DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technical Feasibility of Quantitative Measurement of Various Degrees of Small Bowel Motility Using Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Ji Young Choi (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jihye Yun (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Subin Heo (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Dong Wook Kim (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Sang Hyun Choi (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jiyoung Yoon (Department of Gastroenterology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center) ;
  • Kyuwon Kim (Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kee Wook Jung (Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung-Jae Myung (Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.17
  • 심사 : 2023.08.01
  • 발행 : 2023.11.01

초록

Objective: Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a noninvasive method to quantitatively assess bowel motility. However, its accuracy in measuring various degrees of small bowel motility has not been extensively evaluated. We aimed to draw a quantitative small bowel motility score from cine MRI and evaluate its performance in a population with varying degrees of small bowel motility. Materials and Methods: A total of 174 participants (28.5 ± 7.6 years; 135 males) underwent a 22-second-long cine MRI sequence (2-dimensional balanced turbo-field echo; 0.5 seconds per image) approximately 5 minutes after being intravenously administered 10 mg of scopolamine-N-butyl bromide to deliberately create diverse degrees of small bowel motility. In a manually segmented area of the small bowel, motility was automatically quantified using a nonrigid registration and calculated as a quantitative motility score. The mean value (MV) of motility grades visually assessed by two radiologists was used as a reference standard. The quantitative motility score's correlation (Spearman's ρ) with the reference standard and performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC], sensitivity, and specificity) for diagnosing adynamic small bowel (MV of 1) were evaluated. Results: For the MV of the quantitative motility scores at grades 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3, the mean ± standard deviation values were 0.019 ± 0.003, 0.027 ± 0.010, 0.033 ± 0.008, 0.032 ± 0.009, and 0.043 ± 0.013, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between the quantitative motility score and the MV (ρ = 0.531, P < 0.001). The AUROC value for diagnosing a MV of 1 (i.e., adynamic small bowel) was 0.953 (95% confidence interval, 0.923-0.984). Moreover, the optimal cutoff for the quantitative motility score was 0.024, with a sensitivity of 100% (15/15) and specificity of 89.9% (143/159). Conclusion: The quantitative motility score calculated from a cine MRI enables diagnosis of an adynamic small bowel, and potentially discerns various degrees of bowel motility.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Husebye E. The patterns of small bowel motility: physiology and implications in organic disease and functional disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1999;11:141-161
  2. Soffer EE. Small bowel motility: ready for prime time? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2000;2:364-369
  3. Jung KW, Myung SJ. An Asian perspective on irritable bowel syndrome. Intest Res 2023;21:189-195
  4. Di Ciaula A, Covelli M, Berardino M, Wang DQ, Lapadula G, Palasciano G, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and motility disorders in patients with systemic scleroderma. BMC Gastroenterol 2008;8:7
  5. Kellow JE, Phillips SF. Altered small bowel motility in irritable bowel syndrome is correlated with symptoms. Gastroenterology 1987;92:1885-1893
  6. Kellow JE, Phillips SF, Miller LJ, Zinsmeister AR. Dysmotility of the small intestine in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1988;29:1236-1243
  7. Stanghellini V, Cogliandro RF, de Giorgio R, Barbara G, Salvioli B, Corinaldesi R. Chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction: manifestations, natural history and management. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2007;19:440-452
  8. Camilleri M, Hasler WL, Parkman HP, Quigley EM, Soffer E. Measurement of gastrointestinal motility in the GI laboratory. Gastroenterology 1998;115:747-762
  9. Hansen MB. Small intestinal manometry. Physiol Res 2002;51:541-556
  10. Madsen JL, Larsen NE, Hilsted J, Worning H. Scintigraphic determination of gastrointestinal transit times. A comparison with breath hydrogen and radiologic methods. Scand J Gastroenterol 1991;26:1263-1271
  11. Gronlund D, Poulsen JL, Sandberg TH, Olesen AE, Madzak A, Krogh K, et al. Established and emerging methods for assessment of small and large intestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29:e13008
  12. Fuyuki A, Ohkubo H, Higurashi T, Iida H, Inoh Y, Inamori M, et al. Clinical importance of cine-MRI assessment of small bowel motility in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: a retrospective study of 33 patients. J Gastroenterol 2017;52:577-584
  13. Ohkubo H, Kessoku T, Fuyuki A, Iida H, Inamori M, Fujii T, et al. Assessment of small bowel motility in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction using cine-MRI. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108:1130-1139
  14. Wnorowski AM, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG. How to perform and interpret cine MR enterography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1180-1189
