Structural Monitoring and Maintenance

  • 제10권1호
  • /
  • Pages.87-105
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2288-6605(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-6613(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The development of the seismic fragility curves of existing bridges in Indonesia (Case study: DKI Jakarta)

  • Veby Citra Simanjuntak (Structural Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology) ;
  • Iswandi Imran (Structural Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology) ;
  • Muslinang Moestopo (Structural Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology) ;
  • Herlien D. Setio (Structural Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.14
  • 심사 : 2023.04.03
  • 발행 : 2023.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Seismic regulations have been updated from time to time to accommodate an increase in seismic hazards. Comparison of seismic fragility of the existing bridges in Indonesia from different historical periods since the era before 1990 will be the basis for seismic assessment of the bridge stock in Indonesia, most of which are located in earthquake-prone areas, especially those built many years ago with outdated regulations. In this study, seismic fragility curves were developed using incremental non-linear time history analysis and more holistically according to the actual strength of concrete and steel material in Indonesia to determine the uncertainty factor of structural capacity, βc. From the research that has been carried out, based on the current seismic load in SNI 2833:2016/Seismic Map 2017 (7% probability of exceedance in 75 years), the performance level of the bridge in the era before SNI 2833:2016 was Operational-Life Safety whereas the performance level of the bridge designed with SNI 2833:2016 was Elastic - Operational. The potential for more severe damage occurs in greater earthquake intensity. Collapse condition occurs at As = FPGA x PGA value of bridge Era I = 0.93 g; Era II = 1.03 g; Era III = 1.22 g; Era IV = 1.54 g. Furthermore, the fragility analysis was also developed with geometric variations in the same bridge class to see the effect of these variations on the fragility, which is the basis for making bridge risk maps in Indonesia.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2011), Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, In Subcommittee T-3 for Seismic Effects on Bridges, USA.
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2020), AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification 9th Edition, Washington, USA.
  3. ATC 72-1 (2010), Modelling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings, PEER/ATC
  4. Avsar, O. and Yakut, A. (2012), "Seismic vulnerability assessment criteria for RC ordinary highway bridges in Turkey", Struct. Eng. Mech., 43(1), 127-145. https//doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.43.1.127.
  5. Beilic D. et al. (2017), "Seismic fragility curves of single storey RC precast structures by comparing different Italian codes", Earthq. Struct., 12(3), 359-374, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.359.
  6. Billah, A.H.M. and Shahria Alam, M. (2014), "Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: A state-of-the-art review", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.912243.
  7. Building Problem Research Board (1969), Indonesian Load Regulations 1970, NI 18.
  8. Choi, E., DesRoches, R. and Nileson, B. (2004), "Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone", Eng. Struct., 26, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
  9. Crespi, P. et al. (2020), "Seismic assessment of six typologies of existing RC bridges", Infrastruct., 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060052
  10. Department of Public Works (1992), Bridge Management System (BMS) 1992. 
  11. Directorate General of Highways Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia [https://data.pu.go.id]. (26 July 2021).
  12. Dukes, J., et al (2018), "Development of a bridge-specific fragility methodology to improve the seismic resilience of bridges", Earthq. Struct., 15(3), 253-261, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.3.253.
  13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003), HAZUS-MH MR4 Technical Manual, Multi- Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Earthquake Model. Washington, D.C
  14. FHWA-NHI (2014), LRFD Seismic Analysis & Design of Bridges Reference Manual (Publication No. FHWANHI-15-004). Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
  15. Han, Q., Dong, H., Du, X. and Zhou, Y. (2015), "Pounding analysis of RC bridge considering spatial variability of ground motions", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 1029-1044. https//doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1029.
  16. Hutapea, B.M., Asrurifak, M. and Hendriyawan, H. (2015), Generation of a pair of surface time histories for Jakarta used for earthquake resistance design of infrastructures. Jurnal Teknologi.
  17. Indonesian National Standard (2008), Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, SNI 2833:2008.
  18. Indonesian National Standard (2016), Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, SNI 2833:2016.
  19. Karim, K.R. and Yamazaki, F. (2003), "A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.291.
  20. Kehila, F., Remki, M., Zourgui, N.H. and Kibboua, A. (2021), "Optimal intensity measure of post-tensioned girder highway bridge using fragility curves", Earthq. Struct., 20(6), 681-696. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.6.681.
