
  • 투고 : 2022.06.15
  • 심사 : 2023.03.22
  • 발행 : 2023.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The strong column-weak beam (SCWB) moment ratio is specified in AISC 341 to prevent an abrupt column sway in steel special moment frames (SMFs) during earthquakes. Even when the SCWB requirement is satisfied for an SMF, a column-sway can develop in the SMF. This is because the contribution of the composite beam action developed in the concrete floor slab and its supporting beams was not included while calculating the SCWB moment ratio. In this study, we developed a new method for calculating the SCWB moment ratio that included the contribution of composite beam action. We evaluated the seismic collapse performance of the SMFs considering various risk categories and building heights. We demonstrated that the collapse performance of the SMFs was significantly improved by using the proposed SCWB equation that also satisfied the target performance specified in ASCE 7.

키워드

과제정보

The research was supported by "Leaders in Industryuniversity Cooperation 3.0" Project (the Ministry of Education) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C2010548).

참고문헌

  1. AISC 341 (2016a), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. AISC 358 (2016b), Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL,
  3. AISC 360 (2016c), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL,
  4. AISC (2017), Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL,
  5. Applied Technology Council (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA.
  6. ASCE 7 (2017a), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA,
  7. ASCE 41 (2017b), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
  8. ATC (2010), Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings, PEER/ATC 72-1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City,
  9. Bech, D., Tremayne, B. and Houston, J. (2015), Proposed Changes to Steel Column Evaluation Criteria for Existing Buildings, Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures 2015, 255-272, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479728.022.
  10. Bruneau, M., Uang, C.M. and Sabelli, S. (2011), Ductile Design of Steel Structures, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY, USA.\
  11. Cho, S.I., Han, S.W. and Kim, T. (2022a), Design Section of Risk Category II, III, and IV-model SMFs, Seismic Engineering and Structural Dynamics Lab. http://earthquake.hanyang.ac.kr/data/publications/supplement/El ectronic_supplement_Design_section_of_risk_category_II_III_ and_IV_model_SMFs.pdf.
  12. Choi, S.W. and Park, H.S. (2011), "A study on the minimum column-to-beam moment ratio of steel moment resisting frame with various connection models", Structures Congress, 2011, 3008-3017, https://doi.org/10.1061/41171(401)261.
  13. CSI (2019), ETABS Version 18.1.0, Computers and structures Inc., Walnut Creek, CA, USA. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs.
  14. Deniz, D., Song, J. and Hajjar J.F. (2018), "Energy-based sidesway collapse fragilities for ductile structural frames under earthquake loadings", Eng. Struct., 174, 282-294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.019.
  15. Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H. and Lignos, D.G. (2013), "An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(1), 25-41, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2191.
  16. Elkady, A. and Lignos, D.G. (2015), "Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(8), 1289-1307, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519.
  17. Elkady, A. and Lignos, D.G. (2014), "Modeling of the composite action in fully restrained beam-to-column connections: implications in the seismic design and collapse capacity of steel special moment frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(13), 1935-1954, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2430.
  18. Fereshtehnejad, E., Banazadeh, M. and Shafieezadeh, A. (2016), "System reliability-based seismic collapse assessment of steel moment frames using incremental dynamic analysis and Bayesian probability network", Eng. Struct., 118, 274-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.057.
  19. Flores, F.X., Charney, F.A. and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2014), "Influence of the gravity framing system on the collapse performance of special steel moment frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 101, 351-362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.020.
  20. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), Seismic Demands for the Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures, Report No. 132, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  21. Han, S.W., Jung, J. and Ha, S.J. (2016), "Seismic performance of WUF-W moment connections according to access hole geometries", Earthq. Spectra, 32(2), 909-926, https://doi.org/10.1193/060614eqs082m.
  22. Han, S.W., Kim, T.O., Kim, D.H. and Baek, S.J. (2017), "Seismic collapse performance of special moment steel frames with torsional irregularities", Eng. Struct., 141, 482-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.045.
  23. Han, S.W. and Kim, N.H. (2017), "Permissible parameter ranges of access hole geometries for WUF-W connections", Earthq. Spectra, 33(2), 687-707, https://doi.org/10.1193/060716EQS092M.
  24. Han, S.W., Moon, K.H. and Jung, J. (2014), "Cyclic performance of welded unreinforced flange-welded web moment connections", Earthq. Spectra, 30(4), 1663-1681. https://doi.org/10.1193/080212EQS250M.
  25. Harris, J. and Speicher, M. (2018), "Assessment of performancebased seismic design methods in ASCE 41 for new steel buildings: special moment frames", Earthq. Spectra, 34(3), 977-999, https://doi.org/10.1193/050117EQS079EP.
  26. Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Deierlein, G.G., Dean, B.S. and Chou, J.H. (2011), "Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: assessment of ductile moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 137(4), 481-491, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318.
  27. Ibarra, L.F. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic Excitations, Report No. 152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  28. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489-1511, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.
  29. Kim, T. and Han, S.W. (2022b), "New seismic design method to improve collapse performance of steel ordinary moment frames", J. Build. Eng., 50, 104183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104183.
  30. Kim, T. and Han, S.W. (2021), "Seismic collapse performance of steel special moment frames designed using different analysis methods", Earthq. Spectra, 37(2), 988-1012, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020970969.
  31. Lee, K. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 653-670, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147.
  32. Lignos, D.G., Hartloper, A.R. Elkady, A., Deierlein, G.G. and Hamburger, R. (2019), "Proposed updates to the ASCE 41 nonlinear modeling parameters for wide-flange steel columns in support of performance-based seismic engineering", J. Struct. Eng., 145(9), 04019083, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002353.
  33. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
  34. Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2002), Seismic Demands for Nondeteriorating Frame Structures and Their Dependence on Ground Motions, Report No. 144, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  35. Newell, J.D. (2008), Cyclic Behavior and Design of Steel Columns Subjected to Large Drift, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  36. NIST (2010), Evaluation of the FEMA P695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, NIST GCR 10-917-8, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  37. NIST (2012), Tentative Framework for Development of Advanced Seismic Design Criteria for New Buildings, NIST GCR 12-917-20, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  38. NIST (2016), Seismic Design of Steel Special Moment Frames - A Guide for Practicing Engineers, second edition, NIST GCR 16- 917-41, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  39. NIST (2017), Recommended Modeling Parameters and Acceptance Criteria for Nonlinear Analysis in Support of Seismic Evaluation, Retrofit, and Design, NIST GCR 17-917-45, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  40. Ricles, J.M., Sause, R., Peng, S.W. and Lu, L.W. (2002), "Experimental evaluation of earthquake resistant posttensioned steel connections", J. Struct. Eng., 128(7), 850-859. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(429).
  41. Segui, W.T. (2012), Steel Design, Cengage Learning, Stamford, CT, USA.
  42. Wu, T.Y., El-Tawil, S. and McCormick, J. (2020), "Influence of seismic design evolution on the seismic collapse behavior and losses of prototype steel buildings with moment-resisting frames", J. Struct. Eng., 146(9), 04020177, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002743.
  43. Yun, S.Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 534-545, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534).
  44. Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2007), "Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1901-1914, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702.
  45. Zareian, F., Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2010), "Evaluation of seismic collapse performance of steel special moment resisting frames using FEMA P695 (ATC-63) methodology", Structures Congress, 2010. 1275-1286, https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)116.
  46. Zareian, F. and Median, R.A. (2010), "A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems", Comput. Struct., 88(1-2), 45-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.001.