DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of the Rehabilitation Motivation Evaluation Tool for Stroke Patients

뇌졸중 환자의 재활동기 평가도구에 관한 체계적 문헌고찰

  • Lee, Eun-Young (Institute of Brain Science Research, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Kang-Hyun (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Baekseok University)
  • 이은영 (원광대학교 의과대학 뇌과학연구소) ;
  • 박강현 (백석대학교 작업치료학과 )
  • Received : 2023.01.17
  • Accepted : 2023.02.27
  • Published : 2023.05.31

Abstract

Objective : In this study, the rehabilitation motivation evaluation tool for stroke patients was identified, and the characteristics of the evaluation tool were analyzed to analyze the conceptual framework and characteristics used in the composition of the evaluation contents. Methods : From 2000 to May 2022, documents registered in major domestic and foreign databases (PubMed, NDSL, Medline, and EMbase) were searched and selected according to the selection and exclusion criteria. The evaluation tools used in the selected documents were analyzed, and the characteristics of this evaluation tool were analyzed. Results : A total of 30 documents were selected, and they were classified into a total of five rehabilitation motivation evaluation tools. The most widely used in Korea was the measurement tool for rehabilitation motivation for the disabled, and the most widely used overseas was the intrinsic motivation inventory. Three evaluation tools constructed the evaluation contents based on the self-determination theory, and two constructed the evaluation contents through expert agreement. The number of evaluation items and 8 to 45 items were varied, and the evaluation scale was also used in various ways from 4 to 7 point scale. Conclusion : It was possible to identify the evaluation tools mainly used for the evaluation of rehabilitation motivation, and to identify the main conceptual framework based on the development of the rehabilitation motivation evaluation tool. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data for research on the development of rehabilitation motivation evaluation tools for stroke patients in the future.

