한국의류학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)

  • 제47권1호
  • /
  • Pages.137-151
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-1151(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0793(eISSN)
한국의류학회 (The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Verification of the Accuracy of Photogrammetry in 3D Full-Body Scanning -A Case Study for Apparel Applications-

  • Eun Joo Ryu (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lu Zhang (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hwa Kyung Song (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.06
  • 심사 : 2022.11.19
  • 발행 : 2023.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Stationary 3D whole-body scanners generally require 5 to 20 seconds of scanning time and cannot effectively detect armpit and crotch areas. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the accuracy of a photogrammetric technique using a multi-camera system. First, dimensional accuracy was analyzed using a mannequin scan, comparing the differences between the scan-derived measurements and the direct measurements, with an allowable tolerance of ISO 20685-1:2018. Only 2 of 59 measurement items (ankle height and upper arm circumference, specifically) exceeded the ISO 20685-1:2018 criteria. When compared with the results of the eight stationary whole-body scanners assessed by the literature, the photogrammetric technique was found to have the advantage of scanning the top of the head, armpit, and crotch areas clearly. Second, this study found the photogrammetric technique is suitable for obtaining the body scans because it can minimize the perform scanning, resulting in a reduction of measurement errors due to breathing and uncontrolled movements. The error rate of the photogrammetry method was much lower than that of stationary 3D whole-body scanners.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5A8032479).