  15. Hahnemann ML, Nensa F, Kinner S, Gerken G, Lauenstein TC. Motility mapping as evaluation tool for bowel motility: initial results on the development of an automated color-coding algorithm in cine MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:354-360
  16. Menys A, Taylor SA, Emmanuel A, Ahmed A, Plumb AA, Odille F, et al. Global small bowel motility: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 2013;269:443-450
  17. Odille F, Menys A, Ahmed A, Punwani S, Taylor SA, Atkinson D. Quantitative assessment of small bowel motility by nonrigid registration of dynamic MR images. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:783-793
  18. Akerman A, Mansson S, Fork FT, Leander P, Ekberg O, Taylor S, et al. Computational postprocessing quantification of small bowel motility using magnetic resonance images in clinical practice: an initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:277-287
  19. Menys A, Butt S, Emmanuel A, Plumb AA, Fikree A, Knowles C, et al. Comparative quantitative assessment of global small bowel motility using magnetic resonance imaging in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and healthy controls. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016;28:376-383
  20. Menys A, Atkinson D, Odille F, Ahmed A, Novelli M, RodriguezJusto M, et al. Quantified terminal ileal motility during MR enterography as a potential biomarker of Crohn's disease activity: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2494-2501
  21. Hahnemann ML, Nensa F, Kinner S, Kohler J, Gerken G, Umutlu L, et al. Quantitative assessment of small bowel motility in patients with Crohn's disease using dynamic MRI. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;27:841-848
  22. Seo N, Park SH, Kim KJ, Kang BK, Lee Y, Yang SK, et al. MR enterography for the evaluation of small-bowel inflammation in Crohn disease by using diffusion-weighted imaging without intravenous contrast material: a prospective noninferiority study. Radiology 2016;278:762-772
  23. Park SH, Huh J, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK. Diffusionweighted MR enterography for evaluating Crohn's disease: effect of anti-peristaltic agent on the diagnosis of bowel inflammation. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2554-2562
  24. Ha J, Park SH, Son JH, Kang JH, Ye BD, Park SH, et al. Is the mixed use of magnetic resonance enterography and computed tomography enterography adequate for routine periodic followup of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease? Korean J Radiol 2022;23:30-41
  25. Horn BK, Schunck BG. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence 1981;17:185-203
  26. Gennert MA, Negahdaripour S. Relaxing the brightness constancy assumption in computing optical flow. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1987
  27. Teng CH, Lai SH, Chen YS, Hsu WH. Accurate optical flow computation under non-uniform brightness variations. Comput Vis Image Underst 2005;97:315-346
  28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
  29. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155-163
  30. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J 2005;47:458-472
  31. Kirchhoff S, Nicolaus M, Schirra J, Reiser MF, Goke B, Lienemann A. Assessment of colon motility using simultaneous manometric and functional cine-MRI analysis: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging 2011;36:24-30
  32. Vriesman MH, de Jonge CS, Kuizenga-Wessel S, Adler B, Menys A, Nederveen AJ, et al. Simultaneous assessment of colon motility in children with functional constipation by cine-MRI and colonic manometry: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol Exp 2021;5:8
  33. Paine P, McLaughlin J, Lal S. Review article: the assessment and management of chronic severe gastrointestinal dysmotility in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013;38:1209-1229
  34. Ghobrial PM, Neuberger I, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG, Parker L, O'Kane PL, et al. Cine MR enterography grading of small bowel peristalsis: evaluation of the antiperistaltic effectiveness of sublingual hyoscyamine sulfate. Acad Radiol 2014;21:86-91
  35. Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG, O'Kane PL, Deshmukh SP, Roth CG, Burach I, et al. Identifying decreased peristalsis of abnormal small bowel segments in Crohn's disease using cine MR enterography: the frozen bowel sign. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:1150-1156
  36. van Rijn KL, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJPM, Bouma G, Tielbeek JAW, Horsthuis K, et al. Fasted and fed small bowel motility patterns at cine-MRI in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;33:e14062
  37. Heye T, Stein D, Antolovic D, Dueck M, Kauczor HU, Hosch W. Evaluation of bowel peristalsis by dynamic cine MRI: detection of relevant functional disturbances--initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:859-867
  38. de Jonge CS, Smout AJPM, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J. Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: advances, challenges and opportunities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018;30:e13257
  39. Plumb AA, Menys A, Russo E, Prezzi D, Bhatnagar G, Vega R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-quantified small bowel motility is a sensitive marker of response to medical therapy in Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;42:343-355