목적 : 본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자를 위한 재활동기 평가도구를 알아보고, 그 평가도구의 특징을 분석하여 평가내용의 구성에 사용된 개념적 틀과 특징을 분석하고자 하였다. 연구방법 : 2000년부터 2022년 5월까지 국내외 주요 데이터베이스(PubMed, National Digital Science Library [NDSL], Medline, EMbase)에 등록된 문헌들을 검색하여, 선정과 제외 기준에 따라 문헌을 선정하였다. 선정된 문헌들에서 사용한 평가도구들을 분석하고, 이 평가도구의 특징을 분석하고자 하였다. 결과 : 검색기준에 따라 총 30편의 문헌이 선정되었으며, 각 문헌에서 사용된 재활동기 평가도구를 분류한 결과 총 5개의 재활동기 평가도구로 분류되었다. 국내에서 가장 많이 사용되는 것은 장애인 재활동기 측정도구였으며, 국외에서 가장 많이 사용되는 것은 intrinsic motivation inventory였다. 5개의 평가도구의 평가내용 구성에 사용된 이론적 틀을 알아본 결과, 3개의 평가도구가 자기결정 이론(self-determination theory)에 근거하여 평가내용을 구성하였으며, 2개는 전문가 합의를 통해 평가내용을 구성하였다. 평가 항목수와 8개부터 45개 항목까지 다양하였으며, 평가 척도도 4점부터 7점까지 다양하게 사용되었다. 결론 : 본 연구를 통해 국내외 재활동기 평가를 위해 주로 사용되는 평가도구를 파악할 수 있었으며, 재활동기 평가도구 개발에 근거가 되는 주요 이론적 틀이 무엇인지 파악할 수 있었다. 본 연구 결과는 추후 뇌졸중 환자를 위한 재활동기 평가도구 개발 연구에 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 보여진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbesman, M., Scheer, J., & Lieberman, D. (2008). Using AOTA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised paper (CAP) series to link evidence to practice. OT Practice, 13(12), 18-22.
  2. Bartlett, D. J., & Palisano, R. J. (2002). Physical therapists' perceptions of factors influencing the acquisition of motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: Implications for clinical reasoning. Physical Therapy, 82(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.3.237
  3. Boiche, J., Gourlan, M., Trouilloud, D., & Sarrazin, P. (2019). Development and validation of the 'Echelle de Motivation envers l'Activite Physique en contexte de Sante': A motivation scale towards health-oriented physical activity in French. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(3), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316676626
  4. Boosman, H., Visser-Meily, J. M., Winkens, I., & van Heugten, C. M. (2013). Clinicians' views on learning in brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 27(6), 685-688. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.775504
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
  8. Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  9. Hafen, K., Jastrebow, J., Nubling, R., & Bengel, J. (2001). Entwicklung eines Patientenfragebogens zur Erfassung der Reha-Motivation (PAREMO). Die Rehabilitation, 40(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-12136
  10. Han, H. S., & Lim, N. Y. (2002). On the test of the reliability and validity of the disabled's motivation scale for rehabilitation. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing, 5(2), 124-133.
  11. Holmqvist, L. W., & von Koch, L. (2001). Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation. British Medical Journal, 322(7301), 1501-1502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1501
  12. Karahan, A. Y., Kucuksen, S., Yilmaz, H., Salli, A., Gungor, T., & Sahin, M. (2014). Effects of rehabilitation services on anxiety, depression, care-giving burden and perceived social support of stroke caregivers. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 57(2), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2014.42
  13. Kim, H. S., Hwang, Y. O., Yu, J. H., Jung, J. H., Woo, H. S., & Jung, H. S. (2009). The correlation between depression, motivation for rehabilitation, activities of daily living, and quality of life in stroke patients. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(3), 41-53.
  14. Kim, S. Y., & Kim, I. H. (2017). Factors convergent influencing rehabilitation motivation among stroke patients. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(9), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.9.375
  15. Kwon, H. K., & Lee, S. J. (2017). The effect of a movie-based nursing intervention program on rehabilitation motivation and depression in stroke patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.345
  16. Kumar, S., Selim, M. H., & Caplan, L. R. (2010). Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurology, 9(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2
  17. Lee, M., & Oh, S. (2020). The mediating effects of self-efficacy on depression and rehabilitation motivation in stroke patients. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 11(3), 927-939. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.3.66
  18. Lin, F. H., Yih, D. N., Shih, F. M., & Chu, C. M. (2019). Effect of social support and health education on depression scale scores of chronic stroke patients. Medicine, 98(44), e17667. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017667
  19. Litman, T. J. (1964). An analysis of the sociologic factors affecting the rehabilitation of physically handicapped patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 45, 9-16.
  20. Maclean, N., Pound, P., Wolfe, C., & Rudd, A. (2000). Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. British Medical Journal, 321(7268), 1051-1054. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1051
  21. Maclean, N., Pound, P., Wolfe, C., & Rudd, A. (2002). The concept of patient motivation: A qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke, 33(2), 444-448. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0202.102367
  22. Mattson, R. H. (1982). A graphic definition of the horticultural therapy model. In R. H. Mattson, & J. Shoemaker (Eds.). Defining horticulture as a therapeutic modality (pp. 43-58). Department of Horticulture, Kansas State University.
  23. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
  24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  25. Monahan, F. D., Sands, J. K., Neighbors, M., Marek, J. F., & Green-Nigro, C. J. (2007). Phipps' medical-surgical nursing: Health and illness perspectives (8th ed). Elsevier Mosby.
  26. Morris, J. H., Oliver, T., Kroll, T., Joice, S., & Williams, B. (2017). Physical activity participation in community dwelling stroke survivors: Synergy and dissonance between motivation and capability. A qualitative study. Physiotherapy, 103(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.001
  27. Na, E. H., & Ryu, S. A. (2022). Structural model of self-care adherence based on self-determination theory for life care of first stroke patients. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 16(6), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2022.8.16.6.291
  28. Pallesen, H., Aadal, L., Moe, S., & Arntzen, C. (2019). Gateway to recovery: A comparative analysis of stroke patients' experiences of change and learning in Norway and Denmark. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2019, 1726964. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1726964
  29. Park, A. S., & Ko, E. (2017). Influences of rehabilitation motivation, self-efficacy and family support on rehabilitation adherence in stroke patients. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 19(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2017.19.2.113
  30. Park, A. S., Ko, E., & Kang, H. S. (2016). Comparison of motivation for rehabilitation, family support and adherence to rehabilitation between depressive and non-depressive stroke patients. The Korean Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing, 19(2), 138-147. http://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2016.138
  31. Poltawski, L., Boddy, K., Forster, A., Goodwin, V. A., Pavey, A. C., & Dean, S. (2015). Motivators for uptake and maintenance of exercise: Perceptions of long-term stroke survivors and implications for design of exercise programmes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(9), 795-801. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.946154
  32. Powers, W. J., Rabinstein, A. A., Ackerson, T., Adeoye, O. M., Bambakidis, N. C., Becker, K., Biller, J., Brown, M., Demaerschalk, B. M., Hoh, B., Jauch, E. C., Kidwell, C. S., Leslie-Mazwi, T. M., Ovbiagele, B., Scott, P. A., Sheth, K. N., Southerland, A. M., Summers, D. V., Tirschwell, D. L., & American Heart Association Stroke Council. (2018). 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 49(3), e46-e110. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
  33. Relf, P. D. (2008). Historical perspective on theoretical models for research and program development in horticultural therapy. Acta Horticulturae, 775, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.775.9
  34. Rettig, K. D., Danes, S. M., & Leichtentritt, R. D. (1997). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses to economic stress. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 26(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X970261001
  35. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
  37. Sempik, J., Aldridgem, J., & Becker, S. (2003). Social and therapeutic horticulture: Evidence and messages from research. Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University.
  38. Seo, M. Y., & Yang, J. (2020). Factors influencing rehabilitation motivation of veterans after a stroke. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals Nursing, 27(3), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2020.27.3.215
  39. Shoemaker, C. A. & Lin, M. (2008). A model for healthy aging with horticulture. Acta Horticulturae, 775, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.775.10
  40. Siegert, R. J., & Taylor, W. J. (2004). Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001644932
  41. Song, S. I., Lee, J. M., & Jung, J. H. (2015). The effect of task-oriented activity on self-efficacy and rehabilitation motivation for stroke patients. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 54(4), 303-321. https://doi.org/10.15870/jsers.2015.12.54.4.303
  42. Stewart, C., Power, E., McCluskey, A., & Kuys, S. (2020). Development of a participatory, tailored behaviour change intervention to increase active practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(24), 3516-3524. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1597178
  43. Tatla, S. K., Sauve, K., Jarus, T., Virji-Babul, N., & Holsti, L. (2014). The effects of motivating interventions on rehabilitation outcomes in children and youth with acquired brain injuries: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 28(8), 1022-1035. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.890747
  44. Waddington H. (2009). Psychological and communication issues in feeding post-stroke patients with dysphagia. Nursing Times, 105(32-33), 25-26.
  45. Won, J. I. (2020). Impact of patients' level of participation in rehabilitation on functional outcome in patients with stroke. Physical Therapy Korea, 27(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2020.27.1.63
  46. You, Y. Y., & Ahn, C. S. (2009). A study of the relationships between perceived rehabilitation - motivation and quality of life in patients after a cerebrovascular accident. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(2), 1-16.
  47. Young, J., & Forster, A. (2007). Review of stroke rehabilitation. British Medical Journal, 334(7584), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39059.456794.68