Acknowledgement
The illustration was supported by Sungkab Kim, Multimedia Part, Samsung Medical Center.
References
- Verma S, Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1920-1929 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1207059
- Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, Maleszewski JJ, Edwards WD, Roman MJ, et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60:448-476 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab038
- Song JK. Bicuspid aortic valve: unresolved issues and role of imaging specialists. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015;23:1-7 https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2015.23.1.1
- Buchner S, Hulsmann M, Poschenrieder F, Hamer OW, Fellner C, Kobuch R, et al. Variable phenotypes of bicuspid aortic valve disease: classification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart 2010;96:1233-1240 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.186254
- Masri A, Svensson LG, Griffin BP, Desai MY. Contemporary natural history of bicuspid aortic valve disease: a systematic review. Heart 2017;103:1323-1330 https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309916
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:e25-e197 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
- Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Trindade PT, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Cardiac CT for the differentiation of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: comparison with echocardiography and surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:900-908 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3813
- Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Niinuma H, Ohsawa S, Okabayashi H, Ehara S. Diagnostic value of cardiac CT in the evaluation of bicuspid aortic stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and operative findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:895-899 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3164
- Lee SC, Ko SM, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK, Hwang HK. Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28 Suppl 1:33-44 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0066-9
- Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, Maleszewski JJ, Enriquez-Sarano M, Bax JJ, et al. Speaking a common language: introduction to a standard terminology for the bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020;63:419-424 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.006
- Ren X, Zhang M, Liu K, Hou Z, Gao Y, Yin W, et al. The significance of aortic valve calcification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;32:471-478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0783-y
- Pawade T, Sheth T, Guzzetti E, Dweck MR, Clavel MA. Why and how to measure aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1835-1848 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.045
- Takagi H, Yoshizawa M, Orii M, Kumagai A, Tashiro A, Chiba T, et al. Additive value of CT to age, aortic diameter, and echocardiography in diagnosis and classification of bicuspid aortic valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2021;3:e200423