  21. Kibboua, A., Naili, M., Benouar, D. and Kehila, F. (2011), "Analytical fragility curves for typical Algerian reinforced concrete bridge piers", Struct. Eng. Mech., 39(3), 411-425. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.3.411.
  22. Lim, E., Kusumastuti, D., Rildova, Asneindram, M. and Mulyadi, S.S. (2021), "Performance based evaluation of an existing continuous reinforced concrete bridge-a case study", E3S Web of Conference, 331, 05008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133105008.
  23. Maison, B.F. and Speicher, M.S. (2016), "Loading protocols for ASCE 41 backbone curves", Earthq. Spectra, 32(4), 2513-2532. https://doi.org/10.1193/010816EQS007EP.
  24. Mander, J.B. Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J.Struct.Eng, 114, 1804-1824. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  25. Ministry of Public Works (2002), Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2002.
  26. Ministry of Public Works (2004), Guidelines for Bridge Design for Earthquake Loads, PdT-04-2004-B.
  27. Ministry of Public Works (2010), Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2010.
  28. Ministry of Public Works and Housing (2017), Indonesia Earthquake Source and Hazard Map 2017, National Earthquake Study Center.
  29. Mitchell, et al (2010), "Evolution of seismic design provisions in the national building code of Canada", Can. J. Civil Eng., 37(9), 1157-1170. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-054.
  30. Moschonas, I.F., Kappos, A.J. and Panetsos, P. (2009), "Seismic fragility curves for Greek bridges: Methodology and case studies", Bull Earthq. Eng., 7, 439-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9077-2.
  31. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine (2020), NCHRP 949 Research Report - Proposed AASHTO Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design, Washington D.C.
  32. Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2007), "Analytical seismic fragility curve for typical bridges in the Central and Southern United States", Earthq. Spectra, 23(3), 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2756815.
  33. Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2007), "Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 36, 823-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
  34. Olmos, B.A., Jara, J.M. and Jara, M. (2012), "Influence of some relevant parameters in the seismic vulnerability of RC bridges", Earthq. Struct., 3(3-4), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.365
  35. Ramanatan, K., DesRoches, R. and Padgett, J.E. (2012), "A comparison of pre-and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multispan bridge classes", Eng. Struct., 45, 559-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.004.
  36. Shekhar, S., Ghosh, J. and Ghosh, S. (2019), "Impact of design code evolution on failure mechanism and seismic fragility of highway bridge piers", J. Bridge Eng., 25(2), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001518.
  37. Shinozuka, M., Saxena, V. and Deodatis, G. (2000), Effect of spatial variation of ground motion on highway structures, Technical Report MCEER-00-0013, December 31, 2000.
  38. Shinozuka, M, Banerjee, S. and Kim, S.H. (2007), Fragility considerations in highway bridge design, Technical Report MCEER-07-0023, December 14, 2007.
  39. Simanjuntak, V.C., Imran, I, Moestopo, M. and Setio, H.D. (2022), "The evolution of seismic design provisions in Indonesia's national bridge code", J. Eng. Tech. Sci., https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2022.54.6.14.
  40. Simon, J. and Vigh, L.G. (2016), "Seismic fragility assessment of integral precast multi-span bridges in areas of moderate seismicity", Bull. Earthq. Eng., https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9947-y.
  41. Simon, J. and Vigh, L.G. (2017), "Parametric seismic evaluation of highway overpass bridges in moderate seismic areas", Earthq. Struct., 12(3), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.375.
  42. Stefanidou, S.P. and Kappos, A.J. (2018), "Bridge specific fragility analysis: when is it really necessary?", Bull. Earthq. Eng., https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00525-9.
  43. SYNER-G (2011), D2.12-Efficient Intensity Measures for Components Within a Number of Infrastructures.
  44. Transportation Research Board of The National Academies (2013), Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design NCHRP Synthesis 440, Washington: TRB.
  45. TRC/Imbsen (2010), XTRACT Cross Section Analysis Software for Structural & Earthquake Engineering.
  46. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic 2002, 31, 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  47. Waseem, M. and Spacone, E. (2021), "Fragility curves for the typical multi-span simply supported bridges in northern Pakistan", Struct. Eng. Mech., 64(2), 213-223. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.2.213.