DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소규모 공공시설 조사시 세천의 위험도 평가 방안

Risk Assessment Improvement Method of Small Stream When Small Sized Hazard Infrastructures Survey

  • 노정수 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원 도시환경재난관리전공) ;
  • 전계원 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원 도시환경재난관리전공) ;
  • 신재성 (강원대학교 방재전문대학원 도시환경재난관리전공)
  • Jungsoo Rho (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kyewon Jun (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jaesung Shin (Graduate School of Disaster Prevention, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.03.14
  • 심사 : 2023.03.23
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31

초록

최근 기후변화로 인한 태풍, 국지성 집중호우 등 자연재해에 의한 피해가 급증하면서 행정안전부에서는 「소규모 공공시설 안전관리 등에 관한 법률(2016 개정)」을 제정하고 각 지자체별로 소규모 공공시설을 조사하여 국가재난안전관리시스템(NDMS)에 등록하고 매년 3월 31일까지 안전점검을 실시하고 있다. 이를 위해 최근 각 지자체별로 소규모 공공시설 안전점검 및 정비계획 수립 용역이 발주되어 세천, 소교량, 농로, 마을진입로, 취입보, 낙차공의 6가지 유형의 시설물을 조사하여 DB화 하고, 각 시설물별 위험도 평가를 수행하여 위험시설의 경우 정비계획을 수립하고 있다. 그러나 현재까지 배포된 소규모 공공시설의 위험도 평가 방법은 현장조사자의 육안조사를 통해 이루어지고 있으므로, 위험도 평가가 주관적이고 모호한 형태로 이루어지고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 소규모 공공시설 중 재해위험도가 가장 높은 세천에 대하여 위험도 정량평가지표를 제시함으로써 합리적이고 정량적인 위험도 평가가 이루어질 수 있도록 하였으며, 이를 통해 소규모 위험시설을 선정하여 정비계획 및 시행계획 수립에 있어 투명한 근거자료를 확보할 수 있도록 하였다.

Recently, the damage caused by natural disasters such as typhoons and localized torrential rains has been increasing rapidly. The Ministry of the Interior and Safety enacted a 「law on safety management of small sized infrastructures」 and local governments have to register small sized infrastructures with the National Disaster and Safety Management System (NDMS) until March 31st every year. Recently, each local government has ordered Safety inspections of small sized infrastructures and maintenance plans and six types of facilities, including small streams, small bridges, farm roads, access roads to village, inlet weirs, and drop structures are being surveyed and digitized into a database. Each facility is being evaluated for risk, and for those deemed hazardous, maintenance plans are being developed. However, since the risk assessment method of small sized infrastructures is not clear so that is conducted through visual investigation by field investigators, risk assessment is conducted in a subjective and ambiguous form. Therefore, this study presented a reasonable and quantitative risk assessment method by providing a quantitative evaluation indicator for small stream, which has the highest disaster risk among other small sized infrastructures, so that small sized hazard infrastructures can be selected to secure transparent evidence for improvement plans and action plans.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, Hyung Joon, Jung Young Lee, and Hyo Sang Lee. (2021). Flood Runoff Computation for Mountainous Small Basins Using WMS Model. Journal of Korean Society of Disaster and Security. 14(4): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.21729/KSDS.2021.14.4.9
  2. Cheong, Tae Sung, Shinbum Hwang, Jongryul Park, Kukryul Oh, and Sangman Jeong. (2022). Assessment on Methodology for Predicting Flood Discharges in Creeks. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 22(5): 211-218. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2022.22.5.211
  3. Korea Water Resources Association and Korean River Association. (2019). Explanation of River Design Standards. Seoul: KWRA and KRA.
  4. Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. (2021). Explanation of Design Standards for Small River. Seoul: KOSHAM.
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (1990). Design Guidelines for Small-Scale Facilities. Gwacheon: MOLIT.
  6. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2020). Guidelines for Surveying Small-Sized Infrastructures. Sejong: MOIS.
  7. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2023). Detailed Evaluation Criteria for Hazard of Small-Sized Infrastructures. Sejong: MOIS.
  8. National Disaster Management Research Institute. (2021). Enhancement of Design Codes for the Small Sized Hazard Infrastructures. Ulsan: NDMI.
  9. Sungkyunkwan University. (2008). Study on Disaster Mitigation Techniques for Small-Scale Facilities. Seoul: SKKU.