참고문헌

  1. Ang, K.-S., & Mitchell, H. L. (2010). Non-rigid surface matching and its application to scoliosis modelling. The Photogrammetric Record, 25(130), 105-118. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00581.x
  2. Akca, D., Remondino, F., Novak, D., Hanusch, T., Schrotter, G., & Gruen, A. (2006). Recording and modeling of cultural heritage objects with coded structured light projection systems. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology, Italy, 375-382. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005748895
  3. Arbutina, M., Dragan, D., Mihic, S., & Anisic, Z. (2017). Review of 3D body scanning systems. Acta Technica Corviniensis - Bulletin of Engineering, 10(1), 17-24. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/d24f4789f09a203da73dbfd8dc19c536/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=616471
  4. Barcelo, J. A., Forte, M., & Sanders, D. H. (2000). Virtual reality in archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  5. Cha, S. (2012). Comparison of size between direct-measurement and 3D body scanning. Journal of Fashion Business, 16(1), 150-159. doi:10.12940/jfb.2012.16.1.150
  6. Chong, A. K., Milburn, P., Newsham-West, R., & Voert, M. (2009). High-accuracy photogrammetric technique for human spine measurement. The Photogrammetric Record, 24(127), 264-279. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2009.00540.x
  7. Elbrecht, P., & Palm, K. J. (2014). Precision of 3D body scanners. Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems INES 2014, Hungary, 127-132. doi:10.1109/INES.2014.6909355
  8. Epic Games, Inc. (2021). RealityCapture (Version 1.2.1 Tarasque) [Computer software]. Capturing Reality. https://www.capturingreality.com/realitycapture
  9. Han, H., Nam, Y., & Choi, K. (2010). Comparative analysis of 3D body scan measurements and manual measurements of size Korea adult females. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(5), 530-540. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.06.002
  10. Kim, S.-H. (2020). Comparison of usability of 3D scanner and photogrammetry for the application of a reverse engineering system: Focused on life casts for special makeup. Journal of the Korean Society of Beauty and Arts, 21(2), 7-28. doi:10.18693/jksba.2020.21.2.7
  11. Kingsland, K. (2020). Comparative analysis of digital photogrammetry software for cultural heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 18:e00157. doi:10.10 16/j.daach.2020.e00157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00157
  12. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (2010). 제6차 인체치수조사 (2010~14) [The 6th anthropometric survey (2010-14) data]. Size Korea. Retrieved from https://sizekorea.kr/human-info/meas-report?measDegree=6
  13. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (2015). 제7차 인체치수조사 (2015) [The 7th anthropometric survey (2015) report]. Size Korea. Retrieved from https://sizekorea.kr/human-info/meas-report?measDegree=7
  14. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (2019a, November). 2020년 제8차 한국인 인체치수측정조사 대비 프로토콜 개발_최종보고서 [The final report of protocol development for the 8th Korean anthropometric survey in 2020]. Size Korea. Retrieved from https://sizekorea.kr/support/pds/view?bbsCntntsSeq=725¤tPageNo=1&searchType2=&searchWord1=
  15. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. (2019b, July 26). KS K 0051 Sizing systems for female adult's garments. Korean Standards & Certifications. Retrieved from https://standard.go.kr/KSCI/standardIntro/getStandardSearchView.do?menuId=503&topMenuId=502&ksNo=KSK0051&tmprKsNo=KSK0051&reformNo=04
  16. Larsen, P. K., Hansen, L., Simonsen, E. B., & Lynnerup, N. (2008). Variability of bodily measures of normally dressed people using PhotoModeler®Pro5. Journal of Forensic Science, 53(6), 1393-1399. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00874.x
  17. Lee, K. S., & Song, H. K. (2021). Automation of 3D average human body shape modeling using Rhino and Grasshopper algorithm. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1):23. doi:10.1186/s40691-021-00249-6
  18. Lu, J.-M., & Wang, M.-J. J. (2008). Automated anthropometric data collection using 3D whole body scanners. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1-2), 407-414. doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.008
  19. Mckinnon, L., & Istook, C. (2001). Comparative analysis of the image twin system and the 3T6 body scanner. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 1(2), 1-7.
  20. International Organization for Standardization. (2018, October). ISO 20685-1:2018 3-D scanning methodologies for internationally compatible anthropometric databases - Part 1: Evaluation protocol for body dimensions extracted from 3-D body scans[PDF document]. ISO. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/63260.html
  21. Paek, K. J., & Lee, J. R. (2008). Upper body measurement of men using 3D body scanner-Compared to anthropometry-. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(1), 24-34. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.1.024
  22. Park, S.-M., & Nam, Y.-J. (2012). The verification of accuracy of 3D body scan data - Focused on the cyberware WB4 whole body scanner -. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 14(1), 81-96.
  23. Percoco, G. (2011). Digital close range photogrammetry for 3D body scanning for custom-made garments. The Photogrammetric Record, 26(133), 73-90. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00605.x
  24. Pesce, M., Galantucci, L. M., Percoco, G., & Lavecchia, F. (2015). A low-cost multi camera 3D scanning system for quality measurement of non-static subjects. Procedia CIRP, 28, 88-93. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.015
  25. Remondino, F. (2011). Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sensing, 3(6), 1104-1138. doi:10.3390/rs3061104
  26. Remondino, F., Rizzi, A., Agugiaro, G., Girardi, S., De Amicis, R., Magliocchetti, D., Girardi, G., & Baratti, G. (2010). Geomatics and geoinformatics for the digital 3D documentation, fruition and valorization of cultural heritage. Proceedings of EUROMED 2010 Workshop "Museum Futures: Emerging Technological and Social Paradigms", Cyprus. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323245824
  27. Remondino, F., Rizzi, A., Girardi, S., Petti, F. M., & Avanzini, M. (2010). 3D Ichnology-recovering digital 3D models of dinosaur footprints. The Photogrammetric Record, 25(131), 266-282. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00587.x
  28. Robinette, K. M., & Daanen, H. A. M. (2006). Precision of the CAESAR scan-extracted measurements. Applied Ergonomics, 37(3), 259-265. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.009
  29. Saiki, D., Stratton, T., Brik, V., & Sanchez, M. (2017). Exploring methods to make 3-D images of historic clothing using photogrammetry. Proceedings of International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference, USA. Retrieved from https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/itaa/article/id/1542/
  30. Wang, M.-J. J., Wu, W.-Y., Lin, K.-C., Yang, S.-N., & Lu, J.-M. (2007). Automated anthropometric data collection from three-dimensional digital human models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32(1-2), 109-115. doi:10.1007/s00170-005-0307-3
  31. Xia, S., Guo, S., Li, J., & Istook, C. (2019). Comparison of different body measurement techniques: 3D stationary scanner, 3D handheld scanner, and tape measurement. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 110(8), 1103-1113. doi:10.1080/00405000.2018.1541437